Realistically, how long would steps 1 and 2 take? Because short description alone you’re talking a lifetime of development at least
Are you not in the US?
It’s not just my industry is the thing. Nobody I know has had anything like that. I feel like what you’re describing is a rarity.
The typical culture at most companies has been: come to work even if you are sick, unless you are VERY VERY sick. Their corporate policies supported this by requiring a signed form from a doctor saying that you are sick enough not to come in if you were going to be out more than a day or two. You had to prove it and pay for the privilege (doctors appointments are not free) and often doctors would refuse to sign said paperwork out of a worry of liability. This is common EVERYWHERE, and has been for DECADES.
In my entire adult life neither I nor anyone I know has had a work experience like this, so maybe you just work in a shit-ass industry. I've certainly taken time off when sick, and even when feeling a bit off my bosses have necouraged me to go home and rest up.
Requiring a doctor's note is an insane level of micro management that I have never heard of outside of forums where people share their work horror stories working for shit-ass companies.
Your original comment, in its entirety, said:
Before 2020, you would get in trouble for NOT coming into work even when obviously sick with tons of symptoms, unless you could prove that you were sick enough, usually by filling out some permission slip and paying a doctor to sign it. It's enough of a hassle that just people just always came to work even when coughing, sneezing, high fever, sore throat, whatever, can't afford to miss work, and companies de facto expected and encouraged this as normal behavior. Working when sick was a way to show dedication.
All that changed in a crazy extreme way for the last few years, but my guess is we'll be back to that soon though.
At no point do you mention the middle stage of companies letting people stay home to take care of themselves when they're sick, which is why your second comment seemed completely contradictory
That’s literally not what you wrote in your first comment lol. You implied the need for a permission slip from a doctor, and said that you’d get in trouble for not coming in (something that I have never experienced luckily, but I don’t think I’ve ever had a truly toxic workplace like that). You also suggested we would go back to that soon. That would be an awful thing.
Lol if I’m sick I’m not coming in. If my company doesn’t like that then I’m gonna start sending my resume around. The job market is always strong for an engineer with marketing skills, so I won’t step one foot outside my home if I’m actually sick
Honestly that’s not the type of life I want for anyone. People shouldn’t be coerced into coming into work even when sick. If you’re sick, stay home, take care of yourself.
Working from home has luckily made big leaps forward so people shouldn’t have to come in if they’re fighting a cold. Why make the rest of the company sick?
That kind of makes it sound even dumber
It’s actually mathematically impossible for his post NOT to align with any Q posts. If he posted at 20:38, it would be with Q post #2038. If he posted at 14:39, it would be with Q post #1439.
It’s a disservice to even call it a coincidence. It’s just a mathematical guarantee that no matter when he posts, there is a Q post that aligns.
I don’t understand why is is a big deal…or even a small deal
I really don’t get it. At this point literally every possible time will match with a Q post. No matter when trump posts, there is a Q post with a number. How are they significant? Why do these two posts align?
Anyone care to explain?
Is it fun or is it supposed to be proof? Everyone seems to take these points as indications that something is happening. It all just lacks consistency for it to really be anything significant at all
And if they’re all shitposts, why are they stickied and not labeled as such?
I’m sorry, but there never seems to be any consistency with how the numbers align. Sometimes it’s the number of the post, sometimes it’s the date, sometimes it’s the hours and minutes, sometimes it’s the minutes and seconds.
If there’s such a huge margin for error, isn’t literally everything matching up with a Q drop? I’m currently writing this comment at 9:32. Should this mean that it’s a proof of #932?
Can someone help me with how you’re supposed to pick and choose what ties into what?
What’s this about the Depp trial? Literally everything I’ve seen has put Depp as the hero and Amber Heard as the villain in that case
The article gives no info supporting that the prediction came true though. It just says that it’s financial because he predicted it, and gives all the instances that he predicted it.
Every possible death has a possible motive. My brother committed suicide this year. If I want to think long and hard enough, I could assign plenty of motive from any number of people. You need more than just motive though, you need something that puts it beyond a reasonable doubt.
I don’t see how much benefit anyone has in these people dying, as anti-vax research is still very prominent and most people disregard it as silly
It makes no sense that the people are being murdered, and not just dying. Just because some people have been murdered for nefarious reasons before, doesn’t mean that every death is a murder
Two more weeks
I do doubt it, sincerely, because it makes absolutely no sense
It doesn't really jive, I don't think. I don't see any indication that there are many that are actually killed or even that the deaths are all that suspicious. The pattern doesn't really click for me, sorry to say.
Then how can one both claim that doctors are being killed off and also not being killed off? It's completely contradictory lol
I think most libs don’t really pay attention to anything at all on truth social. Hell, most don’t even know it exists.
So…yeah it’s gonna take a lot more than this for them to “cancel” the rainbow flag
Murder also isn’t proven by one blogger not being sure of the circumstances. Additionally, I’m not disproving murder, I’m disproving a pattern.
We first have to prove that these doctors are being actually murdered, and not just, yannow, dying
Not sure if you responded to the right thread. This isn’t relevant to the discussion.
I think it’s just best you find a new line of work if this is something you have experienced regularly. Like I said, I’ve literally never heard of anyone needing a doctors note to take sick leave. Not since I was in high school, at least