417
posted ago by VaccinesCauseSIDS ago by VaccinesCauseSIDS +418 / -1

https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateVaccines/comments/udg8me/in_this_thread_please_share_something_you_learned/

https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateVaccines/

I'll go first...

When i learned that vaccines caused "SIDS", it blew my mind,

but when i learned that SIDS was invented for the sole purpose of covering up the fact that vaccines kill babies, that really blew my mind!

Comments (392)
sorted by:
136
JonathanE 136 points ago +137 / -1

When I learned that all infectious diseases were already pretty much wiped out by better sanitation before vaccines were ever even introduced.

61
5DWeBe 61 points ago +61 / -0

This! And polio is caused by unsanitary water systems.

36
MAG768720 36 points ago +36 / -0

Polio was caused first by lead arsenic and then by DDT.

It finally went away when DDT was banned, except that it still exists in some parts of Africa where (a) DDT is still used, and (b) Bill Gates pushes "polio vaccines."

6
Callmejuls 6 points ago +7 / -1

Here’s another insane thing. My husband gets that the vaccine for covid is bad but when he heard the Newsmax story that measles is making a comeback, he starts talking about how our grandkids could die from it because our girls aren’t vaccinating them. They are homeschooling them, so shouldn’t be a problem.

10
CasuallyObservant 10 points ago +10 / -0

Tell him not to worry. I got the measles naturally when I was a kid, as did most of my classmates. We had spots and a fever and about 10 days later we were recovered and had lifetime immunity. Piece of cake.

2
Mutti2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Me too. 5 of us at one time. Poor Mom.

1
Callmejuls 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sounds like the chickenpox I had

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
40
snowdrift 40 points ago +40 / -0

I came here to say the same thing. When you look at bell curves of the election year infections (lol) over the past 50 years, you will see the infection rates were trending towards zero when a vaccine was introduced. Most of the pandemics were solved by not pooping in your water supply, washing your hands, sterilizing doctors instruments, etc.

22
y000danon 22 points ago +22 / -0

Bingo.

Hygiene is the one biggest thing for everyone.

Outside of that the thing from all this that stands out is something Col Wesley Clark said. He was asked of his biggest fear and he said “Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria” citing how it had entirely shut down entire platoons and cause massive issues. He said with the rates MDs prescribe them we will end up training bacferia that basically can’t be stopped.

Between Bacteria & Parasites - way more weary of that than Viruses now. I don’t avoid - just want a decent exposure and not constantly throwing treatments at things that shouldn’t be treated

Antibiotics also nuke your gut terribly

4
Joys1Daughter 4 points ago +4 / -0

THIS👆

4
y000danon 4 points ago +5 / -1

Yep.

To be honest I’ve been loosing some sleep cuz I think a gut feeling I had this whole time that the Covid-19 Plandemic was about one thing may be right. I felt it was a trial run sort of scenario where they looked to see how far they could push things, identify resistors, how folks resist, consolidate and obliterate economies, and general push forward on the one thing - having people take these vaccines that would lay a ground for their next salvo.

I’ve Lways thought Rona was about getting people to take a vaccine nobody knew shit about. Now they have and my gut says it’s softening them up for what’s next. As in it compromised their immunity like a binary agent / and next comes that binary compliment. Maybe they softened the dna response to flu, maybe smallpox. Gut is worried about smallpox as well. This is like a 20 years in dreams thing for me too so it super messes w me.

2
Joys1Daughter 2 points ago +3 / -1

I agree. It was a trial run to see how they would push the next virus to better effect. Their insidious plans are made for the long term to control us completely and by starting a slow plan where we are taken over bit by bit until no one notices that they've given away their freedom and become slaves. It's been happening for so long worldwide.

Only when useless feeders grow a spine will we liberate ourselves. Thank God for The Plan, Q, Q+ and all of the Patriots fighting for us! PRAY!

2
Dashmoomoo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where will we poop theb if not into the drinking supply!? The forest!? (Shit comment.)

8
trolltide 8 points ago +10 / -2

True. Look at asian cultures! Longevity cuz there’s bathrooms lol

4
inspoken 4 points ago +4 / -0

& they know which one to use too!

-2
PhDinNY -2 points ago +18 / -20

Tell that to the Native American populations virtually destroyed by small pox, or people who were still getting polio because their particular population didn't have access to the polio vaccine. Just because the covid shots are not vaccines does not mean that real vaccines have not been effective. Real vaccines are based on real science, and actually make sense; use the actual virus, but a deadened version, to make your immune system work against the live virus.

33
A_Lost_Fact 33 points ago +36 / -3

Nope. And please, imagine a nice popping sound at the end there. Vaccines increase virulity of the disease. It's called "rogue vaccine derived virus". It happened specifically with the polio vaccine, which continues to main and kill, even still today. Here's a collection of headlines a simple internet search will give you:

Vaccine-derived polio is on the rise...

Mutant Strains Of Polio Vaccine Now Cause More Paralysis ...

Wild Polio Wiped Out In Africa — But Vaccine-Derived Polio ...

Bill Gates' polio vaccine program caused 47,500 paralysis deaths in India...

UN Forced ToThat Admit That Gates-Funded Vaccine Is Causing Polio Outbreak In Africa...

It's always been this way. Always. Vaccines were never about health. So, happy hunting for the TRUTH about vacvines and polio to you!

7
JackieDaytona74 7 points ago +7 / -0

There's some gray here. Two points:

-Gates was using a new type of polio vaccine. Worse, I don't trust Gates to not intentionally sterilize and kill with the vaccines he funds. The problem here could be this particular vaccine and this particular man behind it and not evidence of there being a problem with vaccines in general.

-While rogue vaccine derived virus is a very real thing, statistically there are certain diseases where the data certainly points to a vaccine doing far, far more good than harm.

I do not challenge your bullet points. But I am challenging your assertion of "Nope" in response to PhDinNY's comment. For the very general, broad concept of vaccines, I think it's very dangerous to take an all or nothing approach here.

This is a nuanced problem at both a scientific level and political one, specifically the creation of vaccines by evil people that either through direct intent or greed cause very serious health issues. Evil behaviors by those in power and corrupt pharma companies have muddied the water here significantly.

Polio is an example where the data points to the original polio vaccine doing far more good than harm. And as a general concept of using weakened or dead virus to provoke an identical immune response, common sense should tell us that a good portion of the time that's going to have a positive effect when specifically dealing with a virus that has a high mortality rate and/or high serious injury rate.

For low mortality rate viruses, phenomena like RVDV can completely undermine the good that a GOOD vaccine can do, and there should be serious consideration about not producing vaccines for them.

Again, we have to follow the data and we have to appreciate the nuance. If a virus with a 70% mortality rate is rampaging through the population, there's no medicine that can stop it and a trustworthy scientific company is offering a vaccine that is based purely on weakened or dead virus, would you take it? I strongly suspect you would.

If we're going to talk about vaccines as a general concept, we have to parse out the machinations of evil men and we must look at the data with clear eyes. The data points to some vaccines doing some net positive, and that should not be ignored.

9
Tewdryg 9 points ago +10 / -1

"While rogue vaccine derived virus is a very real thing, statistically there are certain diseases where the data certainly points to a vaccine doing far, far more good than harm."

This is a well repeated myth. Credit rightfully belongs to plumbers, electricians, sandhogs, engineers and city planners for eliminating disease. Not vaxxines. It can be shown polio, small pox, measles, tuberculosis, tetanus, etc. were in free-fall decline before a vaxxine was developed. If anything, the vaxxines each time delayed the decline of these diseases.

4
JackieDaytona74 4 points ago +4 / -0

"It can be shown polio, small pox, measles, tuberculosis, tetanus, etc. were in free-fall decline before a vaxxine was developed. If anything, the vaxxines each time delayed the decline of these diseases."

Okay, but you've got to give me something in terms of data if you're going to assert such a claim.

9
Tewdryg 9 points ago +9 / -0

It took me a while to find it. It's obvious the government/pharmaceutical compnies don't want the history to be exposed. OMG, the "already been debunked" articles put out by the NIH, CDC, and others take up the top 50 for a web search. You'll get no where if you do a search on "sanitation versus Vaccines".

I regress. Somewhere in my 3-4 gigabytes of documents I have kept, there was a very interesting article showing the timelines with the declines in each disease and when the vaccine for it was introduced. It was always after a 90% decline of the disease when the vaccine was introduced. Here is a similar article explaining this. If you can wrap your mind around 'feces' contamination being the source for all these common diseases of the early 20th Century, then you can see as the sanitation infrastructure was built, the diseases declined because fecal contamination was being eliminated. It wasn't just the sanitation infrastructure that was built that greatly diminished diseases. It was the popularity of the automobile that effectively eliminated beast of burden transportation.

I regret the length of this response, but I believe it is important. To me itr is quite obvious that vaccines have never helped mankind. It is the biggest fraud for killing and maiming people in all of history.

Today, the most prevalent cause of disease is from environmental chemical toxins that attack the neurological system and cause cancer and auto-immune diseases, et. al. In 2002, Dr. Tom Mack of USC stated --

“My credentials include probably spending more time working up [analyses of] population-based outbreaks of smallpox than virtually anybody ever has.”

Mack then stated --

“If people are worried about endemic smallpox [long lingering or permanent presence of the disease in the population], it disappeared from this country not because of our mass herd immunity [derived from a vaccine]. It disappeared because of our economic development. And that’s why it disappeared from Europe and many other countries…[its disappearance is] not from universal vaccination.”

  • “The informed consent that you would have to prepare to vaccinate somebody in the public, if it’s honest, would have to say that dangers would exceed the benefits.”* BOOM.

“Most important determinant to the eventual number of [smallpox] cases is whether or not somebody gets put in the hospital. And everything should be done to prevent that.” “Unexposed [to the smallpox disease] community members have negligible risk. There is a substantial risk from a vaccine…It is the single most dangerous live vaccine.”

And much more so now with the mRNA vaccine.

Common diseases of the early part of the last Century were caused from the lack of sanitation and nutrition. The prevalence of animal husbandry, the reliance of domesticated animals for travel, the lack of sanitation infrastructure, hygiene, and good nutrition contributed to widespread diseases. Often the drinking water was taken from the same source as human and animal waste went into. The streets were covered in animal fecal matter. It was tracked in doors and it was everywhere. Think of the cities and towns with horse and oxen cart traffic on these paved and unpaved roads when it rained. The vast majority of common diseases were spread through fecal matter.

While smallpox captured the imagination with its high death rate and gross manifestations on victims' bodies, less obvious infections claimed even more lives. For example, eighteenth-century Philadelphians drank water contaminated with fecal matter, which resulted in endemic typhoid, dysentery, and other intestinal diseases. Since polio was primarily transmitted in fecal matter, by simply improving sanitation infrastructure reduced the occurrence of polio cases.

The increasing establishment of modern sanitation infrastructure, treated drinking water, and improved nutrition was the single most important reason why common diseases in America decreased dramatically beginning in the early part of the 20th century. By the 1950s and 1960s, the United States had the most modern and advanced sanitation infrastructure in the world. Disease precipitously dropped as a result. It was never the vaccines as the CDC and FDA claim that caused the drop in common diseases. They are committing fraud. It's all a damn lie. It can be easily shown, it was the improvement and expansion of sanitation infrastructure that best correlates with the decrease of common diseases. If anything, the vaccines delayed the drop of common diseases when they were introduced after the decrease had already started.

Good sanitation, good hygiene, and good nutrition is infinitely better at preventing disease than any and all vaccines ever invented.

5
Tewdryg 5 points ago +5 / -0

From Jon Rappaport's "AIDS, Inc." book.

For those denialists who cling to the notion that vaccines are remarkably safe and effective, this article is a pill you can swallow, bitter to be sure, but immunizing against the effects of bald lies from the bent medical establishment.

Understand: this is only a partial history of disasters and revelations, and it stops at 1988.

"The combined death rate from scarlet fever, diphtheria, whooping cough and measles among children up to fifteen shows that nearly 90 percent of the total decline in mortality between 1860 and 1965 had occurred before the introduction of antibiotics and widespread immunization. In part, this recession may be attributed to improved housing and to a decrease in the virulence of micro-organisms, but by far the most important factor was a higher host-resistance due to better nutrition." Ivan Illich, Medical Nemesis, Bantam Books, 1977

"In a recent British outbreak of whooping cough, for example, even fully immunized children contracted the disease in fairly large numbers; and the rates of serious complications and death were reduced only slightly. In another recent outbreak of pertussis, 46 of the 85 fully immunized children studied eventually contracted the disease."

"In 1977, 34 new cases of measles were reported on the campus of UCLA, in a population that was supposedly 91% immune, according to careful serological testing. Another 20 cases of measles were reported in the Pecos, New Mexico, area within a period of a few months in 1981, and 75% of them had been fully immunized, some of them quite recently. A survey of sixth-graders in a well-immunized urban community revealed that about 15% of this age group are still susceptible to rubella, a figure essentially identical with that of the pre-vaccine era."

"Finally, although the overall incidence of typical acute measles in the U.S. has dropped sharply from about 400,000 cases annually in the early 1960s to about 30,000 cases by 1974-76, the death rate remained exactly the same; and, with the peak incidence now occurring in adolescents and young adults, the risk of pneumonia and demonstrable liver abnormalities has actually increased substantially, according to one recent study, to well over 3% and 2%, respectively." Richard Moskowitz, MD, The Case Against Immunizations, 1983, American Institute of Homeopathy.

"Of all reported whooping cough cases between 1979 and 1984 in children over 7 months of age - that is, old enough to have received the primary course of the DPT shots (diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus) - 41% occurred in children who had received three or more shots and 22% in children who had one or two immunizations."

"Among children under 7 months of age who had whooping cough, 34% had been immunized between one and three times..."

"... Based on the only U.S. findings on adverse DPT reactions, an FDA-financed study at the University of California, Los Angeles, one out of every 350 children will have a convulsion; one in 180 children will experience high-pitched screaming [can indicate brain damage]; and one in 66 will have a fever of 105 degrees or more." Jennifer Hyman, Democrat and Chronicle, Rochester, New York, special supplement on DPT, dated April, 1987.

"A study undertaken in 1979 at the University of California, Los Angeles, under the sponsorship of the Food and Drug Administration, and which has been confirmed by other studies, indicates that in the U.S.A. approximately 1,000 infants die annually as a direct result of DPT vaccinations, and these are classified as SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) deaths. These represent about 10 to 15% of the total number of SIDS deaths occurring annually in the U.S.A. (between 8,000 and 10,000 depending on which statistics are used)." Leon Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, CW Daniel Company Limited, Saffron Walden, Essex, England, 1987.

"Assistant Secretary of Health Edward Brandt, Jr., MD, testifying before the U.S. Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources, rounded... figures off to 9,000 cases of convulsions, 9,000 cases of collapse, and 17,000 cases of high-pitched screaming for a total of 35,000 acute neurological reactions occurring within forty-eight hours of a DPT shot among America's children every year." DPT: A Shot in the Dark, by Harris L. Coulter and Barbara Loe Fischer, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

"While 70-80% of British children were immunized against pertussis in 1970-71, the rate is now 39%. The committee predicts that the next pertussis epidemic will probably turn out to be more severe than the one in 1974/75. However, they do not explain why, in 1970/71, there were more than 33,000 cases of pertussis with 41 fatal cases among the very well immunized British child population; whereas in 1974/75, with a declining rate of vaccination, a pertussis epidemic caused only 25,000 cases with 25 fatalities." Wolfgang Ehrengut, Lancet, Feb. 18, 1978, p. 370.

"... Barker and Pichichero, in a prospective study of 1232 children in Denver, Colorado, found after DTP that only 7% of those vaccinated were free from untoward reactions, which included pyrexia (53%), acute behavioral changes (82%), prolonged screaming (13%), and listlessness, anorexia and vomiting. 71% of those receiving second injections of DTP experienced two or more of the reactions monitored." Lancet, May 28, 1983, p. 1217

"Publications by the World Health Organization show that diphtheria is steadily declining in most European countries, including those in which there has been no immunization. The decline began long before vaccination was developed. There is certainly no guarantee that vaccination will protect a child against the disease; in fact, over 30,000 cases of diphtheria have been recorded in the United Kingdom in fully immunized children." Leon Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, p. 58.

"Pertussis (whooping cough) immunization is controversial, as the side effects have received a great deal of publicity. The counter claim is that the effectiveness and protection offered by the procedure far outweigh the possible ill effects... annual deaths, per million children, from this disease over the period from 1900 to the mid-nineteen seventies, shows that from a high point of just under 900 deaths per million children (under age 15) in 1905, the decline has been consistent and dramatic. There had been a lowering of mortality rates of approximately 80% by the time immunization was introduced on a mass scale, in the mid-nineteen fifties. The decline has continued, albeit at a slower rate, ever since. No credit can be given to vaccination for the major part of the decline since it was not in use." Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, p. 63.

"... the swine-flu vaccination program was one of its (CDC) greatest blunders. It all began in 1976 when CDC scientists saw that a virus involved in a flu attack outbreak at Fort Dix, N.J., was similar to the swine-flu virus that killed 500,000 Americans in 1918. Health officials immediately launched a 100-million dollar program to immunize every American. But the expected epidemic never materialized, and the vaccine led to partial paralysis in 532 people. There were 32 deaths." U.S. News and World Report, Joseph Carey, October 14, 1985, p. 70, "How Medical Sleuths Track Killer Diseases."

"Despite (cases) in which (smallpox) vaccination plainly failed to protect the population, and despite the rampant side-effects of the methods, the proponents of vaccination continued their attempts to justify the methods by claims that the disease had declined in Europe as a whole during the period of its compulsory use. If the decline could be correlated with the use of the vaccination, then all else could be set aside, and the advantage between its current low incidence could be shown to outweigh the periodic failures of the method, and to favour the continued use of vaccination. However, the credit for the decline in the incidence of smallpox could not be given to vaccination. The fact is that its incidence declined in all parts of Europe, whether or not vaccination was employed." Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, pp. 6-7.

"Smallpox, like typhus, has been dying out (in England) since 1780. Vaccination in this country has largely fallen into disuse since people began to realize how its value was discredited by the great smallpox epidemic of 1871-2 (which occurred after extensive vaccination)." W. Scott Webb, A Century of Vaccination, Swan Sonnenschein, 1898.

"In this incident (Kyoto, Japan, 1948) - the most serious of its kind - a toxic batch of alum-precipitated toxoid (APT) was responsible for illness in over 600 infants and for no fewer than 68 deaths."

"On 20 and 22 October, 1948, a large number of babies and children in the city of Kyoto received their first injection of APT. On the 4th and 5th of November, 15,561 babies and children aged some months to 13 years received their second dose. One to two days later, 606 of those who had been injected fell ill. Of these, 9 died of acute diphtheritic paralysis in seven to fourteen days, and 59 of late paralysis mainly in four to seven weeks." Sir Graham Wilson, Hazards of Immunization, Athone Press, University of London, 1967.

"Accidents may, however, follow the use of this so-called killed (rabies) vaccine owing to inadequate processing. A very serious occurrence of this sort occurred at Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil, in 1960. No fewer than 18 out of 66 persons vaccinated with Fermi's carbolized (rabies ) vaccine suffered from encephalomyelitis and every one of the eighteen died." Sir Graham Wilson, Hazards of Immunization.

"At a press conference in Washington on 24 July, 1942, the Secretary of War reported that 28,585 cases of jaundice had been observed in the (American) Army between 1 January and 4 July after yellow fever vaccination, and of these 62 proved fatal." Wilson, Hazards of Immunization.

"The world's biggest trial (conducted in south India) to assess the value of BCG tuberculosis vaccine has made the startling revelation that the vaccine 'does not give any protection against bacillary forms of tuberculosis.' The study said to be 'most exhaustive and meticulous,' was launched in 1968 by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) with assistance from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta, Georgia."

"The incidence of new cases among the BCG vaccinated group was slightly (but statistically insignificantly) higher than in the control group, a finding that led to the conclusion that BCG's protective effect 'was zero.'" New Scientist, November 15, 1979, as quoted by Hans Ruesch in Naked Empress, Civis Publishers, Switzerland, 1982.

"Between 10 December 1929 and 30 April 1930, 251 of 412 infants born in Lubeck received three doses of BCG vaccine by the mouth during the first ten days of life. Of these 251, 72 died of tuberculosis, most of them in two to five months and all but one before the end of the first year. In addition, 135 suffered from clinical tuberculosis but eventually recovered; and 44 became tuberculin-positive but remained well. None of the 161 unvaccinated infants born at the time was affected in this way and none of these died of tuberculosis within the following three years." Hazards of Immunization, Wilson.

"We conducted a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial to test the efficacy of the 14-valent pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide vaccine in 2295 high-risk patients... Seventy-one episodes of proved or probable pneumococcal pneumonia or bronchitis occurred among 63 of the patients (27 placebo recipients and 36 vaccine recipients)... We were unable to demonstrate any efficacy of the pneumococcal vaccine in preventing pneumonia or bronchitis in this population." New England Journal of Medicine, November 20, 1986, p

3
CokeOrPepe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dude, A+++

2
MW_Freedom 2 points ago +2 / -0

For the supporting data go to the youtube video referenced in this thread:

https://greatawakening.win/p/140vaFtTS0/history-of-vaccines--incredible-/

"Modern" vaccine discussion starts at about the 11:45 mark.

2
Canadianguy17 2 points ago +2 / -0

I guess it can be said... Where is your data that you stood so firmly upon just a moment ago? Would be nice to see why you're defending them.

1
DickAllcocks 1 point ago +1 / -0

This. No one has even seen many of these viruses. They largely exist “quantitatively”. There are tons of people who never caught many of them because they boiled their drinking water. Ffs the Mongols were some of the dirtiest people when it came to basic hygiene and they didn’t have issues with most of these diseases simply because they never drank dirty water.

3
WakeUpWorld 3 points ago +3 / -0

Vaccine companies don't do studies to see if a group of vaxxed vs unvaxxed have other health problems over long term. So we don't know if they do good really. It may help lessen the disease you took the vax for, but it may have given you a whole list of other ailments you would not have had. They don't do these studies because they know what they will find.

2
uk9994 2 points ago +4 / -2

Bitchute why you can't catch a virus.. No virus ever in the world has ever been isolated.its a moneymaking depopulation scam

14
ApplesOrangesLemons 14 points ago +14 / -0

And to add, do you still trust the flu shot? It's a "vaccine" that doesn't do much.

15
Litecola2 15 points ago +15 / -0

Every family we convince to stop getting the injections stop getting sick and then go telling more people.

Studies proved that the more shots people get, year after year, the more susceptible they are to other flus and diseases.

4
PhDinNY 4 points ago +4 / -0

I only got the flu shot once in my life, before I knew much about them. Note that, at least in the past, they were called "flu shots", not "flu vaccinations", and "tetanus shots" not tetanus vaccinations. Tetanus, being a bacteria, could likely never have a real vaccine. I think the truth on true vaccines lies somewhere between the "all vaccines are poison" and "vaccines are the greatest medical breakthrough in history" :)

2
freeDacian 2 points ago +2 / -0

except for spreading new variants, increasing the flu resistance to the pills prescribed and basically working for big pharma.

7
ArcaneSlang 7 points ago +8 / -1

Let’s discuss how polio vaccines were contaminated with viruses and the cancer that ensued. Vaccines have never deserved the altruistic philosophy attributed them in my opinion. The gross negligence of the science behind the smallpox vaccine and Dr Edward Jenner unethically testing it on a small boy is simply the basis of this ‘science.’ Tell me how you came to trust the polio and “real vaccines based on real science” please begin by defining what real science is in order that we fundamentally understand exact terms and usage,

2
JackieDaytona74 2 points ago +3 / -1

Very well said, AS. You sum up my thoughts above in a much more concise fashion. We have to look at this subject in a nuanced fashion.

1
ArcaneSlang 1 point ago +2 / -1

I don’t think PhDinNY appreciates it. All he could do is downvote. Methinks the phd is a delusion of grandeur!

4
Datadude 4 points ago +4 / -0

How true, bewilders me how people can assign motive to the tool. The intent always lies in the hand that wields it.

3
StanceDancing 3 points ago +3 / -0

Europeans domesticated animals. Animals have horrible diseases. When Europeans came to America they decimated the natives because their immune systems couldnt handle what the Europeans were hardy to, because of their years around animal shit.

67
LilyBee24 67 points ago +67 / -0

One of my daycare babies died from 'SIDS'. She was an angel. Only 5 months old. We lost my 1st husband the same year from drug addiction overdose that started with doctor meds. 2009 was awful for me. To say I want to see the pharmaceutical industry suffer would be an understatement. I wish for them to be obliterated.

13
Forthelead 13 points ago +14 / -1

I used to think that public hanging would be sufficient for these guys, but the more I learn about their absolute callousness, the more I'm leaning to hooking them up to an IV and staking them to an ant hill.

I realize that vengeance belongs to God and that my attitude likely needs to be reoriented, but the amount of suffering these people have brought to other humans around the world is impossible to fully comprehend.

9
LilyBee24 9 points ago +9 / -0

They all deserve what William Wallace suffered. That should be pay per viewed. But I agree; it is up to God to punish them ultimately & I feel sinful asking for their punishment to be severe. Freedom from their devilish plans, at least, would be great.

7
lsvogel 7 points ago +7 / -0

My neighbors baby boy - 5 months was SIDs. She said he was sleeping in later than usual and when she went to get him up, she saw his lips were blue, she just knew he had died. Sad...

3
LilyBee24 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's absolutely awful. I know another couple who were accused of smothering their baby in their sleep. I often wonder if that 1 was vaccine related as well.

Do you still have contact with the neighbor? Wondering if they have any other children and any other vaccine injuries?

5
BigFreedomBoner 5 points ago +5 / -0

SIDS is the biggest anxiety as a new parent. I know it is true. But I still don't want to believe it is true. It is so bad.

I do believe I had an aunt born in the 30s who died at 7 months from a vax. they claimed it was scarlet fever. Not instantaneous but developed over 24 hours or thereabouts. It came up out of nowhere, doc did get to her, but said "nothing I can do." She died in my grandmother's arms.

What sucks is people forget how many aunts we have. I have to remind them that that "we have three, and one is our precious Constance."

41
HermitAu 41 points ago +41 / -0

First thing that comes to mind: Tetanus cases were nearly nonexistant and skyrocketed to a "new normal" after a vaccine was created. Tetanus rates had actually declined exponentially in the decades leading up to the creation of the vaccine simply due to better sanitation. There's no proof the vaccine prevents tetanus or ever did.

I watched a 4 hour long testimony by a former vaccine researcher who had been working with the government since the 50's I believe. The video seemed old if I recall, maybe from the 90's or 2000's. That testimony was like a bottle of red pills regarding the history of the vaccine industry. It runs sooooo much deeper than Autism etc.. I can't find it, maybe someone knows the video and can provide a link?

24
400DollarHandcart 24 points ago +24 / -0

Same for fluoride, it began being used in toothpaste and water supplies shortly after WW2. It was credited with greatly improving the dental health of the country. Of course, you also had hundreds of thousands men who were taught basic oral hygiene in boot camp coming back home. Also, wartime factories that needed new goods to mass produce like toothbrushes. The United States Government found out that the Russians were putting fluoride in the water in their military prison camps, and it made the prisoners, not docile but rather more willing to comply with commands. So, fluoride was added to the American water supply. Yes, it may slightly improve teeth enamel, but that is not the reason for the giant leap in oral health after the war. Fluoride is a fun rabbit hole to go down. Did you know that the drug Prozac is 18% by weight Fluoride.

12
Litecola2 12 points ago +12 / -0

No study ever showed improvement due to fluoride, but many studies show ill health effects of fluoride.

And go ahead and call poison info lines, ask if it's bad that a kid ate a bottle of toothpaste, or even an adult, and see what they tell you.

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +3 / -1

Well, most will tell you that you'll have an upset stomach for a while as an adult.

It's kids that have the highest risk.

9
JackieDaytona74 9 points ago +9 / -0

Drives me nuts that people look at you like a crazy person when you mention that fluoride isn't good for you and shouldn't be added to our water. Decades of brainwashing.

The problem is that fluoride is very difficult to filter out of water. About a year ago I bought a fluoride filtering water pitcher and I'm very happy with it so far. The downside is that the filters are very slow and quite expensive (around $40-45 per filter). Although a filter is good for about 6 months.

If anyone is interested, this is the pitcher I bought and they do post a 3rd party lab analysis document showing the efficacy: https://purewaterfreedom.com/fluoride-filters/water-pitcher.html

I have no stake, claim or association with the company. Just a product that I'm happy with and based on the lab analysis, seems to do a very good job of removing fluoride and other bad stuff from your water. I will say that there's a ton of chlorine in the municipal water in my city and chlorine is another very difficult element to filter out of water with a physical filter. I cannot smell even a slight hint of chlorine in the water the pitcher/filter produces.

5
ThePowerOfPrayer 5 points ago +5 / -0

We installed a reverse osmosis system when we moved into our current house, but I know the price of those systems can be cost prohibitive.

At our old home, we had 5 gallon bottles of spring water delivered and had a dispenser with a hot water tap like you see in offices. That's a much cheaper initial cost but it adds up over time.

Ceramic filters like the Berkey or your flouride filtering pitcher are also an option.

You can also create your own Berkey style filter on the cheap by using food grade plastic buckets and replacement Berkey filters-

https://thesafehealthyhome.com/make-a-diy-berkey-water-filter/

3
JackieDaytona74 3 points ago +3 / -0

You bring up a really important point that I should have mentioned, PoP. I've heard that a good reverse-osmosis system can remove a good 90% of the fluoride from the water. The next home I purchase will definitely have a reverse osmosis system added to it.

The reverse osmosis system is especially appealing to me because I'm the only person in the house that refills the damn pitcher! My wife and son tend to stay on the "demand" side of things rather than the "supply" side when it comes to the filtered water.

But at least they use the thing lol.

1
Mutti2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you! I’ve long wanted to buy a Berkeley but the cost held me back.

1
Canadianguy17 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bro..... Distillation.

Exactly like Rain.

Look to nature or God's creation to find the answer to your problems.

7
Fuhqreddit 7 points ago +7 / -0

Sodium Flouride(what they treat our water with) is bad, Calcium Flouride actually fortifies teeth.

I've yet to meet a dentist that doesn't look at me like a retard when I say this.

4
uk9994 4 points ago +4 / -0

Do you know fluoride causes cancers more rapidly than anything else?

1
WakeUpWorld 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wasn't it the Germans, not the Russians

1
400DollarHandcart 1 point ago +1 / -0

Truth be told I couldn’t remember when I was writing. Both executed most of their prisoners of war so I just picked one, you are probably right.

17
DontTreadOnPede 17 points ago +17 / -0

Here is some of the information about the tetanus vaccine:

https://www.naturalblaze.com/2013/05/why-you-never-need-tetanus-vaccine.html

Some quotes from that article:

"The following is taken from the Medical Press, Nov 3, 1948. “The not infrequent failure of tetanus anti-toxin prophylactically is indicated by the fact that deaths from tetanus occur in 7% of civilian cases and 50% of military cases, in spite of its use.” From the Medical History of the Second World War, Medicine and Pathology, we note, “It is disappointing to find that the case mortality is the same as in 1914-18. There is still no convincing evidence that anti-tetanic serum possesses curative value.”"

"The tetanus bacterium is ubiquitous. It is not here today gone tomorrow. It is found on the surface of the body, in the mouth, in the gastro-intestinal tract, in house dust and clothing."

"It is not the bacterium itself that causes the development of tetanus but the toxins it produces under anaerobic conditions. “Under normal conditions, no disease will occur if spores are introduced into a wound.”(J. Ark Med Soc Vol 80, No 3 p134) and “It is the compromised host, or traumatised patient, either by surgery or accident, who is most apt to develop tetanus.” (J Foot Surgery Vol 23, No 3 p235)."

"The vaccine is made from the tetanus toxoid inactivated with formaldehyde. To produce the toxoid the bacterium is cultured in liquid medium in large-capacity fermenters. The medium consists of digestive enzymes of milk protein, allegedly free of contaminants, which is harvested by filtration, purified and detoxified. The vaccine also contains aluminium hydroxide or phosphate, which acts as an adjuvant (any substance used in conjunction with another to enhance its activity), and thimerorsal, a mercury-containing compound, is found in the ingredients of some of the DTaP formulations which is claimed to prevent bacterial contaminant overgrowth."

4
PhDinNY 4 points ago +4 / -0

Tetanus shots were never called vaccinations, as far as I know, so it makes sense that there would be information showing they don't really work.

3
Litecola2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Docs have been calling them vaxxes lately tho. Not sure why. and they're pushing them harder, at least from where I see.

7
tobeselfevident 7 points ago +7 / -0

They've created such a strong narrative around the safety of vaccines that now they call anything they want to sell in a syringe a vaccine.

3
freeDacian 3 points ago +3 / -0

I watched parts of it and know what you speak of. Medicine is hijacked as education to be used against humanity!

3
Im-Wide-Awake 3 points ago +3 / -0

What do you mean? Tetanus has been around for a looong time, and is incredibly dangerous

9
HermitAu 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yes, but the rates of tetanus increased significantly after scientists started messing with it ~100 years ago. I'm sure I recall this being said and wish I could find the testimony video.

In the meantime, here's an alternative perspective:

"Tetanus incidence and mortality declined by more than 99 percent prior to the development of the tetanus vaccine in the 1940s. This decline is cited from medical sources in the book Vaccines: Are They Really Safe and Effective? by Neil Z. Miller:

“During the mid-1800s, there were 205 cases of tetanus per 100,000 wounds among U.S. military personnel. By the early 1900s, this rate had declined to 16 cases per 100,000 wounds--a 92 percent reduction. During the mid-1940s, the incidence of tetanus dropped even further to .44 cases per 100,000 wounds. Some researchers attribute this decline to an increased attention to wound hygiene.”

Post tetanus vaccine history It is clear that knowledge of sanitation and wound hygiene are the main factors decreasing both the incidence and death rate of tetanus. While the tetanus vaccine was allegedly developed to prevent tetanus, there is no proof this vaccine has ever prevented a single case of tetanus. Tetanus is a problem of wound hygiene; not vaccination status"

https://proliberty.com/observer/20100317.htm

1
Voteordie 1 point ago +4 / -3

Isn’t it far more likely that science became better at diagnosing tetanus 100 years ago? Its also fair to say World War 1 had a pretty big impact on that as well

It’s the same thing with autism, did it grow because of vaccines or because we got better at diagnosing (and also they expanded what was considered signs of autism) and because parents stopped being pussies about their kids not being perfect and free of issues.

3
HermitAu 3 points ago +3 / -0

I added more to my post, please check out the link. I may be incorrectly remembering the claim of a drastic increase post vaccine. I will try to dig and find the video in question. However it is clear that tetanus rates dropped to an almost insignificant number before the vaccine was created. 66% of tetanus cases were among vaccinated in one study and there doesn't seem to be any direct proof that the vaccine has ever prevented a case of tetanus.

-1
Voteordie -1 points ago +1 / -2

How would you have direct proof of any vaccine preventing a disease? You can only base efficacy off of community sample sizes because you need a control group. Is that what kind of proof you are talking about?

Also, if the vaccine isn’t effective AND tetanus wasn’t a concern, why would anyone think that is a good vaccine to create? Where is the profit opportunity? You’d have to spend billions creating a panic to maybe break even years and years later.

3
tobeselfevident 3 points ago +3 / -0

People are concerned about whatever doctors and the news tell them to be concerned about. We've only had the internet since the 90s, there was no way for truth to cut through the bullshit back then like there is now.

-1
Voteordie -1 points ago +1 / -2

That doesn’t answer my question, it just brings up a tangential discussion. Why did the craven pharma companies choose a low-risk disease to create a dummy vaccine for? Why spend money manufacturing fear when there were plenty of diseases that were being passed around all the time. You said yourself that the vaccine doesnt work so why would it matter if they created a dummy vaccine for any other virus?

Why tetanus?

Let’s say they wanted to manufacture outrage over a minimally dangerous disease, why make an ineffective/dummy vaccine? Why not make an effective one that you can point to and say “See! 100% efficacy, Trust me on everything else I make because this item works great!” The profit/control motive is actually apparent in my scenario, yours makes no sense.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

Really? You asked that after what we just saw and are seeing with COVID and the vaccinations?

-2
Voteordie -2 points ago +1 / -3

I’m not seeing anything with the vaccinations, family, friends, co-workers, all fine.

1
Im-Wide-Awake 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doesn’t that just indicate that people were better at finding it though? Of course sanitary conditions helped to curb rates of infection, but I don’t see how you figure that the vaccine helped to cause tetanus disease

3
HermitAu 3 points ago +3 / -0

Rates declined significantly between the 1850's and 1900 and again between 1900 and the 1940's so no I don't think improvement in detection was a factor. It was almost nonexistant by the time the vaccine came around to save the day.

It seems the key takeaway is that improved sanitation and wound cleaning essentially wiped out tetanus, not the vaccine. As for my indication that the vaccine caused an increase, I can't find the video to back it up and it's possible I was mistaken.

2
Im-Wide-Awake 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think it's pretty likely you might be mistaken. Additionally, while sanitation certainly played a part in reducing cases, that doesn't rule out that the vaccines are/were ineffective.

1
tobeselfevident 1 point ago +2 / -1

Why do you think it's pretty likely that he might be mistaken? Because you've been hearing how great vaccines are your whole life but never really looked into why, like he has?

1
Im-Wide-Awake 1 point ago +1 / -0

Based on the lack of evidence to support the claim, and the abundance of evidence to the contrary.

1
GetsTheNogginJoggin 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m supposed to get a tetanus booster this year…

10
HermitAu 10 points ago +10 / -0

Before you do, a 2016 study suggested a booster every 30 years instead of 10 and a more recent one suggested the booster is useless if you were fully vaccinated as a child.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/02/200225075120.htm

https://news.ohsu.edu/2016/03/22/study-shows-tetanus-shots-needed-every-30-years-not-every-10

4
GetsTheNogginJoggin 4 points ago +4 / -0

Bless you, thank you for this. I was already hesitating on getting it this year. This is solid info.

4
bizarroworldrefugee 4 points ago +4 / -0

I believe I was vax injured by the tetanus vaccine. I can't say for sure because they also gave me a flu vaccine at the same time. But I had flu vaccines previously with no adverse reactions.

-2
uk9994 -2 points ago +1 / -3

You get what people call flu as a reaction to your immune system detoxing. It is not a virus and n any case viruses are neiher contagious or able to exist outside the body being only a soapy sort of substance

For people to take painkillers to bring down a fever defeats nature detoxing..is coming sweat as a way to remove toxins

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

You really don't have bodily functions correct. Your body will go too far to "cleanse" itself, and that can result in dangerously high fevers.

If you do not treat these fevers and keep them from worsening, you risk permanent damage or death.

It's not something to mess around with, and it's actually false information to say that "taking painkillers defeats nature detoxing".

Fever suppressants are important if your fever continues to develop.

If you are hitting 100+ degrees, you should be considering a suppressant because when that ticks over to ~104 nature is no longer "detoxing", your body will destroy itself to try and destroy the invading bacteria or virus.

0
uk9994 0 points ago +1 / -1

When a fever breaks then the healing process has worked. You sound like someone trained through the Rockefeller center medical industrial complex and what they teach is rubbish.

Viruses are not contagious...they are not alive..don't have a neurological system and can't exist outside the body. Think of them as a solvent ....this is why they cannot be contagious.

2
SharonaZamboni 2 points ago +2 / -0

I didn’t know that adults scheduled tetanus shots. I’ve always heard of getting a shot after some sort of puncture wound or cuts, etc.

1
GetsTheNogginJoggin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah you’re “supposed to” get boosted every ten years.

1
SharonaZamboni 1 point ago +1 / -0

Guess I’m waaay behind schedule.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's okay. There are various studies that show it does nothing, or it does something and it's 10 years, or it does something and 20, 30, etc. or it does something permanently and doesn't require a booster.

26
TNBanjoMan 26 points ago +26 / -0

Recently learned that unvaccinated people got covid at a far lower rate than vaccinated, and boosted. The chart was posted here on GAW, and no, I'm not going to run it down.

8
ApplesOrangesLemons 8 points ago +8 / -0

Source: https://www.walgreens.com/businesssolutions/covid-19-index.jsp

You have to click next on the bottom of the graphics until you get to page 3 of 5

2
TNBanjoMan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup that's it...thanks anon.

1
SpaceManBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

My first thought was that people who aren't getting the jab would be less likely to get tested but if you swap to "proportion of tests" they actually have the highest percentage of total tests out of any of the groups.

1
fastwalker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow. Incredible link.

6
trolltide 6 points ago +7 / -1

Lmfaooooooo yea cuz ADE. Strange how doctors fucking ignore the shit out of that. There’s a fucking reason why yellow fever doesn’t have a vaccine. Why RSV has no vaccine. Ridiculous

2
Enlightenment_Now 2 points ago +2 / -0

There’s a fucking reason why yellow fever doesn’t have a vaccine.

Yellow Fever does have a vaccine. I know this because I took it. It was the last vaccine I ever took, and it was decades ago.

https://www.cdc.gov/yellowfever/vaccine/index.html

"A safe and effective yellow fever vaccine has been available for more than 80 years.

A single dose provides lifelong protection for most people. The vaccine is a live, weakened form of the virus given as a single shot."

1
trolltide 1 point ago +1 / -0

oh my god I need to study. it's ... DENGUE FEVER???? smh. sorry. this is why i get Q's wrong ._.

24
Bama50 24 points ago +26 / -2

That pretty much any "disease " that makes people sick is caused by vaccines.

16
Yeetthedems 16 points ago +16 / -0

I’m the second oldest of six kids, the four born after me have received ZERO vaccines. My older brother and I got a few but my mother stopped at ages 2/3 for us.

My younger siblings have had ZERO health issues, ZERO instances of “childhood sickness” and they’ve all made it to adulthood without being maimed or harmed by pharmaceuticals. None of us have experienced any sickness that vaccines claim to eradicate.

1
trolltide 1 point ago +9 / -8

No. Just no. No. People have autoimmune diseases before vaccines were invented. This is completely false.

6
CokeOrPepe 6 points ago +6 / -0

People are mysteriously coming down with autoimmune diseases immediately after getting the experimental mRNA injections. Directly caused by them.

1
trolltide 1 point ago +1 / -0

yes! i can prove it w/article

2
Buttery 2 points ago +3 / -1

8 updoots, assuming they're in good faith, disagree with you. Wish any of them would actually speak up.

3
trolltide 3 points ago +5 / -2

Yes please reply. Misinformation on both sides. Let’s clear up as much as possible. I would like to support Q publicly but not when ppl on our side are … so so terribly malinformed.

4
Sunshines09 4 points ago +4 / -0

Even Q said not all vaccines are bad.

2
trolltide 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes! But soon they will be. They’re already doing shingles to mrna. It’ll kill a lot of old ppl

3
Mutti2 3 points ago +3 / -0

I beat shingles in 2.5 weeks with zinc, vitamin c and Benadryl to help me sleep. I also used Benadryl cream and antibiotic cream on the box with lots of dollar stor bandaids.

No nerve damage. No after effects. Thanks google search.

2
trolltide 2 points ago +2 / -0

i need to look into benadryl cream. i had NO IDEA they made that as a cream. huh.

2
Sunshines09 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, I've seen this mentioned before also. I don't see how even a normie could support this one. It's not like the COVID vaccine is any good, why use this technology in others?

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because the media and Fauci say they're good.

1
trolltide 1 point ago +1 / -0

kill pplz

1
tobeselfevident 1 point ago +2 / -1

Show them where they're so so terribly malinformed.

1
SpaceManBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hard when people simply downvote and run instead of replying with anything.

0
trolltide 0 points ago +2 / -2

For one, covid exists. Idk wtf it means to say “it’s not isolated.” Ugh. Look at some electro microscope pix smhhhhhh. Also snake water. That whole thing makes my eye twitch. Ugh.

1
tobeselfevident 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yeah I'm not really on board with the whole snake water thing. It sounds like an attempt to stop people from looking harder at parasites if anything, which we were all starting to do not too long ago, but when you say Covid has been isolated, and you tell me to look at some elctro microscope pics of it, do you know where I could see those? If I did would I even know what I was looking at? Would you? Why are so many people saying viruses haven't been isolated--what do they mean by that and what about that do you disagree with? How would you know that what you're looking at in an electron microscope is actually a virus and not what some are now referring to as exosomes (i.e., the stuff your body releases when it's sick, not the thing that's making it sick).

I'm all ears on this stuff. I'm not arguing with you. These are good faith questions. You seem confident in your position. Tell me and show me why, please.

2
trolltide 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7224615/

Pic. And yeh it's the circly thingy.

It has the dimensions and the spikes

1
trolltide 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't do the scanning electron microscopes tho, so I can't verify it myself. Just like I can't verify that my bank has my money if I want to withdraw it. But I trust it because it makes sense, because the dimensions are there and verifiable.

0
ThePowerOfPrayer 0 points ago +1 / -1

As if there aren't retarded Antifa folks.

0
worldowedexplanation 0 points ago +1 / -1

A lot of “autoimmune” diseases are just hidden infections (or intentionally misdiagnosed ones) like borrelia, parasites, Bartonella, Babesia, RMSF, etc

1
trolltide 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m not a rheumatologist but with autoimmune stuff you look at labwork and uhhhhhhhhhhhhh biopsies so it’s hard to unintentionally misdianose because of, well, labwork and biopsies

-6
Voteordie -6 points ago +7 / -13

This is retard level misunderstanding of disease lol

CanCEr DiDN’t ExISt UnTil We StARtEd DiAgNOsiNg It

0
uk9994 0 points ago +3 / -3

Cancers...some cancers...lumps...are the body wrapping up stuff to be dealt with later

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-1
Voteordie -1 points ago +2 / -3

You’re kidding right?

2
Lurkedtoolong 2 points ago +2 / -0

Some believe cancer is a natural and beneficial process that just didn’t stop when it was supposed to. Example: the fast growing tissue that first attaches a fertilized egg to a woman’s uterus will test positive as cancer. It serves its purpose to make the pregnancy possible until replaced by slower growing cells.

-2
Voteordie -2 points ago +1 / -3

Some believe lobotomy’s were a beneficial practice, that doesn’t mean it isn’t a terrible Medical practice with zero benefit. People believe stupid things because they don’t understand what they’re talking about.

0
uk9994 0 points ago +3 / -3

No ..not at all. It has been known for a long time. The immune system can deal with cancers but in the period when people get symptoms and see a doctor etc is when the healing phase has begun...what kills people is if there's a long period of time and patient isn't eating enough proteins etc to keep immune system going and also is having bits butchered and chemotherapy which totally destroys thecimmune system.

When people think they are I'll..have a disease is really the immune system expelling toxins in sweat mucus coughing etc. They think these symptoms are flu instead of healing them. We need to learn how to help heal our bodies and support immune system

1
worldowedexplanation 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agree with this completely, after 3 years of my body being sick as hell from killing Lyme and Bartonella. I sweat the most disgusting, toxic smell out of my body from dead bacteria as my immune system kicks out this shit.

And I am not on antibiotics!

1
uk9994 1 point ago +2 / -1

How are antibiotics still for sale? They are so bad for you! Immune systemvwiped out...doctors should issue probiotics if they continue to dish them out

-2
Voteordie -2 points ago +1 / -3

This is so wrong, it’s sad. A simple argument for why medicine has worked is the extended average lifespan and the extended quality of life. When all we did was “rely on our immune system” people were dying at 35…

Chemo side effects can certainly shorten your life but cancer that has metastasized is a death sentence, no way around it. If you don’t want to take chemo, that’s fine but you are going to more than likely die within a year regardless as the cancer spreads and shuts down system, causes blood clots, and overtakes healthy cells.

0
uk9994 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hats not why we died early...poor or non existent sanitation dirty water bad food wok in dangerous conditions....ia polio vaccine tha stopped polio it was on its way ou thanks to improved sanitation

-2
Voteordie -2 points ago +1 / -3

Oh of course, everything happens in a vacuum right?

23
impera 23 points ago +23 / -0

There are a large number of doctors who have both spoken against vaccines, and who have at a later time have died in mysterious circumstances. Way before the china virus was on anyone's radar.

Would an industry that cold-bloodily planned the murder of a billion people hesitate at a couple dozen assassinations of professional people who were calling attention to their misdeeds?

4
CirclebackGinger 4 points ago +4 / -0

Also, why would they have needed Congress and Reagan to pass a Bill protecting big pharma from being liable for vaccine injuries? If the pharmaceutical companies were doing more good than harm and were honest and ethical, they would stand behind their product w/ confidence knowing that lawsuits would be few and far between b/c the vaccines, etc., that they produce really are safe and effective. If vaccine injury so rarely happens and is the unicorn tale of conspiracy theorists, pharmaceutical companies wouldn’t need liability protection from the general public. 🤷🏼‍♀️

3
Im-Wide-Awake 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can you share a list of these doctors? Is there a database where I can learn more?

10
impera 10 points ago +10 / -0

I once had a nice old-style HTML page with a list for the stories of their deaths & articles at one time. Did a bit of searching and while I cant find the list I recall, there are others with similar details that also remark upon the trend.

https://www.stevequayle.com/index.php?s=146

https://prepareforchange.net/2016/02/20/list-of-over-100-dead-microbiologists/

https://skeptoid.com/blog/2015/07/28/is-big-pharma-killing-holistic-doctors/

I added the last link for a bit of healthy contrast, its written by none other than Mike Rothchild whose name many here will recognize.. and knowing this, I dare say one can extrapolate and deduce his stated position.

1
Im-Wide-Awake 1 point ago +2 / -1

Most of these have very little if anything to do with vaccines though...don't really see how these are related.

1
impera 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah there was a more specific group of people I had in mind. Apologies for not being able to pluck that one out of the mire.. will try and think more about it and craft some more specific queries a bit later.

1
Im-Wide-Awake 1 point ago +1 / -0

No worries! Hope you understand though that I'm not gonna take your word that what you're saying is correct though. I did some digging too and I'm not really seeing any proof of the claim

2
impera 2 points ago +2 / -0

So having shown a lot of the lists here, maybe 'holistic' or 'natropathic' doctors was a more clear and correct descriptor. Being opposed to needless nonsense medical practice, all of these segments have very clear opposition to vaccines but as you say, maybe its not quite explicit enough for your liking.

0
Im-Wide-Awake 0 points ago +1 / -1

I don't see how many of them would even be considered to be 'holistic' or 'natropathic' though. I mean the very first man on the list was a former WHO director. Microbiology is far from something that would be considered 'holistic.' Hell, #62 was one who was even studying the efficacy of an AIDS vaccine, so definitely wouldn't be considered a person who has a clear opposition to vaccines.

Did you go through the list yourself?

1
tobeselfevident 1 point ago +2 / -1

This is a Q board. Nobody expects anyone to take any claims at face value. One could argue that is the entire point of the Q posts in the first place--to restore critical thinking to the world and get people to trust themselves to sift through the data and the bullshit and arrive at correct conclusions on their own.

1
uk9994 1 point ago +2 / -1

None of them would use vaccines. Holistic doctors understand how the body works and as they train extra five years than a doctor knowcthatvyou cannot catch a virus.

Bitchute. Why you can't catch a virus video

1
Im-Wide-Awake 1 point ago +1 / -0

How do you figure none of these people would use vaccines?

1
uk9994 1 point ago +2 / -1

Naturapsths learn about the human body etc Ayurvedic medicine doesn't believe in vaxx either or traditional Chinese medicine etc

0
Im-Wide-Awake 0 points ago +1 / -1

Many of the people listed here don't appear to be Naturapaths, nor have they spoken out against vaccines.

Overall I'm just reaally not sure how this all ties in.

3
1
Im-Wide-Awake 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting enough! But just one doesn’t really support the claim of this being a targeted thing. This is far from the only doctor to speak out against vaccines, and moreover this is well before the covid vaccine became a big point of discussion.

I appreciate the link though!

2
Starseed 2 points ago +2 / -0

and moreover this is well before the covid vaccine became a big point of discussion.

Thats kinda the point, no? To kill off and scare whistleblowers before it gets mainstream?

-2
Im-Wide-Awake -2 points ago +1 / -3

It would make sense if there was a continued pattern, but there isn't. The original comment said there was a "large list," but the list of those who still speak out against vaccines but aren't dead appears to be much longer

1
Starseed 1 point ago +1 / -0

but the list of those who still speak out against vaccines but aren't dead appears to be much longer

Yeah because NCSWIC. Despite their evil tactics truth prevails.

0
Im-Wide-Awake 0 points ago +1 / -1

Then how can one both claim that doctors are being killed off and also not being killed off? It's completely contradictory lol

1
horseyPatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

But “they” were after the doctors speaking out about the dangers of the vaccines during the Obama years, likely in preparation for what was about to happen. Covid was planned. They knew they’d have to silence the critics. So they killed off the ones that had already figured out what Big Pharma was up to. Obamacare forced many doctors into hospital practices where they had to sign away their freedoms. This was all planned!

-2
Im-Wide-Awake -2 points ago +1 / -3

And yet so far there is only one example of this taking place.

2
ThePowerOfPrayer 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's thousands of doctors who lost their independent practices partly due to the Affordable Care Act because they refused to join insurance company narrow networks and offer their services at a 15-20% discount.

When their patients were forced to replace their insurance plans due to Obamacare/ACA regulations, many discovered they could no longer see their doctors who refused to work for the narrow network discounted prices.

For many of those independent physician practices which survived the drop in patients, the Covid-19 plandemic was the nail in the coffin.

https://archive.ph/Xi829

0
Im-Wide-Awake 0 points ago +1 / -1

This is a completely different scenario than what was being spoken about earlier in this thread, so I’m not sure why you’ve responded to me with this information.

3
uk9994 3 points ago +3 / -0

Over 100 holistic doctors died

19
5Solas 19 points ago +19 / -0

So many things.

  1. SIDS
  2. Childhood asthma, diabetes, eczema, ADD/ADHD, autism, seizure disorders
  3. The jabs don't actually give immunity to anything
  4. The jabs have been used in this world countries (and probably here too) to sterilize women without knowledge or consent
  5. Polio
  6. Childhood cancer coincides with vac schedule
  7. Titers prove nothing
  8. HepB given to newborns supposed to last a lifetime, yet I know I took the full series as an adult (before I knew better) and less than 10 yrs later show zero titer, so according to them no immunity.
  9. One o the Indian medical missionaries we read about who helped to try to allay fears about shots tok one himself, which killed him, but he said he regretted it before his death. That as a medical doctor, they were a farce basically
  10. Tuskegee
  11. Cutter
  12. Stanley plotkins testimony about abortion babies for their vaccines then learning how the tissues had to be harvested live. 13I could go on, but watch "the truth about vaccines", and keep researching.
19
HardWorkinPatriot 19 points ago +19 / -0

A friend told me that her daughter's best friends baby died of SIDS. I told her it was caused by vaccines. Then she said " Oh my God! All the girl kept saying was..." He was so healthy when he went in for his shot yesterday!"

10
BettyBlue76 10 points ago +10 / -0

I’m pretty sure Florida reported both a Decrease in SIDS and a decrease in well baby (vaxx) appointments during covid. So sorry for your friend’s horrific loss.

4
uk9994 4 points ago +4 / -0

In UK too.infant deaths were way down

5
CirclebackGinger 5 points ago +5 / -0

When I was pregnant w/ our daughter, one of my husband’s high school friends lost their 2 month old to SIDS. It wasn’t until later, after having my own child, having my eyes opened to the “other side of vaccines”, and learning that SIDS wasn’t even a “thing” until around the 1980’s, that I put two and two together. I had the revelation that babies get up to 6 vaccines at 2 months and this was right around the time their daughter died in her sleep for no apparent reason. Unfortunately, I didn’t have my epiphany until my daughter had already received a majority of her shots, so I’m thankful that she survived despite my ignorance and she will never get another booster or shot until she’s 18 and can make her own decisions.

17
PaleMale 17 points ago +17 / -0

The FDA has even lower credibility than previously thought. The fact that an experimental and unavailable treatment was given full FDA approval in order to deceive people into taking another experimental product (Pfizer) is peak corruption and incompetence. There is no way forward that would ever allow me to trust the FDA again.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
4
Datadude 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's a mouth full of truth.

4
l3tsgetit 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is the craziest part. The npcs out there have heard countless stories about govt lying their asses off yet they turn around and give up liberties and stick their head in the sand consistently.

3
ThePowerOfPrayer 3 points ago +3 / -0

And we've got people here claiming to be wide awake yet skeptical of anything that goes against the mainstream narrative surrounding vaccines and healthcare.

You would think after 2 years of Covid, they'd be skeptical of the mainstream narrative, but no.

They're either shills or useful idiots.

4
tobeselfevident 4 points ago +4 / -0

I believe this was one of the main goals of Q. Our entire world had slipped into a stupor of assuming they were idiots who couldn't do their own research and became completely dependent on so-called experts to do our thinking for us and soon those experts started taking advantage of that. Even worse, most of them didn't even know. They just went to medical school or law school or whatever school and memorized the shit they were told so they could get their degrees and now it's a source of pride for them and they can't see past their own nose.

14
DontTreadOnPede 14 points ago +14 / -0

The thing that blew my mind the most was researching the history of the original cowpox/smallpox vaccine. Specifically how many people were adversely effected, and how the results were covered up. See this information:

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/23oi4e/the_skeptics_guide_to_vaccines_part_i_poxes_polio/

also:

https://davidpratt.info/humphries.htm

13
ATLAS_ONE 13 points ago +13 / -0

When I learned that lollipops weren't actually part of the procedure but just a way to shut children up after stabbing them with a needle.

2
Im-Wide-Awake 2 points ago +3 / -1

I didn’t think that was a secret. Getting a sucker/toy after the doctor/dentist was basically an incentive

12
Donutterrian 12 points ago +12 / -0

When I learned, back before COVID hit, that many, if not most vaccines, contain full DNA human genome from the MRC-5 cell line but with over 500 cancer genes inserted and/or modified.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-10-04-medical-horror-genetic-sequencing-vaccines-mrc-5-cancer-genes-modified.html

Edited to add: the above research was done in Italy, which might explain why they were initially targeted by the COVID propaganda.

2
uk9994 2 points ago +2 / -0

Watch Judy mikovitz. She said contaminated mouse blood ...viruses. Responsible for millions of cancers in USA and other countries. If people knew what went into vaxxines like mercury...second most deadliest element on the planet..now called thimerosol to fool you. It's not in jab for any other reason than to make the jab last longer..a preservative..and as they are not liable for deaths and injuries they don't care what it does to you.

There is never a virus in any vaccine ...no one has ever been able to isolate a virus to put them in a drug

1
Donaldsweiner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wonder if this is part of Q saying the truth would put 99% of people in the hospital !

11
COLNE68601 11 points ago +11 / -0

If you follow the CDC schedule, children get 6 doses of the DTaP shot by the time they enter 7th grade. The acellular Pertussis portion of this shot is junk. It is a non-sterilizing vaccine, which means it doesn't prevent the disease. Supposedly you can still get the disease but will have milder symptoms. Considering we give it to kids several times and they still get whooping cough anyway, it seems like there is very little benefit.

2
BettyBlue76 2 points ago +2 / -0

I need to learn more about this. My daughter has to get it for next yr. - 7th Grade.

6
Sunshines09 6 points ago +6 / -0

I recommend the vaccine book by Dr. Sears. He goes over every vaccine and what we know about adverse effects and likelihoods of catching diseases and their severity. It's non fear mongering, just straight knowledge so you can make your own decision that you're comfortable with.

1
BettyBlue76 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you.

1
uk9994 1 point ago +1 / -0

If he isn't saying that the witch's brew in a vaxx including aborted baby cells human urine monkey kidney cells eye cells of dog cats mice etc formaldehyde aluminium antifreeze

. Read it and weep. Add to that there can be can't be a virus in it and it's just to harm you and make money...don't listen to him

1
Sunshines09 1 point ago +1 / -0

He does include a very good discussion about the ingredients.

1
COLNE68601 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was trying to find you some specifics about DTaP/TDaP, but I keep getting sidetracked with work stuff. I suggest you check out The Highwire and Children's Health Defense.

Here's a document that has lots of facts regarding vaccines in general that was created by the Highwire/ICAN. I know there are some facts in there about DTaP.

https://www.icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/VaccineSafety-Version-1.0-October-2-2017-1.pdf

1
BettyBlue76 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you very much.

11
Fuhqreddit 11 points ago +11 / -0

My baby sister Erin died of SIDS at 3 months, I always wondered. See you in Heaven sis, love you.

10
TheTroof 10 points ago +10 / -0

When I learned half the world was stupid enough to take it, my mind was blown.

9
xchainlinkx 9 points ago +10 / -1

I hope someone can figure out a way to "factory reset" people to clear the toxic vaccines effectively.

4
Saxmaster 4 points ago +4 / -0

Reincarnation

9
Bonnieric 9 points ago +9 / -0

My double-vaxxed friend found wiggly, black worm-looking things in his blood while receiving a uv blood treatment at MD Anderson. The staff saw it and so did the woman sitting next to him. Is it parasites or graphene responding to the uv? I don't know. Imagine coping after seeing that in your own blood!

He takes a lot of Ivermectin, because he believes they are parasites. I told him to get glutathione shots, which helps dissolve graphene.

3
Litecola2 3 points ago +3 / -0

That is horrifying. It could be graphene oxide or something else, so taking both is a good idea. Getting a decent microscope can also help monitor the presence of those things on your own, if your friend is okay with getting droplets of his blood onto a slide.

N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC) boosts the body's glutathione production, it can be taken as a supplement and there are also many foods that contain good amounts of it. This is a good way to migrate from pills to healthy eating.

2
Bonnieric 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks. I copied and pasted your comment to send to him. He could afford a good microscope and good supplements and food. I bet he will listen to you.

2
DagnyDocket 2 points ago +2 / -0

I heard early on Dr. Tenpenny recommended baths that would draw stuff out. Similar/same as a treatment those with Morgellons use.

1
Bonnieric 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh yea. I forgot about that. Thanks.

2
Litecola2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Come back at us with updates when you can, we all learn together

WWG1WGA

2
Bonnieric 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks. I will.

1
ApplesOrangesLemons 1 point ago +1 / -0

hearing stuff like this makes me cringe and will give me nightmares. It's amazing hearing someone who personally knows someone with an incident like this

1
Bonnieric 1 point ago +1 / -0

Me too. I hear stories on podcasts, but to look into the eyes of an intelligent, successful man who is scared and angry is a whole other thing.

8
kish-kumen 8 points ago +8 / -0

What blew my mind was how quickly the definition of 'vaccination' and the concept of 'immunization' changed.

8
barndoorsmurf 8 points ago +10 / -2

To me this mystery of the mRNA so called bridging the brain blood boundary and them using EMF to somehow control humans like robots or zombies. The Donald never pointed out this tidbit while congratulating self on Warpspeed

6
trolltide 6 points ago +7 / -1

I actually worked on the blood brain barrier and am published on it in peer reviewed journals and you’re understanding it completely wrong. It’s false. The mrna part is scary because it changes your DNA, but nothing to do with EMP

5
sleepydude 5 points ago +5 / -0

You might be able to answer a question I've been pondering lately.

Considering it's fact that the mRNA "vaccines" can instruct cells to make spike proteins (you may have another opinion on that), then can it do the same to the cells that compose the blood-brain barrier?

You don't need to pass through the wall if you can turn the bricks into cannons, is what I'm suggesting.

4
trolltide 4 points ago +5 / -1

On phone excuse the typos. It’s whichever cells that intake the mrna. And yea that’s the endocascular cells and i would assume the BbB cells too. Which makes it extra tard because the spikes are different than regular covid spikes. They stick out on the cell. So it’s much more desctructive overall.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
BoatingAccident 2 points ago +3 / -1

Quick! Someone call Biden’s disinformation task force!

1
ThePowerOfPrayer 1 point ago +2 / -1

Funny you admit mRNA changes your DNA, because I came to that conclusion 6 months ago, long before it was finally admitted it does.

This was my post in reply to a comment that said-

mRNA can’t change your DNA, mRNA feeds into Ribosomes to make proteins.

u/#Wrong

SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome

Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 RNA shedding and recurrence of PCR-positive tests have been widely reported in patients after recovery, yet these patients most commonly are non-infectious. Here we investigated the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome and that transcription of the integrated sequences might account for PCR-positive tests. In support of this hypothesis, we found chimeric transcripts consisting of viral fused to cellular sequences in published data sets of SARS-CoV-2 infected cultured cells and primary cells of patients, consistent with the transcription of viral sequences integrated into the genome. To experimentally corroborate the possibility of viral retro-integration, we describe evidence that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse transcribed in human cells by reverse transcriptase (RT) from LINE-1 elements or by HIV-1 RT, and that these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed. Human endogenous LINE-1 expression was induced upon SARS-CoV-2 infection or by cytokine exposure in cultured cells, suggesting a molecular mechanism for SARS-CoV-2 retro-integration in patients. This novel feature of SARS-CoV-2 infection may explain why patients can continue to produce viral RNA after recovery and suggests a new aspect of RNA virus replication.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33330870/

u/#Fakenews

Reverse-transcribed SARS-CoV-2 RNA can integrate into the genome of cultured human cells and can be expressed in patient-derived tissues

Prolonged detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA and recurrence of PCR-positive tests have been widely reported in patients after recovery from COVID-19, but some of these patients do not appear to shed infectious virus. We investigated the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the DNA of human cells in culture and that transcription of the integrated sequences might account for some of the positive PCR tests seen in patients. In support of this hypothesis, we found that DNA copies of SARS-CoV-2 sequences can be integrated into the genome of infected human cells. We found target site duplications flanking the viral sequences and consensus LINE1 endonuclease recognition sequences at the integration sites, consistent with a LINE1 retrotransposon-mediated, target-primed reverse transcription and retroposition mechanism. We also found, in some patient-derived tissues, evidence suggesting that a large fraction of the viral sequences is transcribed from integrated DNA copies of viral sequences, generating viral-host chimeric transcripts. The integration and transcription of viral sequences may thus contribute to the detection of viral RNA by PCR in patients after infection and clinical recovery. Because we have detected only subgenomic sequences derived mainly from the 3' end of the viral genome integrated into the DNA of the host cell, infectious virus cannot be produced from the integrated subgenomic SARS-CoV-2 sequences.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33958444/

Another poster tried correcting me by stating, "This is the virus. Not the vax."

I replied as follows-

OP stated mRNA from the vaccines can't change your DNA.

2 separate studies suggested reverse-transcribed RNA can change DNA. Considering the mRNA vaccine works in exactly the same way, hijacking your cellular machinery to manufacture the spike proteins, it's only common sense it's possible they can also alter DNA.

OP's statement is a hypothesis and nothing more. As OP presented it as fact, I labeled it as fake news.

8
Hopiumaddict 8 points ago +8 / -0

I learned that I can be reported to child protective services for not vaccinating my child.

1
uk9994 1 point ago +1 / -0

Legally they don't have a leg to stand on if they sue you...it is not a vaxx it is an experimental gene therapy against federal and international law to experiment on humans without their written informed consent and a child cannot do that and as they don't know all the ingredients and there has been no testing they have no background to know if it is safe . It's an automatic death sentence...see Nuremberg codes.

Countries including usa signed up after the war and the experimental medical treatment the Nazis did to people was known.

you could say I need to see full let of ingredients safety checks etc. I know all the animals died every time they tried mRNA out on a nimals a nd then. They went straight to humans

Any social worker nurse pushing vaxx is guilty and death sentence. Show them that.

7
MisprisionIsEvil 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's not a vaccine. They call it that for marketing purposes. But it isn't.

4
trolltide 4 points ago +4 / -0

True. It’s gene therapy. Also because of ADE calling it a vaccine would mean CDC is admitting to mandatory harm. Lol.

7
NOTWOKE 7 points ago +7 / -0

That they changed the definition of vaccine, were caught doing this and still redefined it to incorporate unproven MRNA tech.. It was a obvious trick to fool the sheep. And the sheep lined up for the experiment.

-1
uk9994 -1 points ago +1 / -2

They are not sheep ffs!! They have been brainwashed since birth that vaxxs are good for you....the governments of the world were vaxxing..the TVs were in hysterics for people to get vaxxed.

Can't stand this superior attitude some people put on

2
ThePowerOfPrayer 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm guessing you may be from the UK based on your username.

In the US version of the English language, the terms brainwashed and sheep are interchangeable.

Here are 3 definitions of sheep from 2003-2004, and it's how Americans generally used the term long before Covid was a thing-


sheep

Someone who mindessly follows and emulates anything and everything in the name of fame/recognition. A waste of flesh and brain cells.

Many of the kids where I live are sheep.

by RatchetBoo April 26, 2003


sheep

1. A group of people who lack the capacity for careful consideration, imagination, or individual thought, who thusly go with group and allow god awful trends and events to unfold and make us all miserable.

2. In some cultures, a substitute or alternate for a woman in the act of sex

1. People who vote along party lines are sheep, and need to be given a good bitch slap to the face.

2. Iowa, where the men are men, and the sheep are scared.

by puma_blues March 29, 2004


sheep

A person who likes anything and everything that "everyone" likes (trends, etc.) for the sake of being cool. Once that trend ends and everyone stops liking it, they promptly start disliking it and it becomes the worst thing in the world. They also mock the people that continue to follow the "uncool" trends.

Billy: Wrestling's so gay, why do you watch that? I can't stand that crap.

Billy (3 years earlier): Stone Cold rules!

by Johnny J Shmoove July 26, 2003

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=sheep

1
NOTWOKE 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s not a vaccine.

0
uk9994 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hey called it a vaccine and they altered the definition of a vaxx when they were called out on it. NO one told the people liningup for jab..all th animals died during testing and it an experimental gene therapy which modifies your genes for ever and now we know alters DNA too did they?

2
NOTWOKE 2 points ago +2 / -0

No. They did not. They told as little as possible. However A little skepticism goes a long way to learning the truth. People trust the guvmnt is there to help them. They trust and line up for anything. Even admitted experimental shots

7
MaidInAmerica 7 points ago +7 / -0

It blew my mind how many WF vegan eating, hardcore yoga, meditating, and otherwise health conscious people couldn’t wait to get it, again and again - without exploring any data.

2
ThePowerOfPrayer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Same reason they want people destroying sea turtle eggs to get the death penalty, but will tell you an unborn baby is a clump of cells and abortion is a medical right.

These people are brainwashed by people who are sick.

1
MaidInAmerica 1 point ago +1 / -0

We started growing vegetables from seed, and the miracle is profound for me, a true gift from GOD. The sea turtles I have witnessed, another true miracle. The babies break my heart, up until birth in Colorado now. Some states 28 days after, by neglect. These people are sick,

1
l3tsgetit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Some of them look at the official data but don't dig any deeper. Half the problem is misinformation labeling anything unofficial quack or conspiracy

1
worldowedexplanation 1 point ago +1 / -0

They did it for Instagram likes and to fit in. Their lifestyles are mostly fake.

7
Firemothjoe 7 points ago +7 / -0

I was excited for the vaccine until I saw Tiffany Dover collapse on live TV. Then I believed everything Alex Jones said about the vaccine.

4
propertyofUniverse 4 points ago +5 / -1

She might have saved your life!

6
KimJung-Un 6 points ago +6 / -0

I learned that my friends are retarded.

6
PhDinNY 6 points ago +6 / -0

That they not only pushed children to get the covid shots when children had essentially zero risk, but that they continue to push covid shots for children, and now INFANTS!

1
l3tsgetit 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's evil and then there's cruelty. No reason the kids needed it. Liberal parents wanted this shit

2
uk9994 2 points ago +2 / -0

Unless they vaxx kids they don't get legal immunity

6
ThetruthSpreadsinNY 6 points ago +6 / -0

I saw videos and heard about other athletes collapsing out of nowhere. Then one of my coworkers was going to a NFL game and went blank and faceplanted into the concrete before he even got in. Broke his face and messed up his heart was out for 2 months. He wasn't drinking. Neither him or anyone else attributes it to the vaccine.

1
7Nick9 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dam !

6
Halya 6 points ago +6 / -0

That a concoction that was not properly tested is being forced on people even infants; that death and side effects data being fudged per the narrative at the time; that no one accepts responsibility for death and disability..... all show me this is an evil agenda.

On top of that, elites, CDC, FDA, WH and Congress staff are all exempt!

6
OneArmedViolinist 6 points ago +6 / -0

When the lockdown started, infant vaccination dropped dramatically as people stayed home from that first pediatrician visit. The infant mortality rate fell from 700 per week to 500 per week.

In 1986, before vaccine makers got legal immunity for any harm they caused, the autism rate was something like 1 in 50,000. Today, it is 1 in 39.

No vaccine is ever tested against saline placebo. The “placebo” injection is always a previously approved vaccine, with all its awesome toxic ingredients.

6
HippieNinja17 6 points ago +6 / -0

Die to covid and kids not being able to get their normally vaccines the death rate went down by almost 50% in kids due to unexplainable circumstances.

1
pearlrevolver 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you have a source for that? Very telling if true. I'll be sure to show everyone I know.

1
HippieNinja17 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didnt save it. I should have. It was a study done through vaers showing that the infant death rate has gone down. Sorry

6
Datadude 6 points ago +7 / -1

Your gut bacteria may be generating spike proteins and toxic by products, long after you receive the jab.

https://greatawakening.win/p/15HbuL6wh4/your-gut-bacteria-may-be-generat/

5
trolltide 5 points ago +5 / -0

Oh my God. Articles!!!!! You’re amazing, thank you. Entire thread was worth my time just for this alone. Thank you. Making a post about this too.

2
Datadude 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've taken so much from this buffet of information, I'm just happy to leave a little.

6
CavePeasant 6 points ago +6 / -0

Bottom line is they don’t make you healthy. They make you sick and injured. And at worse they can kill you. All of them can. I don’t trust any of them. At the moment, if vaccines just caused autism that would be one thing but we are learning that they do a LOT more than that.

3
l3tsgetit 3 points ago +3 / -0

A lifetime of raising a child with severe Autism and messing up the childs brain is on par with death.

5
horseyPatriot 5 points ago +5 / -0

I just watched the 17th episode of Fall of the Cabal. About vaccines. I’m never taking another shot!

5
Mr_A 5 points ago +5 / -0

When I realized they really do cause autism. And again, when I saw the correlation to type 1 diabetes by vaccine. And then even more by reading the collectively sourced information about it here over the past 2 years.

2
VaccinesCauseSIDS [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

And then even more by reading the collectively sourced information about it here over the past 2 years.

that... is the Great Awakening

the revolution does not happen "somewhere else"

the revolution happens inside you.

there are two steps necessary for any revolution.

  1. educate yourself

  2. educate others

5
Mpower88 5 points ago +5 / -0

Read the book “To Vaccinate or not the Vaccinate”. Author uses data from govt and pharma and concludes that vaccines (and their effects) are worse than the disease itself - in every case.

5
Patriotwoman9 5 points ago +5 / -0

That doctors/scientists have never been able to successfully create a vaccine for corona viruses. All of their animal tests died eventually.

5
damnsonq 5 points ago +5 / -0

this may be small be what blows my mind is that before my friends got the vaccine they would hear out any and all concerns but right after they got the vaccine even after all the warnings they wont hear anything out anymore. they just say the same repeated line about not wanting to hear it

4
yudsfpbc 4 points ago +4 / -0
  • Vaccines cause all sorts of diseases our ancestors barely knew about. I am suffering from some of these diseases.
  • By the time I got vaccinated, the people distributing vaccines knew of the harm.
  • Vaccines don't do anything to stop diseases. Not eating our poop and drinking our pee and washing our hands stops pretty much every disease out there. The vaccine dealers also knew this.

Vaccines are and have been a massive scam on the world.

4
MSRN281 4 points ago +4 / -0

I learned that lethal doses of Hydroxychloroquine were used to prove it more deadly than the vax to obtain the EUA. This NEVERRRRR should have been approved.

4
GuerroRanchero 4 points ago +4 / -0

I got the malaria vaccine before I went to India. Doctor said it was a dead 'husk' of malaria that was in the vaccine, so its not harmful but will cause the body to create antibodies. Knowing what I know today, I wouldnt have gotten it because who knows what ELSE is in it.

4
chase_now 4 points ago +4 / -0

There has not been studies for the combined affects of all vaccines. Each vaccine has a certain toxins such as mercury but there has no study to show that taking all the vaccines per the vaccine schedule is safe .

That is why a lot of alternative schedules were created in order to minimize the toxin load and let the body clean out before the next shots as well avoiding unnecessary shots such as flu.

4
Fikkan 4 points ago +4 / -0

That the Great Flu Pandemic at the end of WW1 may have started in US military camps and could be directly related to the massive push for "prophylactic" vaccinations administered in those camps on soldiers preparing to ship over to France.

0
uk9994 0 points ago +1 / -1

Rockefeller experimental vaccine ..a horse serum killed one third of the world.. military kept quiet as soldiers going to fight world war two were dying in the doctors office after jab... families told died for his country. Experiments at that time loved impossible to catch what they called Spanish flu and autopsies showed died of bacterial pneumonia from the jab.

4
Wendi 4 points ago +4 / -0

I wonder what other vaccines hurt us..like is vaccines to blame for autism and other disabilites and been denying that too.

1
Datadude 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good Question, The lies are long, and the deceptions are deep.

Dig wise warrior, the truth will free your mind.

Welcome friend

1
VaccinesCauseSIDS [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

yes. the list of problems that vaccines cause is very long, and includes autism. we aren't dealing with honest people here. we are dealing with people who rationalize that its OK to LIE to you, because YOU are too stupid to make good choices, YOU are too stupid to interpret the data, YOU might not vaccinate, if you knew the truth, so its OK to LIE to you, to get you vaccinated.

Oh, and if you ever happen to take a child in for a "well child" visit, and you specifically say NO VACCINES, the nurse will "accidentally" vaccinate your kid anyway, because obviously YOU are too stupid to do the right thing.

2
Wendi 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah I will admit to being stupid..stupid enough to trust my own country and government..that is what I was stupid about.that is what hurts most..I lost my faith in my own country. I pray I get that back one day before I die..

3
DuckButter 3 points ago +3 / -0

That a certain part of the population thinks that vaccines are essential to life, almost above anything else.

3
Lugnut307 3 points ago +3 / -0

My mind was blown as to that amount of people that never even raised a whisper, of a question, about getting the shot. Blew me away! Un.....believable!!!

3
brain_dead 3 points ago +4 / -1

Rabies vaccine built up toxins and kill pets.

2
trolltide 2 points ago +2 / -0

TBH i’d rather people not get rabies. Humans > animals. But that’s a personal value system lol. Seriously tho. Rabies look like bullets under the microscope but you have a much better chance of surviving a bullet than you have at surviving rabies.

2
INK10 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, Rabies is pretty gruesome, and nearly un-surviveable. I've seen some old videos of people in the last stages of Rabies, and it's pretty horrific. We vaccinate our pets against it routinely, but humans aren't vaccinated unless they've been bitten. Not even sure how I feel about that.

2
trolltide 2 points ago +2 / -0

Honestly if you’re in same room as a bat while sleeping, it’s indication for vax. I would. Rabies is horrid

1
INK10 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, I'd forgotten that. Sometimes people don't even know if they were bitten. Where I live, for some reason, we have a huge Raccoon population. Several people just in my neighborhood have been bitten, and they had to go through the Rabies shot protocol, including small children. But, better than the alternative.

2
trolltide 2 points ago +2 / -0

I forgot racoons are a huge thing too. Yea. Over here it’s bats lol

0
brain_dead 0 points ago +1 / -1

Lol.

3
freeDacian 3 points ago +3 / -0

I cant find the source anymore but: "Dr.Fauci was involved in creation of AIDS/SIDA and it is his brainchild, he has tried for years to perfect it,and finally embeded it in C19 and the Moderna responding vaccine"

3
Gatherer 3 points ago +4 / -1

That smoking cigarettes actually bars the receptors the vax attacks!

3
Donutterrian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Back in 2016, I read Vaccine A by Gary Matsumoto.

That's when I first learned that vaccine science had turned into complete quackery. I haven't taken a vaccine since.

Spoiler: in the book, he proved that the adjuvent in the anthrax vaccine caused Gulf War Syndrome.

2
MegaMAGAMichiPede 2 points ago +2 / -0

A friend of mine finally got her due from the Air Force for what the anthrax vaccine did to her. Rendered her infertile, she developed rheumatoid arthritis and chronic pain…just disgusting what happened to so many of our service members!

3
ApplesOrangesLemons 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wow... what you said really blew my mind. I remember worrying about SIDS but never thought it would be due to reaction to the vaccines. Also, these vaccines are mandated in California for the school system

0
uk9994 0 points ago +1 / -1

You need to start legal actions against the schools