2
Judicator 2 points ago +2 / -0

Both are evil. Both were socialist. Both killed millions brutally.

  • The gas chambers were known IN the war
  • They were on that side of the Iron Curtain in the war because they were built closest to their target demographics, which were most prominent in the territory that was coveted and originally split by both the Soviets and the Germans. The only reason it was on that side of the Iron Curtain is because the Allies cucked out of upholding their promises and chose appeasement of the Soviet Union over confrontation.
2
Judicator 2 points ago +2 / -0

Try going to Poland or Ukraine or even some places in Russia and saying that.

They'll tell you that you're a total fool for believing that only one side committed atrocities. They'll tell you that both mass-murdered in the millions and both put state before God.

Germany may not have torn down statues of it's own, but it certainly tore/burnt/blew down statues in the countries it invaded.

BOTH were socialist nations. BOTH were atrocious and despicable. To presume that only one is is absurdity.

1
Judicator 1 point ago +1 / -0

...After Germany kept aggressively expanding and declaring war on others...

3
Judicator 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not Russians, Slavs in general.

I don't think Ukrainians would appreciate being called Russians, for example, especially after how many of them were killed in particular.

9
Judicator 9 points ago +9 / -0

I think the civics lesson is kinda the point in a lot of ways, isn't it? That we can't surrender government out of laziness or not wanting to do the job again; majority of good people don't want to be politicians, but a lot of bad people DO. Even if we don't want to we have to do the jobs to prevent bad people from getting them.

No amount of regulation or checks and balances matter if we don't do any of the jobs or hold any of the branches, simple as that.

2
Judicator 2 points ago +2 / -0

Republican party went through a period of being quite pro-anarcho; in other words, pro big business, banks, etc. That drove a LOT of people away.

Most normal people were democrats until the party started radically transforming and forcing issues like abortion. That drove tons of people back to the Republican party, and ultimately we got Reagan as a result. I'm fairly convinced the country has been predominantly red since then, though of course Bush Sr. was cabal so it went from elected Reagan to the cabal doing the stuff they do with just practically flipping coins on elections as it would seem.

I don't know anyone that I'm aware of that's been a Republican from day one. Most were Democrats, and then flipped parties because of the dems and abortion.

5
Judicator 5 points ago +5 / -0

Exactly. The idea of considering it an entity or a thing to be controlled at all IS the problem.

Science is open for all; the best science is that in which the findings are reproducible by the most people possible.

1
Judicator 1 point ago +1 / -0

OP:

You're probably right about the first three points but the Earth is very much round. The evidence is overwhelming.

...to which you responded:

prove it. simply have nasa take a real photograph from orbit. oh wait...

1
Judicator 1 point ago +1 / -0

Some people suggesting responding with force, 2A, etc.

My question is this:

Why didn't that huge crowd just surround/insulate him? Force the police to make force against them all?

I think this brings up a real question/topic that every person should consider:

What would/will you do in situations like this, or others? While you're in a rational and time present state of mind, decide what the best action is. Go over this and others in your head until you are confident you will know what to do in any critical situation.

All it would have taken is one person in that crowd walking over and attempting to block their path, and calling the others around him. They could have made a circle around either him or the police; that is not violent; they would have had to use force (be the initiator of violence) to perform the arrest.

More likely, they'd have backed off and let him be, until later (like the Polish pastor in Canada). At least by then, they could have arranged for security or lawyers or both.

3
Judicator 3 points ago +3 / -0

Northern folk have to contend with shorter days in winter (and cold temperatures to boot!)

1
Judicator 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most of the "mah joos" people just can't fathom the idea that people of all kinds can be evil and also intelligent. They all MUST be joooos.

"but mah media companies and everything else" - lol really think a global cabal is going to make their identity obvious? They probably intentionally made it that way so that idiots like them would fall for the same age-old "blame the joos" bullshit; then they don't even need to get new scripts or writers, they can just feed them the old shit going back centuries and snicker because "it must be a centuries long conspiracy", as if it would take longer than the existence of most of the nations of the earth in their present governments/structures to take over the world when you already own the world. Give me a break lmao.

Oh, but right, only the nose people can be capable of intelligence and deceit. Europeans and others are all either too pure or too retarded to do anything.

Boggles the mind how these folks can function daily sometimes doesn't it?

I wager a lot of them are plants/bots, or victims of said plants/bots; probably sent here to discredit the cause just as they've done with most conspiracies for decades. It's one of the oldest tricks in the book.

4
Judicator 4 points ago +4 / -0

I've heard a lot of reports of Somalis in MN that hate her guts. I wouldn't be surprised if the majority do by a fair amount.

Voter fraud makes it hard for people to consider or realize that, to be fair.

15
Judicator 15 points ago +15 / -0

^ Or any nation armed with nukes.

How do you dismantle it GLOBALLY and be SURE you catch them all... just ONE slipping through the cracks could trigger the release of God knows countless weapons systems.

9
Judicator 9 points ago +9 / -0

^ Could be internal intimidation of the virus to which white hats were like "heh HCQ counters that well"

Could also be something to come still.

People 'ave talked about it possibly helping with negative effects of the vax?

3
Judicator 3 points ago +3 / -0

As someone who played a fair amount of that in my time, can I get a link? Can't seem to find anything about it.

2
Judicator 2 points ago +2 / -0

lmao

you got a heary kek out of me

3
Judicator 3 points ago +3 / -0

It always did feel off. Now I know!

It always felt like, harsh or unbalanced. Too much yellows, not enough blues. All of the colors were too harsh/forceful out of balance like that, kind of like the whole movement.

It makes sense they'd pervert the rainbow in both meaning and actual form though.

16
Judicator 16 points ago +16 / -0

Assume nothing is private, because to a determined force it is most certainly not private.

Why should this stop patriots from communicating? As of right now at least, talking isn't criminal; though I'm sure they're databasing this all and profiling everyone.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›