Many good drugs are FDA approved, many are not but should be. Many bad drugs have been FDA approved, some still are.
My health is my responsibility alone. My healthcare decisions are private and confidential, and are not the business of anyone else besides me and my doctors. I will take, or not take, whatever medical treatments, at my own discretion with the advice of my doctors.
When it is commonly understood exactly what the vaccines are, then Trump's "support" of the vaccines will also be understood.
Vaccines may be "good" - It's hard to comprehend that this could be true, and I personally don't believe it. However, in this case, Trump's support is simply right.
Vaccines may be placebo - In this case, Trump was supporting a harmless thing.
Vaccines may be "bad" - This is my belief/theory as of now. In this case, Trump's persistent, consistent support will lead to one thing - everyone blaming Trump for the vaccines. If you presume that Trump is on the good side, why would Trump want this?
Try to answer that question, as an "independent thinker".
Ike wore the Army Distinguished Service Medal with oak clusters, the Navy Distinguished Service Medal, and the Legion of Merit. He was buried wearing only these as well.
Although he earned several other decorations before and after D-Day, I believe these three were specifically earned on D-Day (if not also before), plus it would have been uncouth to not wear these three.
This country is in no more or less "crisis" than it has been since the election. The world is more and more in crisis, and this week the scat fan is aimed at Afghanistan courtesy of the Biden installation. That, and people all over are waking up to what's going on. Welcome to the storm.
MTG knows the rules, and so do I.
The first two problems above have been corroborated to varying extents. The last problem is, technically, speculation, but can be derived from the circumstances that must have existed to cause the first two problems.
It started as an experiment into some odd quantum mechanical phenomena.
If you do not have at least a a strong layman's grasp of QM, there are dozens of videos on the topic on YouTube and elsewhere that can help get you up to speed. You should already understand calculus and physics before diving into QM. I highly recommend the Feynman lectures to start. As Feynman says, which remains true today, (paraphrased) no one really understands QM.
The experimenters found that certain people could basically use the experimental apparatus as a sort of cosmic ouija board. This is where "gateway", another project, got tied in.
So, they honed the apparatus, the users got sort of tuned in, then they started asking questions and getting answers. Astoundingly, many of the answers were correct. At some point, they start asking forward-looking questions, whose answers would describe the future. They got increasingly better at this, deriving actionable intelligence that essentially enabled them to force future scenarios of their choosing, within certain limits.
The first "problem" they encountered, was that they tried to push the limits too far. This caused the quality/scope of good answers to shrink tremendously. That freaked out all involved.
The second "problem" they encountered, evident after the answer space shrank, was that all answers converged on a sort of singularity in or around the year 2012. They could find no path of action to avoid this singularity, and no cohesive answers were forthcoming beyond the singularity. To say the first problem caused a freak out is a profound understatement, but the reaction to this second problem was far and away worse.
The third "problem", which only a few people knew and which caused the project to be terminated, was the seeming explanation to the first two problems - their "looking glass" was not the only one.
This wouldn't be happening if Australians were armed.
It's hard to enjoy the show if you make yourself the show.
This is a great idea in general, but a terrible idea right now.
People are getting sick, but why? We have been told that flu deaths are practically zero, which is not possible.
How many "covid deaths" are really flu deaths? How many are medical incompetence? How many are something else?
If you lost someone to "covid", how receptive would you be to learn that their death was actually for some other cause? What if that other cause was preventable?
DNA is what you get when you reduce "chromosomes", which are the primary information carriers in our biology, to chemistry. Chromosomes, "genetics", and protein synthesis, do not reduce to chemistry, or we'd have figured out how to do it "non-biologically" by now.
It should be pointed out, that what we call "viruses" do exist. What we believe "viruses" to be, what we are taught they are, has not been scientifically demonstrated.
Back in the 90's and until the war, the Taliban were pretty messed up. It's possible the current Taliban are not quite the same.
I think it should be very dangerous to be a pedophile.
Pedo Tom has the sadz
I think the original Taliban were CIA, or may as well have been.
The current Taliban are acting much more disciplined and... seemingly peaceful, I dare say, sic CNN.
As I said in another thread, if the current Taliban don't go off killing thousands, and let Biden get his evacuation done, it will cause lots of hard questions where we once thought we had answers.
And do not inhale the stuff.
If the Taliban end up not butchering thousands of people, as is reasonably predicted, then lots of preconceived notions (including many of my own) must necessarily be discarded.
Awakening, for many, will be just like a psychotic break. The difference will be that instead of descending into lies and self-deception, people will be rising up in the truth. Be there for them, bring them comfort, assure them of the truth.
This is exactly, and entirely, what the symposium was about.
We all watched Mike Lindell put those numbers up on the screen, matter-of-factly. Lots of information like this was shared, but very little corroboration was offered.
None of us can honestly say that Mike's numbers are legit, or not. None of us need convincing that the "official" numbers are bullshit, or of their relation to the "true" numbers.
But Dominion, and the others of their ilk, they know. And when the real numbers are "discovered", the fact that we got them from this "Cyber Symposium" before hand, will be extremely damning for many in the "Cabal".
Actual science is something anyone with the pertinent equipment can do.
If one lab cherry-picks results, another lab could cherry-pick contradictory results. Neither of these is science. Science is anyone pointing out that neither lab has reported actual scientific results.
Q indicates that the US military are the "good guys", under the control of Patriots.
Q indicates that the United States federal government is currently under the control of a belligerent foreign occupation.
If both of these are true, then the US military is not currently under the control of the government. It would be presumed that the US military is currently fighting the US government and the belligerent foreign occupation. No such fighting is or has been apparent. Note that such fighting need not be at arms, in the traditional sense.
If this is in fact the situation (I believe it is), the sovereign state(s) behind the belligerent foreign occupation must be pacified/defeated before the occupation can be removed. According to some interpretations of Q drops, this happened before Trump left office, and possibly even before he was elected.
The Law of War manual sets out what belligerent occupiers can and cannot do. In order to effect mass psychosis of the population, the belligerent occupation must break several of these "laws".
I suspect that such unlawful acts are not forthcoming. This is the protection promised by Q.
Barring some surprise action on the part of the US military and/or the belligerent occupation, the next big opportunity for overt action will be the midterm elections. The US military was in full control during the 2016 federal election and every federal election since, including the GA Senate Runoff and a handful of Congressional races this year. They announced themselves in GA Senate special election runoff, via the "algorithm" applied, where no matter how many votes were cast for Warnock, the results were 51%/49% (for a while, the ratio was exactly 1 vote more than the 0.5% threshold for allowing a recount).
You got it. This show is only partly for us.
If you don't interact with modern websites in a 5D hex editor on a monochrome CRT, you are not a serious anything. /shitpost /s
I think this is one of the reasons why Zyrtec was removed from shelves. There was less "cancer-causing" chemical in one pill than in a bite of crispy-fried bacon.