What if the Old Testament as we know it today has been manipulated to misdirect modern day Christians and Jews?

That's an interesting thought, but the idea that the Old Testament has been manipulated to misdirect modern Christians and Jews is not widely supported by scholars. The Jewish rejection of Jesus as the Messiah is based on theological differences and interpretations of scripture, rather than deliberate manipulation of the text.

It's important to recognize that the Old Testament was established as a sacred text long before Jesus' birth. The Hebrew Bible was already well-established and widely respected within Jewish communities by the time of Jesus. The preservation of the Hebrew Bible has been a meticulous process among Jewish scribes and scholars, with strict measures in place to ensure accurate copying and transmission of the text.

While variations exist among ancient manuscripts, the core teachings and narratives of the Old Testament remain consistent across different versions and translations. So, while it's natural to question and explore the complexities of religious texts and interpretations, the idea of a deliberate manipulation to misdirect regarding Jesus requires substantial evidence and scholarly consensus, which is currently lacking.

Why go through the trouble of tattooing them if your simply going to throw them in a ditch?

Yes!

The Beast system is what gives rise to the Anti-Christ. The Beast system will be ushered in as something "good." And what is being heralded as "good" currently? Exposing and destroying the "evil" that has been controlling us for centuries/millenniums.

Almost. Combine those two and you have the Harlot System.

The Beast System is the (worldwide) Alliance against the Harlot (Jerusalem) ultimately destroying her (Revelation 18).

Part of the difficulty in seeing this deception is that the Harlot system is continually called the Beast system. This is inaccurate (on purpose). The Beast system will be seen as a "good" system because it will be destroying the "evil" system we are currently living under (Harlot).

Could it be that "the synagogue of Satan" is not a reference to a particular ethnic or religious group but rather to those who oppose the true followers of Christ, regardless of their background or heritage?

Yes, basically.

A scheme that reveals how the actions of all nations in the world are dominated at one and the same time by the operators of the religion of Judaism

In Revelation 17 we find a woman (Harlot) riding a Beast with multiple heads (Kings/Nations of the Earth). The apostle John clearly defines who the Harlot is:

Revelation 11:8: "And their dead bodies will lie in the street of the great city that symbolically is called Sodom and Egypt, where their Lord was crucified." This verse describes the "great city" as Jerusalem, where Jesus was crucified.

Revelation 17:18: "And the woman [Harlot] that you saw is the great city that has dominion over the kings of the earth." This verse is part of the description of the Harlot, and identifies the Harlot with Jerusalem as the "great city."

So, the Harlot = Jerusalem who rides/controls the beast, just as the above quote says. The Jews "dominate the nations."

This is Biblical Prophecy unraveling before our very eyes.

Now, what happens to the Harlot? Consider what John goes on to say in the same chapter (chapter 17, you say?):

The beast and the ten horns you saw will hate the prostitute [Harlot]. They will bring her to ruin and leave her naked; they will eat her flesh and burn her with fire. For God has put it into their hearts to accomplish his purpose by agreeing to hand over to the beast their royal authority, until God’s words are fulfilled. The woman you saw is the great city that rules over the kings of the earth.” (Revelation 17:16-18).

We are witnessing the "hating the prostitute" [Harlot] who is Jerusalem. This is "The Great Awakening."

Do not be deceived fellow believers (for there is a great deception in the works so as to deceive even the elect if that were possible, which Jesus spoke about in Matthew 24): The Jewish led, Zionist NWO that the world is "waking up to" is not the Beast System - it's the Harlot System. The Beast system is what destroys the Harlot System and ushers in the reign of the Anti-Christ.

Because God will again use gentile Nations to judge Israel (Psalms 2, Zechariah 14, Revelation 17:16)

Great question! Here are some key prophecies from the Bible concerning the re-establishment of Israel and the events associated with it:

1. Regathering of Israel:

   • Isaiah 11:11-12: The Lord will regather the dispersed of Israel from the four corners of the earth.
   • Ezekiel 36:24: The people of Israel will be gathered back to their own land.

2. Re-establishment of Israel as a Nation:

   • Ezekiel 37:21-22: The Lord will bring the Israelites back to the land of Israel and make them one nation.
   • Amos 9:14-15: The Lord will restore the fortunes of Israel and rebuild the cities.

3. Return of Jewish People to the Land:

   • Jeremiah 31:7-10: The Lord will gather the remnant of Israel from the ends of the earth.
   • Zechariah 8:7-8: The Lord will bring his people back to dwell in Jerusalem.

4. Rebuilding of the Temple:

   • Ezekiel 37:26-28: The Lord will establish a sanctuary in the midst of Israel forever.
   • Daniel 9:27: Prophecy of a future temple being desecrated by the Antichrist.

5. Conflict and Peace:

   • Ezekiel 38-39: Prophecy of Gog and Magog, a great future war against Israel followed by a time of peace.
   • Zechariah 12:2-3: Jerusalem will be a burdensome stone for all peoples, leading to conflict and ultimately the establishment of God's kingdom.

6. Conversion and Spiritual Renewal:

   • Zechariah 12:10: The people of Israel will look on Him whom they have pierced and mourn for Him.
   • Romans 11:25-27: All Israel will be saved, and the fullness of the Gentiles will come in.

And , notice how Jesus never referred to God as "Yaweh " the jew "God"

1. Matthew 4:7 (quoting Deuteronomy 6:16): Jesus said to him, “Again it is written, ‘You shall not put the Lord your God to the test.’” In the original Hebrew of Deuteronomy 6:16, "Lord" is the translation of "Yahweh."

2. Matthew 22:37-38: And he said to him, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the great and first commandment.” Here, "Lord" again translates "Yahweh" from the original text (Deuteronomy 6:5).

3. Matthew 27:46: And about the ninth hour Jesus cried out with a loud voice, saying, “Eli, Eli, lema sabachthani?” that is, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” In this passage, Jesus uses the Aramaic term "Eli," which is akin to the Hebrew "Eli," both meaning "my God."

And he point blank tells the Jews they worship Satan . Which means Yaweh is Satan. But no Christians grasp this . Even though it's right there in the Bible

Jesus' criticism was directed at certain religious leaders of his time, not at all Jews or the Jewish faith as a whole. He was challenging the hypocrisy and corruption he saw in the religious authorities, but his message was not an indictment of Judaism or its core beliefs.

Your comments seem to reflect a Gnostic-like view, particularly in the interpretation of Yahweh as a negative figure. Gnosticism often portrays the God of the Old Testament as a lesser or even malevolent deity, distinct from the true, higher God of the New Testament.

Your maths is rAyCis!

They should keep those tents. They're gonna need them after they graduate.

I want these fucking people cut out of our society, PERMANENTLY...like cutting a cancer out of the body.

Who, exactly, are you referring to here? Be specific…

Much truth in this statement

May need to consider that the "symptoms" we call "being sick" may simply be our bodies method of cyclical detoxing. And the signals our bodies use to communicate the detox processes with other cells within our body very well may be signaling the same process in other people who may be within our vicinity.

Plants communicate with each other. Women's cycles end up synchronizing with each other after a while. There may well be an entirely different mechanism at work with dis-ease, and we would never know it since we've been brainwashed with Germ Theory since birth.

Now you're asking the right questions.

Fox News = CNN w/ country music

AI very well could be a new and improved Ouija board.

Is theism required for agreement on these unalienable rights and the virtue it requires?

No, theism is not required for agreement on unalienable rights. These rights are fundamental principles that are recognized across different cultures and belief systems. The concept of U.R. is rooted in the idea that all human beings have inherent dignity and worth, regardless of their religious beliefs or lack thereof.

"What if what you call God, and another calls: 'Wralda', does that mean the latter is promoting atheism, or deism?"

This appears to be a semantic question that highlights the complexity of language and cultural differences. The terms "God" and "Wralda" may refer to different concepts or entities, but they both imply a belief in a higher power or transcendent reality. The distinction between theism, atheism, and deism is not solely dependent on the label used to describe the divine.

Do you see the trap set when accepting the Deep State buzz words. They are funding all sides of the argument, every single time.

This kind of hyper-skepticism leads to a self-referential and self-defeating circularity. The argument youre making (and almost the entirety of the Truther Movement/Great Awakening Movement) is that the "Deep State" is funding all sides of the argument, implying that any information or knowledge we have is potentially tainted by this alleged control.

However, this raises a crucial question: How do we know that this information about the "Deep State" isn't also part of the alleged control? In other words, if we assume that the "Deep State" is controlling the narrative and funding all sides of the argument, then how can we trust the information that leads us to believe in the existence of the "Deep State" in the first place? Isn't that information also potentially part of the controlled narrative/Matrix?

This creates a kind of epistemological paradox, where we're unable to trust any information, including the information that leads us to be skeptical of the information in the first place. It's a self-referential loop that ultimately leads to a kind of intellectual paralysis.

As I pointed out, this kind of thinking can be self-defeating, as it undermines our ability to make sense of the world around us. If we can't trust any information, then how can we make informed decisions or have meaningful discussions? In essence, this kind of hyper-skepticism can lead to a kind of nihilism, where we're left with no foundation for knowledge or truth.

I've been thinking about this very topic (the foundation of True knowledge in the Great Awakening movement) for a while now. And it' appears to me that if we're not careful, then we'll all end up in some form of Solipsism.

In the context of the Great Awakening movement, the emphasis on questioning everything and doubting the official narrative can be beneficial in encouraging critical thinking and promoting media literacy. However, if taken to an extreme, this skepticism can lead to a kind of solipsistic thinking, where individuals begin to doubt the existence of objective reality itself.

When we start to question everything, including the nature of reality, it can be challenging to find a solid foundation for knowledge. If we're not careful, we might end up in a situation where we're unable to trust anything, including our own senses, and that's when solipsism can become a tempting, albeit flawed, solution.

Solipsism, in this context, can manifest in various ways. For instance, some individuals might start to believe that they're the only ones who truly understand the "truth," while everyone else is deceived or asleep (something affecting almost all of us in this forum). This can lead to a kind of intellectual isolationism, where people become increasingly disconnected from others and the world around them (raises hand).

Another risk is that solipsism can foster a kind of paranoid thinking, where individuals begin to see conspiracies everywhere and doubt the intentions of others. This can create a toxic atmosphere, where people are more focused on uncovering hidden truths than on engaging in constructive dialogue and collaboration (another guilty charge).

I've waxed eloquent. Apologies. I guess I still suffer from a little PTSD from my discussion with @slyver (another pede in here) about this very topic.

I digress.....

Darwin's mistake was to assume that observable adaptation to the environment necessarily meant the possibility of massive changes to the organism to such an extent that it would become something entirely new. There is nothing in the fossil record to support that idea.

Nailed it.

Darwin did nothing to push for atheism

I respectfully disagree with your assertion here that Darwin's theory of evolution does not advocate for atheism. While Darwin himself did not explicitly argue for atheism, his theory of evolution by natural selection did propose a mechanism for the diversity of life on Earth that did not necessitate a divine creator. This has been viewed by many as a challenge to traditional religious beliefs and has played a role in the growth of atheism and agnosticism.

they look painted grey

While I'm not doubting the fakery involved with this incident, the answer given as to why he looks grey is because they dowsed him with a fire extinguisher

We're the Terrorists - but we're mostly peaceful and it's for Democracy.

I've come to the conclusion that all "one hit wonders" wouldn't drink the blood.