7
LessSwampMoreMAGA 7 points ago +7 / -0

“Vaccine failure”

Kindly remind those that get covid after their injection subscription that you are sorry they are a “Vaccine failure”

4
LessSwampMoreMAGA 4 points ago +4 / -0

My understanding is they added it to the CDCs Vaccines for Children program, they were saying something about insurance payments that i don’t quite believe.

The vote to add it to the children’s vaccine schedule is today (october 20).

Please correct me if I’m wrong.

2
LessSwampMoreMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

since its merger its down from about 12.

There was some shennanigans on the first day where it jumped 20-30% for no reason, then the day after dropped like 15% and all you saw were headlines of "RUM stock tumbles 15%!"

Rumble is getting attacked hard, headlines when it goes down, silence when it goes up.

2
LessSwampMoreMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not on the cross but in the storm...

Matthew 8:24-26 "And behold, there arose a great storm on the sea, so that the boat was being swamped by the waves; but he was asleep. And they went and woke him, saying, "Save us, Lord; we are perishing." And he said to them, "Why are you afraid, O you of little faith?" Then he rose and rebuked the winds and the sea, and there was a great calm."

1
LessSwampMoreMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

I ended up deleting my comment because 1) I didn't think it was adding anything and 2) I was already mentally poking holes in my argument but to your point. Weed killer in your example is doing what it's intended to do. Glyphosate isn't being sold as a decongestant or a nutritional supplement. Normal people cant observe vaccines working, but you can observe them NOT working. Theres alot of pharmaceuticals that you cant really observe working but are shown to work to a "Statstical significance" in studies with large populations (aka a weak signal).

With that said, there are lots of pharmaceuticals whose intended treatment changes based on the side effects noticed in initial rounds of testing.. In other words they design it for one purpose doesn't actually work but has a side effect, then they brainstorm to how they can use that side effect to their benefit.

I think the basis of this post was that you have to have a HUGE amount of trust in the Pharmaceutical companies/FDA/Doctors that these products work as they say they will and covid has absolutely shattered that trust.

Edit: For all those curious, my previous comment was that my first check is actually observing if a product is working or not rather that relying on statistical probability of an improvement.

1
LessSwampMoreMAGA 1 point ago +2 / -1

Jailing every doctor and nurse serves no good purpose, we don't have the facilities to try or jail that many, and will never happen. You are already seeing now many are changing their tune on the vaccine (that they themselves were misled) and I'm sure many are, and will be, seeking forgiveness.

2
LessSwampMoreMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

We need a (R) state supreme court first. The current (D) majority already ruled they don't recognize the legislature due to "gerrymandering" on our voter ID constitutional ammendment. I have no doubts a (D) state supreme court would overrule any change to weaken vaccine requirements.

4
LessSwampMoreMAGA 4 points ago +4 / -0

I got a follow up to a data deletion request that included caveats. They even say they only delete some of your data.

Because PayPal is a financial company, we’re required by law to keep your personal and transaction data for a number of years after your account has been closed or inactive to prevent fraud and money-laundering and to comply with financial laws. The amount of time we need to keep the data is determined by federal, state, and local laws. We were able to delete some of your data, including:

2
LessSwampMoreMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Faraday Bags! Single point locations are far less useful than live tracking.

2
LessSwampMoreMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Anyone have thoughts on these? Thought about getting one or two to see how they are since the children’s book market is flooded with leftist junk.

2
LessSwampMoreMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is where Im at. I recently found a Church that had some messages that really resonated with me and talked with a pastor there about the Lord and getting more involved. Theres so much deception lately I want to focus locally and help those that want and need it.

3
LessSwampMoreMAGA 3 points ago +4 / -1

I realize there is an information warfare going on. I realize if we have purity tests you will 1) never be able to sway others to your side and 2) never be able to 'infiltrate' the other position like the deep state does (think RINOs). You have to be willing to work with others to achieve your specific goal even if you disagree with your other positions, it's how Trump was able to accomplish so much.

With that said I'm not voting for her for anything but if she endorses MAGA candidates over Dems? I dont see why not. We shouldn't have any derangement syndrome. There are alot of non rabid leftists that listen to her and think shes a voice of reason that aren't quite yet ready to vote out the swamp.

But watch out for that gun grabbing position of hers or a 3rd party run.

4
LessSwampMoreMAGA 4 points ago +4 / -0

Also if anyone is looking more into this topic, in pharmaceuticals adjuvants are more commonly referred to as excipients, it would be useful searching both terms.

And there is a huuuge gap in assessing excipient safety as they are almost always included in the placebo and glossed over in many cases. There has been cases were post market side effects previously attributed to drugs (example being cancer drugs) were in fact the excipients.

3
LessSwampMoreMAGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Funny that youtube banned instrumental song(s) that showed a picture of a sky with nothing offensive in the title for “violations against community standards”.

Edit: context, youtube banned the richard feelgood album

4
LessSwampMoreMAGA 4 points ago +4 / -0

Has there been any commentary on the sheer glut of laws our nation has and how to resolve the ever expanding definition of criminality? Laws only seem to be added and never removed, so at some point literally everything is going to be illegal.

You’re seeing it now with the politicization of the DOJ where they selectively prosecute. While technically many of these “crimes” are committed, only one side gets prosecuted. And you then get the worst argument in the history of leftists of “whataboutism”

Id like to see some politicians rune on recinding and cleaning up the law books, but that is a monumental task.

5
LessSwampMoreMAGA 5 points ago +5 / -0

We need a challenge to “terms of service” agreements in court. They are now acting like contracts written by only one side.

5
LessSwampMoreMAGA 5 points ago +5 / -0

Where is that money going to go though? Im genuinely curious cause personally id like to avoid the vanguard/blackrock mafia where possible.

1
LessSwampMoreMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

It makes me wonder how many historical figures were just the frontmen for those behind the scenes.

7
LessSwampMoreMAGA 7 points ago +7 / -0

Let’s see the analysis separated out by economic status. Last i heard almost all the benefit from the analysis is in people with bad dental care. But why does fluoride reduce cavities? Its not a nutrient and its known to be extremely hazardous. If its topical then why is it being added into water? Ingestion is not topical.

Covid has really pushed me to question everything that has become so standard that there is no alternative and its heresy to question otherwise.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›