They're going to force 'medications,' they make their poisons in the cheapest places and ways possible for profit maximization, plus they're going to get government contracts anyway. The only effectivity they're looking for is getting people on the chronic illness and death pathways, and getting mRNA into them to turn them into little spike protein factories that shed was the plan.
That's a lot of effort into sarcasm to say one thing simply, sorry you feel so emotional on the topic. Here's something I am emotional about: murder.
For my part, as a biochemist I realize that the technology they're discussing is directly related to the housing of recombinant pieces of RNA AND DNA to stably enter the cells. As having awakened in the last decade and researched many late nights into Big Vaccines, I've come to the conclusion that none of the vaccines were ever functional nor safe, based on the lack of honest studies showing 'safe and effective' and the preponderance of studies that show disproportionate harm. Also, the documented fraud, lies, convictions and penalties paid by Big Vaccine shows they have no regard for life, and we cannot believe literally anything they say. In fact, I'd propose that we start with the opposite of what they say. Based on their own documentation.
So, we don't know anything about what's really in the vials. We don't know if ANY quality control has EVER been done. We believe they're manufactured by the lowest bidders, in places that don't like us. I don't care how many aerosolized 'vaccines' are released, there are many reasons to believe they will be harmful in many ways. MRNA is the latest tend, and execs like the latest trend (see failed spending on AI).
The science presented here is well-documented and real, presented in a way that can be followed by normal folk. Keep this article bookmarked for any doctors who are ready to question the baby food journal article summaries they've been accepting for years, which have lied to them.
Academic talking way too long and uninterestingly about important topic. Race realism is a vital idea but this isn't the way to do it. Hoping that Tucker Carlson can interview her in a shorter form and guide her to being interesting to listen to.
So, not mentioning airborne suspicions lets it stay up, but conjecture about aerosols or chemicals spread by airplanes gets a takedown. Yeah, people in the area that can test need to do so quickly. And if I lived there, I'd be taking a vacation around now.
Before, after, surface deposits and deeper samples... Penetration rates, seepage, whatever you call the rate at which stuff descends down through the soil. Yes, a spot number doesn't give you the full picture. I do get the feeling that the only soil studies permitted or funded, however, will be from the mining companies.
Basic logic fail, I made a syllogism to your comment. Your logic failure, I propose, is the true source of downvotes, but you're consistent at least, and attribute disagreement to a phantom group, strawmen that you will bravely hold the line against, or something. Could make a great bar story.
Meanwhile, I'll continue learning from what I read instead of insulting what I don't understand. God bless you and I pray that the gifts of the Holy Spirit come upon you, and that you don't reject them mistakenly when they do.
I would propose toxic feminism is one of the worst, but it is a product of evil. Satanic communist globalist whatever, division and hate are the currency of evil, so communism is a main tool and communists are experts at fomenting more division and hate. Globalists use all the tools to divide and conquer, to consolidate power. The devils are behind all of it and I don't think they care which faction "wins" because they want corruption of creation. So, socialists, blm, Marxists, atheists, feminists etc are just facets of evil. We can combat the pawns but we need to strike at the heads.
Remember the RFK clip about how this works? The alphabet agencies start problems, color revolution, war, funding/loans with ridiculous terms, disaster, default, US repos, US companies clean up by getting labs at government back door sales, reconstruction projects at government back door bids, etc. This is seizing a whole country for plunder, I think.
Different groups are going for the big money contracts and have different ideas on how to do it. 'Vaccine hesitancy' goes beyond needles now. A significant account of those that submitted are becoming infertile and/or dying of horrific cancers, etc. The next targets won't be nearly as compliant; they already resisted a huge coordinated campaign of fear and force. That's why we're seeing different research groups claiming they can put it in food, in air, etc- competition. Any one of these may work or not, any might be 'most effective,' depending on the payload and intent. If the intent is to contaminate everyone possible in a region, perhaps with certain genetic exceptions, then maybe staying public spaces are enough. The haze-making sky sprays maybe can't be as targeted.