3
Malachi3vs16 3 points ago +3 / -0

not sure why someone gave you a -1, but I’ll add a +1 because it’s true that prices have dropped in the past, and true that homes have more features, a lot more wiring (“long wire” 10 years ago for putting cable in every room), wifi, extra garages, swimming pools, tennis courts, insulation (China drywall for Florida, that’s a negative though).

5
Malachi3vs16 5 points ago +5 / -0

Silver: $420,800 / $26 per silver ounce (just an average for 2024) =16,184 silver coins to buy an average house, compared to only 6,500 silver coins in 1925. Silver could increase in comparison to house prices, or housing could drop in value, deflation, compared to silver. Silver could go to $64.73 per coin to be at the equivalent purchasing power in relation to a home price in 1925, where 6,500 silver hopefully in the future x $64.73 = approx. $420,800.____Other thoughts are that everything is so inflated and silver could become in short supply for industry that silver could go to $600 per ounce and even $1,200 to &1,600 per ounce. ____ (34 minute laid back interview with David Morgan of the Morgan Report: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ajr4E5Q-UYA ____ be careful with the volume though, caution: volume goes from loud to soft between the host on the left (Loud) to quiet (guest David Morgan on the right)

10
Malachi3vs16 10 points ago +10 / -0

Gold and silver will be the Dollar again, as in pre-1933. Average price of a home in 1925: $6,500. $20 gold piece = $20. $6,500 / $20 = 325 gold coins (approx. .9675 oz. gold per coin). ___ 1 silver back then (Morgan silver dollar = .7734 oz. silver per coin). 6,500 silver coins for average home. ____ Down payment: 25 gold coins or 500 silver coins.____ Average earnings for a family about $3,000. ____ Median home price today = $420, 800 / 325 gold 1 ounce coins = $1,294 equivalent gold price, yet gold is at $2,300 today. ____ So a house at $420,800 /$2,300 per gold coin = only 182.9 gold coins! So gold has increased its value compared to an average value per house from 1924/25 to 2024. ___ I might have miscalculated, something does not seem right! Or do we expect deflation, housing values to drop 40%?

2
Malachi3vs16 2 points ago +2 / -0

thanks, definitely spacing was needed! Thanks to mod also for highlighting in green a key point

3
Malachi3vs16 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is the hardest hitting true meme, a baseball hit, knocked out of a ballpark home run.

3
Malachi3vs16 3 points ago +3 / -0

Tracy Beanz thread too pessimistic, but good you brought it to attention. The government, she pointed out, will say in the future that “EVERY vaccine is effective at preventing spread to get around this”. ____ But the government cannot just merely say that and have courts uphold fake vaxxes based upon an unproven claim. Is this site GreatAwakening.win? Dark to Light. Exposing the shadow government of the deep state. T Beanz did not conclude her post correctly. To quote from the “Cheers” show theme, “WE WIN!” (at 50 seconds marker https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KtAgAMzaeg). I think T. Beanz knows this, maybe her post just was meant to get people to think more deep,y about this case and not get lazy.

4
Malachi3vs16 4 points ago +4 / -0

This likely needs to get to Military Tribunals level. Military personnel give up a lot of personal rights and liberty interests. However, we know that these are death shots, poison, and the shots vary from placebo to full strength poison, and the shots vary in ingredients by batch and lot numbers. This is 5th generation warfare.

6
Malachi3vs16 6 points ago +6 / -0

Sorry, that was long, (needed a break after condensing 25 pages of the majority and concurring opinions down a lot.)____ Note: the majority did not rule that as a matter of law that the Pfizer, Moderna, and other “coronavirus shots” are therapeutic medicine and not vaccines. The majority noted that the plaintiff argued this + defendant did not demonstrate otherwise (“safe and effective” argument did not show that “the shots” were traditional vaccines that would justify applying Jacobson case standard of mandating vaccines. ____ If defendant at trial had shown that “the shots” protected the public from the spread of disease, then the 9th would likely have upheld the decision of the District Court in favor of the defendants). ____It seems that the defendants really did not present their side well. ____ Because of this, the District Court has to hear the Plaintiff’s case and decide while keeping in mind that for purposes of this case that Jacobson does not apply, “the shots” are therapeutic” and not traditional vaccines that prevent the spread of disease.

11
Malachi3vs16 11 points ago +11 / -0

The main holding of the 3-judge panel is 2 parts: 1) that the plaintiff’s case is not moot (reversing the trial court’s dismissal based on defendant LA unified school argument at trial: that because LAUSD no longer requires the vaccine, the case is moot, the plaintiff no longer faces being forced to get vaxxed, so he has no case.). So the 9th reversed the trial court’s decision and the trial court now has to hear the case and decide based upon the plaintiff’s argument. ____a) He was discriminated against. _b) He alleged that the mRNA shots are not vaccines but therapeutic medicines, the 9th Circuit stated that the trial will move forward with this fact. Defendant LAUSD had a pattern of mandating, then stopping mandating, then mandating again the shots. The majority opinion noted that because defendant LAUSD had this pattern, defendant showed that the plaintiff likely would face employment discrimination in the future by likelihood of LAUSD bringing back the mandated shots. So plaintiff gets to have his case heard, that he wrongfully suffered from not having his fundamental right respected (you can’t be forced to receive medicine) and plaintiff argues he deserves compensation for being unjustly treated. ____2) (the good part) main holding, the “merits” of the case: the federal district court judge ERRED by using the Jacobson Supreme Court case. The trial judge used an old case about smallpox vaccines. Under Jacobson, the government has a rational basis to force vaccines that prevent the spread of disease. In the present case, the 9th finds Jacobson does not apply. ____a) Plaintiff argued at trial that “the shots” do not prevent the spread of disease. ____+ b) Defendant LAUSD argued “safe and effective” = a failed argument to apply Jacobson standard that the government can mandate vaccines. 9th held that because the defendant did not show that “the shots” were made to and could prevent disease therefore the District Court was wrong in using Jacobson. ____Plaintiff’s argument back in trial at the District Court will be: over his liberty interest, based upon his “fundamental right” to not be forced to take a therapeutic medicine just to keep his job.

1
Malachi3vs16 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for the link! Here is the plaintiff’s attorneys law firm — under “news” they share other similar cases, and as the case in this thread hoes back to trial court, it will be interesting to see the outcome. https://jwhowardattorneys.com/

2
Malachi3vs16 2 points ago +2 / -0

The plaintiff was fortunate, he got 2 Trump appointed judges on the 9th Circuit to hear the case. Judges Nelson and Collins = Trump appointees. (Obvious, but I will state it: the Clinton appointee dissented, Judge Hawkins). ____ page 25 in Judge Collins concurring opinion brought up ”the fundamental right to refuse medical treatment”.____ The main decision is that the plaintiff”s case ”is not moot” (p. 20). So the plaintidff gets to move forward on the basis that his fundamental right was violated

1
Malachi3vs16 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump told us in a round about way, Jan. 20, 2025. https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/112561638180459469 ____ Qagg.news for those who cannot go to Truth Social direct: posted 6/05/2024 at 22:24:53 https://qagg.news/

1
Malachi3vs16 1 point ago +1 / -0

1.7 million, next year, my estimation based upon a Kitco interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVSGItyOnJ0 ____. summary: financial reset coming, layoffs coming; one reason to watch 24 minutes is he provides interesting charts about how the stock markets crash and how laypffs might occur and how gold could play out over the coming year

1
Malachi3vs16 1 point ago +1 / -0

wish 2.17 million socialists had caught the drift and gone to the moon; safe landing wishes only for the awakened

2
Malachi3vs16 2 points ago +2 / -0

actually, interesting format error, article is there, when posting a link there needs to be a space rather than immediately using ____ as thought separators in a post; format lesson learned, Ignore: they removed this within 30 minutes of being posted here. Still know that they they are enemies of America!

1
Malachi3vs16 1 point ago +1 / -0

old but I don’t see that this was posted 17: The Hill and utuber with 2.17million “followers” assert hydroxychloroquine and Trump were responsible for between 3,000 and 30,000 excess worldwide deaths in 2020, https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4389800-hydroxychloroquine-deaths-study ____ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTN-FigcmmU ____ In the comments, the sheople show still haven’t figured out that chlorine dixode is notbleach

2
Malachi3vs16 2 points ago +2 / -0

Amazing history, thanks for sharing more of his story and about his pilot son.

3
Malachi3vs16 3 points ago +3 / -0

He opposed both forms of socialism: Communism and Fascism, and he asked to be part of the D-Day landings. Wounded during the previous World War 1, he wanted to be part of the fight. June 6, his group of landing craft were moved off course by the English Channel waves. Once ashore, he rallied troops in his group to fight while walking the beach with a cane. A month later, his heart gave, and he rests in peace at the Normandy American Cemetery, France. https://www.cmohs.org/news-events/medal-of-honor-recipient-profile/theodore-roosevelt-jr/

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›