1
Mar-0 1 point ago +1 / -0

If that guy was under cover with the CIA for 23 years then he should have been able to figure out that they've ALWAYS been above the law. He loved it tho, eh? This is BS.

12
Mar-0 12 points ago +12 / -0

My wife had severe depression to the point of hearing voices telling her to do things. Doctor was like "Durrr idk what to do, try this drug". The drug half-worked with bad side effects. Then I heard about CBD (oil from weed). All of her problems went away with it.

Now you tell me why they're trying to ban weed.

2
Mar-0 2 points ago +2 / -0

And this is why my Walfart had empty milk shelves for a week.

3
Mar-0 3 points ago +3 / -0

And just who exactly are you, Ukraine, to be giving yourself the responsibility of democracy worldwide?

1
Mar-0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pretty sure you got it backwards. Would be kinda difficult to push us if we didn't trust them. We should all make like the 1st Amendment audit community and start watching and recording everything these institutions do.

4
Mar-0 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
Mar-0 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's exactly what I'm talking about. All of a sudden it's like it never happened. I don't like whatever is going on here.

1
Mar-0 1 point ago +1 / -0

My how the narrative shifts, even on GA. There were so many talking about it that took a break from the site.

by MAGULQ
2
Mar-0 2 points ago +2 / -0

Remember there is already redundancy for airline pilots, they're called co-pilots. However even that didn't stop the airlines from grounding a bunch of pilots shortly after forcing said pilots to take the poison injection.

3
Mar-0 3 points ago +3 / -0

Here's a good reference for you:

The Money Masters by Bill Still https://odysee.com/@KnowledgeBase:e/Bill-Still-The-Money-Masters-Full-Documentary-1996:7

On another note, everything else you described is the difference between a sovereign and a citizen, something I explain in this comment.

6
Mar-0 6 points ago +6 / -0

Except they never had good intentions at all. The entire pharmaceutical industry was created by the Rockefeller Foundation for 2 main purposes: money (power, control) and to stamp out natural medicine.

1
Mar-0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Embrace. Microsux notices there is a software tool that is becoming very popular with people. The problem they have with it of course is it's not owned by them and it's also not part of their vision of how they want people to use computers. So they will (perhaps after failing to discredit the reputation of the tool) Embrace the tool, tell everyone they love it, love working with it, etc. Then they will...

Extend. Add features/plugins/whatever to extend the functionality of the tool a bit more in the direction of their vision. All proprietary extensions of course. Possibly they have bought ownership rights to the tool by now as well. They work to ensure people now rely on the modifications they made, then they...

Extinguish. They snap their fingers and snuff it out. They owned it so people who use it have no choice but to accept they can't use it any more. Then they tell everyone "Hey look, you should do your work this way instead with our other tool."

They're doing this with Linux right now. They used to say "Linux is a cancer" because it is not proprietary, it is free. Free to be modified, shared, used. Then they embraced it, then they extended it by creating the Windows Subsystem for Linux. This integrates a Linux environment directly into Windows so that developers who are used to using Linux can now use Linux inside the Windows OS. See where this is going?

This is why proprietary software is a bad thing. Look up what a copyleft license is.

One more thing: there is a difference between Free software and Open Source software. Open Source allows you to see the source code (before it is compiled into non-human-readable machine code which is what actually runs on the computer) so it can be inspected for bugs, malicious instructions/intent, etc, but it is NOT guaranteed to be free to modify, share, use, etc. Free software includes being open source because you cannot modify it without the source.

This is why the Open Source movement is another "false flag" as I call them because it confuses people away from the freedom that is necessary for people around the world to work together on making software better for everyone.

3
Mar-0 3 points ago +3 / -0

The term Sovereign Citizen is an oxymoron. A sovereign is simply an entity capable of making its own decisions. As in not requiring another to think for it. A citizen is an entity that is completely subject to another entity's rules with no say in the matter.

The United States was meant from the beginning to be a nation of sovereigns as the government was meant to operate with the consent of the governed. The Sovereign Citizen movement was deliberately created to confuse this issue and make people forget what consent of the governed really means.

2
Mar-0 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well I can help you with this one a bit: viroliegy.com

I can also talk a little bit about the false flag Sovereign Citizen movement.

I can explain why converting to electric vehicles is much worse for the environment.

And finally I can explain Microsoft's (or pretty much all of big tech now)'s now hidden motto "Embrace, Extend, Extinguish".

3
Mar-0 3 points ago +3 / -0

Anyone else remember that time the news mentioned some politcians were getting facelifts?

1
Mar-0 1 point ago +2 / -1

And still nobody can explain "virus isolation" to me. Nobody can explain why I haven't gotten sick ever since I stopped taking flu shots either.

1
Mar-0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gets more obvious by the day.

6
Mar-0 6 points ago +6 / -0

I can't believe any of this until they come up with a test that isn't a twist of logic.

4
Mar-0 4 points ago +4 / -0

Considering Pelosi said stuff like "We have to pass the bill so you can see what is in it" without people batting an eye, not surprising at least.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›