So given that Israel takes hostages also, where does that leave us morally?
And how much trust should we put into the narrative of a people who believe it's morally upright to lie to us to take advantage of us? How implausible is it that Oct 7 was just some high production Sandy Hook?
The name "Boaz" appears on the left pillar in the High Priestess card and originates from one of the two bronze pillars that stood at the entrance of Solomon's Temple in Jerusalem. In the context of the temple, Boaz means "in him is strength," symbolizing stability, power, and support.
In the tarot, this pillar, along with Jachin, represents the duality and balance inherent in the card's imagery. The High Priestess card uses these pillars to illustrate the balance between different forces—such as masculine and feminine, light and dark, conscious and unconscious. Boaz, specifically, reinforces the themes of inner strength and the grounded, stable aspects of wisdom and intuition that the High Priestess embodies.
Also check out this earlier photo where they all have their ties on:
https://www.cnn.com/2017/09/07/politics/george-hw-bush-former-presidents-harvey/index.html
A person familiar with the former presidents’ appeal said that although the White House was notified ahead of the public announcement, the effort was always intended to be only the ex-presidents without participation from the current commander in chief.
The rollouts of those efforts, however, did include the sitting president. Obama brought George W. Bush and Clinton to the White House Rose Garden to announce the Haiti relief effort, and Bush brought his father and Clinton to the Roosevelt Room to announce the tsunami appeal. The Katrina efforts emerged from the tsunami coordination.
So you have an established history here of disaster followed by Presidentially involved fundraising...
I’m proud to stand with Presidents for #OneAmericaAppeal.”
Emphasis on stand vs sit?
The “Presidents Club” has existed in an uneasy state since Trump was elected. The normal comity between past holders of the job and the current occupant has been disrupted by Trump’s frequent criticism of Obama, his continued attacks on the Clintons and his general disregard for the usual displays of decorum offered in the job. He’s not believed to have spoken to any ex-presidents since taking office in January.
You can also look at Trump's donations and it's a bit patterned:
https://www.cnn.com/2017/09/06/politics/trump-harvey-donation/index.html
And I'll say the CNN article has this:
After Hurricane Harvey struck Texas in September, all five started the charity effort and filmed a video urging citizens to help out amid the devastating flooding.
They have since resumed the effort in the aftermath of Hurricanes Irma and Maria.
Which I read as "After 88 struck Texas in September...they have since resumed the effort in the aftermath of HIM."
Fren I thought this post was a bit lazy at first but it's got my gears spinning now..
The photo is from a hurricane relief concert on Oct 22, 2017.
https://www.instagram.com/p/BaiKfAeAu7N/
https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/21/politics/hurricane-relief-concert-five-former-presidents/index.html
Foreshadowing?
Gaga stood behind Bush Sr. and Bush and wore a white pantsuit—a favorite look of former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who the singer had supported in the 2016 election as she ran against now-President Donald Trump, who appeared at the One America Appeal in a taped video message.
Maybe it's symbolic of the "left" and "right" putting aside their differences and aligning against Trump? These posts are from quite early in his administration and there did seem to be a point at which the "R vs. D" narrative transformed into the "Democracy vs. Trump" narrative...
[H]arvey, [I]rma, and [M]aria were the hurricane names.
HIM?
Here is Trump's message:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G46NYFFBWyo
I notice that in the photo, none of the five presidents have a tie. (Tie removed?) Trump is wearing one. Trump's response is posted Oct 21st apparently.
The presidents don't appear to be in any sort of order that I can discern.
If you bring up the Oct 21st posts they are a pretty comprehensive call-out of human trafficking.
https://anontools.xyz/?text=oct+21
The two Bush presidents appear to be the only one with their suits unbuttoned.
Friend of mine says diamond imagery indicates Presidential-level escort. Marilyn Monroe, Elizabeth Taylor, Beyonce.
High priestess between two pillars?
So all that is to say, I'm still a bit lost on how 552 and 255 connect other than through the storm/hurricane theme...
Tune in tomorrow morning.
Adam Aaron took the bait and is forced to do everything possible to tank the company. I bought $1k a good ways back and he has diluted that to $50.
Trade it if you want but how can you expect a blackmailed CEO to make any headway?
I always thought the strategy here would be that Hunter would appeal all the way to SC and that Form 4473 was unconstitutional.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ded.82797/gov.uscourts.ded.82797.40.0.pdf
It'd be the perfect opportunity to do so since liberals would be motivated to find Hunter innocent, and conservatives would be happy with it too since it'd leave all his other potential charges outstanding.
I don't think it's a coincidence that the least damaging, least constitutional, most beneficially precedent-setting charge was brought against him...
Hunter isn't the ultimate target here. He was the money mule. The high value targets are the politicians who committed treason & violated their oaths of office.
They're being forced to share data at the expense of their reputation and time, so possibly.
On the other hand one might argue it's just standard warrant compliance...
X Corp. is asking the justices to consider whether social media services can be forced to share data about their users with government investigators while being barred from informing those users about the requests.
In an unprecedented end-run around executive privilege, Special Counsel Jack Smith obtained a nondisclosure order preventing Twitter from notifying former President Trump of a warrant for private communications that he sent and received during his presidency. Although Twitter had provided these communications to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), the government informed Twitter and the district court that it “did not want to obtain data from NARA, as it would require notification [to the former President] pursuant to the Presidential Records Act.”
So the act of being precluded from informing the user seems to be critical here.
Twitter argued the order was a prior restraint on speech subject to the procedural safeguards of Freedman v. Maryland, 380 U.S. 51 (1965), which requires that challenges to prior restraints be resolved in time to preserve the status quo
That is, Twitter sought to notify former President Trump in a manner that, like the PRA, protected potential constitutional privileges while accommodating any legitimate interest the government had in nondisclosure.
Meanwhile, the First Amendment rights of service providers like Twitter to notify users in time for them to assert privileges can be irreparably injured.
Ok yeah so first amendment rights of Twitter seem to be a big part of the case...
I'm having ChatGPT compare to the prior version and they seem highly similar.
When ChatGPT isn't being lobotomized about a topic it's quite fun to interact with. e.g. You can give it a prompt like "i'm looking for whether the writer of the more recent doc has created a loophole for themselves to fail to deliver shares in the coming weeks" and it'll go all conspiratorial.
Take a look at "Equity trade Capture & Reporting". The items that stand out to me as being useable:
Although it is an unlikely event, NSCC will process and accept Shortened Settlement (T0 Same Day Settling) orders submitted prior to 1:30 PM ET, if Exchanges are closed
PCF stands for "Portfolio Composition File". So it sounds like if an exchange closed, the participant could submit their PCF file early (before in-the-money options are automatically exercised at end of trading day).
PCF files for the following trade date will be accepted or, ETF Agents/ Sponsors have the choice to allow NSCC to Carry Forward prior days PCF for Standard baskets only. NSCC does not carry forward Create, Redeem, Cash or Custom PCF’s, these basket types may be submitted in primary or next day supplemental cycle.
It sounds like this would allow participants to essentially submit their prior day's PCF file--again, this would be before in-the-money options were automatically exercised).
Both those loopholes become irrelevant if DFV exercises early.
Oh this is dasting, looks like the first archive snapshot of this same document was March 2020.
We all know this isn't ultimately about Trump's content on Twitter, but rather Obama and others'.
Something to watch out for. I suspect the SC will give us a bit of nuance as to what white hats can extract and what the process should be.
Trump goes first so that the precedent is set and white hats know what to do & not so that their cases succeed.
u/#q2650