Another fun fact that supports your short essay, is the number of man in scientific terms. The primary element of the body is carbon, or, the carbon atom. A carbon atom has 3 parts. It's atomic number is 6.
There are:
- 6 electrons
- 6 protons
- 6 neutrons
- The number of man.
Thus I never bought in to ONE MAN being the antichrist. It is my thinking that "antichrist" refers to any who rebuke God, whether it be one man or 1 billion men. Those who do not follow God are "antichrist".
...and there's a lot of antichrist running around these days...
All points are the same many have concluded to be true and factual. Great summary!
Yeeeeh, if that doesn't snap someone's head awake....
That's just a pug. They walk around like everyone farted.
Historically speaking, and is true on every social media platform past and present, when someone fakes an acct of someone influential it is to sow discord with a facade of legitimacy.
Ergo, I would say altered or not at all true.
Make sure to ask her what the pivotal point that changed her paradigm or if it was a group of things. Ask what niggling thing in the back of her mind that you said turned out to be true and was it this that got her looking into more.
No reason other than curiosity. I always find it interesting the thing(s) that break the spell over people to wake up.
Redditards know nothing of the US Constitution or they'd know the supremacy clause. There is a absolutely Jack and Shit [they] can do to supersede the US Constitution that violates what is written in it.
Treaties and agreements do not supersede it either and any trying to force it are immediate traitors to the Nation.
Now, the MAIN enforcer(s) of these facts are We the People. If we lay down and accept what scraps from the dinner table the Elites throw at us, then stop your whining/barking and be a good dog. If you stand, growl, and then rip the fuckin arm off that's trying to hand you scraps, [they] will stop doing it. Problem is, too many have been "good dogs" for far too long.
If I see a single blue helmet, this dog is gonna fight like it has rabies. I didn't spend 24 years in the military to see our Nation handed over to weak-dick foreign decisions.
...and Constitutional Carry, which means you dont need a concealed or, for that matter, ANY permit as per the US Constitution's 2nd Amendment: As our forefathers and God intended.
Admiral Akbar voice IT'S A TRAP!!!
Taking shots as a handshake probably isn't the best approach. Just sayin...
Awesome info snapshot of the bigger picture. Thanks for this!!
And that will never change. True US Americans have it ingrained into their DNA and is akin to asking them to cut off an arm and a leg if you ask to give up our guns. Just ain't a consideration.
Yes, 100%. All of this.
This. I help if it's a genuine need/question. Problem is you get some talking out their ass and then get indignantly butthurt when corrected and demand, not ask, that you give proof. Fuck those people. I self educated and so can they.
Yup, this is big pet peeve of mine too. If I can spend 10 seconds on a Google search, then so the fuck can you.
Or, as I recently encountered, someone making an authoritative statement that was completely wrong, got called on it, then get indignant that their ignorance was noticed and demanded proof they were wrong.
It's like WTF, man. This is basic shit you should know and NOT have to be this dumb over. Don't speak about shit unless your argument is watertight.
Yep noticed that but didn't really jump out until you said something.
So, it's Showing Elon hasn't changed positions, but just how far left the tards have stretched the scale. Puts a new meaning on it.
Difference between a smart and analytical person changing their ways, and an outright moron that doubles down on their own BS. This is what the graphic shows, to me.
I dunno. I know there's a heap of skepticism over Elon, much of it very well justified. No daggers thrown here, I agree with almost all of it. Point is, someone who thinks for themselves and has the cognitive ability to analyze things is able to change. Is he changing or pandering to be with the cool kids? This is a question that will pan out in the future.
Not the base. 👍
I'm still fuzzy on why calling a republic that follows democratic principles a democratic republic is wrong.
I'll give you one example to chew on: The Democratic Peoples Republic of North Korea.
If that doesn't make things click, I'm not sure how else to get the point across.
Thanks. Some people get riled up by their own ignorance and try to defend it instead of saying, "thanks for the info", and seek out more info to dispel that ignorance.
It gets tiresome...
I'd be absolutely floored if this became law. Unfortunately, I've been around long enough to spot when a politician is trying to gain brownie points with constituents with a toothless bill. "Well folks I tried!"
Bingo. Nothing to add but agreement, as you pretty much nailed it.