You just learned this last night? You don't know anything about Alan Dershowitz? Alan is a Democrat lawyer, yes. But Alan believes in the Constitution; therefore, he believes in the law. He is a rarity among Democrats who want to abolish our Constitution and thus our laws. Alan is a good man. The left tried to implicate him in Epstein Island. He answered with the truth, and because they had no proof to refute what he said, the left actually backed down without offering more lies. They may fear Dershowitz as an insider who knows their games more than they fear President Trump.
We might live in the same place. :-)
You should not have complied. They cannot make you wear a mask. Compliance is all they want. Compliance means submission. Those who "ratted" you out should have been put to shame. They should have been asked if they knew the history of Nazi Germany and how the "rats" helped the cause of a great injustice. They should have been asked if they really feel that a pandemic can continue forever. I'm sorry, but when we decide to stand up for our rights, we don't sit down because someone rats us out. I live in Florida where the rats have left NY to visit here, but they aren't interested in the place where I live. You rat someone out where I live, and it won't go well for you. Rednecks and hillbillies may be the ones who end this crap once and for all. Someone has to stand up and remain standing.
Okay, gotcha. But I am the fifth generation of a seventh generation family who lives in the town across the Intracoastal from KSC. My father hobnobbed with Werher Von Braun; my in-laws worked on the early programs. My mother-in-law worked through most of the shuttle program and my father-in-law was an engineer with NASA and other contractors throughout his lengthy career. I'm one of the few people in the area who pay little attention to the space program. My family were boat builders, real estate owners, laborers, etc. The only time it interests me is when I live near a NASA weatherman, and I know when they say a hurricane is coming our way, I know we need to take action (our coast has currents that steer storms away from us 99% of the time--or it could be an old Indian curse, as we locals like to play up). I rarely know when a launch is going up. I was once driving and saw the bright light in the sky and called my office to see what rocket went up. "It was a shuttle," they said. I did not know because I was on a back road and not playing, "miss the tourist" with other locals as the tourists walked across a major highway thinking the locals would just stop and let them meander by. The most surprised I've been in years about something at the program was the SpaceX blow up on the pad that rocked us out of our seats. But I watched the different programs launch from my front yard. I generally remain inside and only swallow the poisonous chemicals that might come through my AC. And before they knew better, I watched the first launch from our local beach at the wildlife refuge. I think they only did that once. I don't believe we put that much money into any program to convince the Russians we're ahead of them. And I don't believe Elon Musk would have gone smaller and would have insisted that NASA did it the wrong way (he was right) if he had not learned from NASA's programs, their successes and their failures. And those engineers that worked out there, they were brilliant. We may think these SpaceX kids are geniuses, and they are, but I'd like to see them work calculations with a slide rule and not a computer. I saw the atmosphere change here during the shuttle program. There was a lack of pride. Challenger's tragedy should never have happened. They rushed that launch on a day that saw temperatures below most we see here. The O-ring was bound to fail. We knew, through our very shaken neighbor that there wasn't a 50% chance of Columbia's landing. They didn't even try to save that crew. "Failure is not an option" fell to the wayside, and I think it had to eventually so that Elon Musk could bring that back. Yes, Elon has failed, but we see that old spirit in these new geniuses. They don't mind failing because it is a learning process that protects those in the manned flights. Yeah, not a space program fan. Probably know more than I should because of my lack of interest, but I do believe we landed on the moon. Mars? I think they are ridiculous to try. The time range to get there ... forget it.
I'm not Catholic. I don't adhere to many Catholic apologetics (doctrines), but I do understand how sensationalist headlines can take down the good with the bad. I do not know much about Mother Teresa. I also don't believe that the Catholic Church "ordains" saints or appoints them. Saints are people who accept Christ and serve the Lord. Period. We really do have to examine the media and how they ruined truth. They did it just like the person with this post. For example, the article says that certain people within the organization were arrested. Arrested does not mean guilty--at least in America--not yet anyway. Yes, it means they are guilty in a court of public opinion. Do you not realize that this has how MSM gained its traction. They made us all into courts of opinion. They swayed us into believing what they wanted by giving us their opinion and backing it up with sensationalism. Mother Teresa could have been as close to human flawlessness as she could be. She could have been the devil incarnate. These woman could have been selling children ... or someone who has an argument or an anger with the church or with God may have made up stories. The articles are not journalism. They didn't seek truth. They fed what they needed to feed you to gain your biased opinion. So, if the MSM is really ever truly taken down, if we cannot teach ourselves what true journalism is, they are going to gain a very fast foothold into the door of misinformation again. For the love of the Lord, read about the correct way to write a news article. It doesn't begin with copying someone else's work to enforce your opinion. It means you dig into the information to find the truth and present it whether or not it fits the narrative you'd like it to fit. Lou Dobbs was fired from Fox News. He and Bartiroma are' were their last remaining journalist. When Maria goes, Fox is completely gone. She may not even be enough to hold them afloat. Look at why Lou was good at what he did. Look at why Martha McCallum became dirty as soon as she announced Arizona had called the race for Biden. Look at smug Bret Beir and at Cavuto, even at Carlson and Hannity. There is no journalism left. These are smug talking heads. Ingrham, whom I did have faith in, lost me as soon as she acquiesced to the stolen election. Fox's whole reason for the switch was to sway public opinion. Because that is all modern journalism has become.
He is wrong. If there is no military op, there will be no four years. There will be no elections. Why vote? The corrupt are in power and our Republic, the greatest government on earth, was tendered by a man who promised to clean it up. So, to believe these two men, I have to believe that Trump was a con artist or that Trump did not accomplish what he did, or that Trump believe that what he accomplished was enough to accomplish, and now the country can fold into communism and be handed over to the CCP. I have to believe that Trump forgets those who wrong him and who wrong others. And, quite, honestly, I have to believe that the military option has been released because if it hasn't, I know that I'm not the only one who believes suicide weekend will then be for those of us who believed and not the cabal who have harmed those children. I have to believe that Trump doesn't care about the children. More than anything I can't believe that because to believe that most of Trump's agenda was to save the children, I have to give up on the humanity in him and the humanity in all of us. So, I'll keep believing until this is absolutely proven correct or until Trump does what most of us believe he will do. I may live a few more days, a month, or years, but it does depend upon the state of humanity. Truly. If Trump let us down and we don't rise up, what does that say about us as countrymen? God is good and God is kind, but if God did not use Trump or did not use this awakening for us to save those children, I will lose my faith--not in God but in Whom I believe God to be. I will lose my faith in man who says they love God who would, when they understand what has happened to the children, will allow it to happen. I believe these two men did more harm than good. I believe they have crushed the souls of men. I believe they wanted the attention. If they so believe that Americans ave been deceived, why not what until they could encourage rather than discourage. My heart is very heavy this Sunday morning. Church will be difficult, but I will go, and I will pray ... for the children.
Just asking for everyone who lives in my county which hires SpaceX employees which is an extremely different atmosphere from California or other areas where launches are made. Why are they here? Why are they driving up the price of real estate (Homs like mine sell in the millions in CA and for less than $300,000 in my area but they are climbing. My home actually has a yard because before suckers from big cities arrived, we hated zero-lot lines). I receive interest in my home on a weekly basis ... because of SpaceX. Then I have to ask, where are all those heavy payloads going? How do you have Internet, Siriux radio, mobile phones? How do we have military. If SpaceX isn't real, why are we allowing launches from other countries? Are we okay with being behind or being shorthanded militarily. Maybe I'm not awake and you're being sarcastic. If so. ha ha. If not, you need to look into that which you do not believe. I don't believe in aliens, but I do research for any reliable evidence. I haven't seen Big Foot, but I think they exist. But no one is going to put morey into a space program to build magnificent rockets only to have the go ... I guess you're saying no where. I watch them go off at least twice a month. My in-laws worked at the space center through the programs and up until the shuttle program was cancelled. They earned a lot of money for something that didn't exist. My husband placed the tiles on the shuttles earning so much money he had paychecks gathering on his dresser. He couldn't spend the money he was making, and his parents had to force him to college. All of that for something that doesn't exist. Sometimes the non-believers believe they are the ones who are sane. Most times I think they are just closed minded and strange.
Oh my word. Journalism much: a story about a supposed president traveling on a plane that was not AF1 but actually the same plane he flew in as VP. A real journalism might be asking ... let me see ... what would be that first question ... Why?
Don't we usually see AF 1 in the pic? Asking for a friend.
Let's see, an unconstitutional impeachment conducted unconstitutionally without a Supreme Court justice, and against a private citizen. That will work out well, don't you think? Evidence presented. There's the "ha." Nothing about what is going on has anything to do with justice or law. It's a coup. It's an overthrow of America. Unless Trump walks through the doors of Congress flanked by heavy military, and he tells them the charade is over. The military has the country until things are straightened out and the hanging have commenced. I'm tired of hearing about clones and body doubles and previously conducted executions. That is fodder for fools. Get on with the show, and let those idiots who do not realize what has taken place catch up with the show--if they can even understand the ramifications of they willful ignorance.
You watch them because those who know human behavior realize there is a little truth in every liar or person who lies for attention. You disseminate the information by knowing the person/people you are dealing with. Charlie, Simon, Mel K, and Amy Vandersteel bring interesting things to the table. They haven't all panned out, but there are nuggets in their conversations. I believe Mel K. is trying to discern the information and be careful with it. The others have "sources." I don't believe much in "sources" lately. I will say the Flynn interview with Billings was a little disheartening, and I'm hoping it is just Flynn holding things close to his vest. The Lindell video was fascinating, but it leaves me with one question: "With all of this going on, if our military is not already in command, America is screwed. If Biden was allowed to steal so blatantly, America will not recover. On Billings interview, Flynn is talking about volunteering and running for office. Really? I'm going to put money into a campaign that the Chinese are going to hook to the local Internet, take votes for me around the world and return them for someone else. I'm holding out hope that we are under military rule and everything is in hand, but God help us if Chinese already owns us and we didn't fire a shot.
Not a put up or shut up statement. He's playing what if, as in, wouldn't it be something to see. I'd like to see the EBS go off tomorrow and cancel the Super Bowl. They can't even sell out a shell of the tickets. Could you imagine if they were allowing a full stadium how sad (but lovely) it would look? Those are my wouldn't it be something to see thoughts for the Super Bowl. We can all dream.
"Qanon" is crap. It doesn't exist. It's Q she should be fearing. Q allowed the anons to understand just how evil her father really was, and her momma ain't much better.
I think you have a very keen eye. The corners of the desk in the picture seem purposefully hidden, probably because they are not curved. The picture is taken in such a way that we can see the inlay on the top of the desk. The corners are covered, and you can't see the intricate design of the desk.
No those doors are in the real Oval Office. One reason I found is some kind of ease of design.
I pray to the Lord in Heaven above that when he says "new administration," he is talking about the military and/or Trump's new administration. Actually, if you read what he declares China is saying, they can't be talking about the fake administration. There is no way in hades that they would ever defend Americans. They have already faked an attempt to take away our sovereignty and freedom. The fake administration is doing well all on its own by way of punishing Americans. Get the real new administration in there soon, please.
If I knew how to do it (my ability at making memes is basic and I can't do changes to photographs), I would somehow use the scene from Blazing Saddles where Mel Brooks is signing the paperwork, replace Mel with Joe Biden and have the two well-built women watching and Hunter would be old Harvey's character. Mel Brooks must have been a time traveler. :-)
Why would anyone assume this is an ammo delivery? I mean, does our military use U-Haul and Enterprise trucks?
It's not that I don't like you. I don't know you. I'm speaking in respect to the fact that when faced with an idea you do not like, you discount the person with that idea or that research. That is very dangerous. It is sometimes referred to as the blind-leading-the-blind. An example I can give is as author and an editor, I've seen authors who never, and I mean never use "passive" forms of verbs or even the word "that." When challenged, they have no idea why they do it. They've just been told not to use those words or forms of words. When you explain the exact rule to them and have them read a sentence that definitely requires a passive form or the word 'that," they sometimes wake up and realize the rules have specific purposes and should be used in those instances. Others will continue to tell me I'm wrong. I edit and I write for a living. I'm a word geek. That's the best (and probably lamest example I can give you for how misinformation works). I argue with authors with whom I edit for a publisher on a daily basis about these rules. They will stand beside their misconceptions because a critique partner (not an industry professional, but someone learning just as they are learning) to their own detriment, and I have to ask before I make the correction and discount their argument, "Do you think I'm telling you a lie to ruin your career and make the publisher look unprofessional? No. I'm trying to keep you from looking like an uneducated author and to keep our company viable in the industry. Misinformation taken as fact without regard from where it come can make someone look unknowledgeable and it can make a system appear unprofessional or, for lack of a better word, like a bunch of lunatics--which is how they wish to see us anyway. We're handing them ammunition. The person who posted gave us information he/she said they researched--personally. If true, then the cancellation of a lie can keep us all from looking stupid, but I suggest we also do was that person asked. Look for ourselves. He or she didn't ask someone who knew someone who knew someone's grandmother and tell you to take their word for it. They did their own research and asked you to follow up with your own. I prefer to regard someone who does that than to take someone at their word. We are asked to question everything. So why would someone questioning something and trying to find an answer mean they need to be deported from a group who is supposedly seeking answers?
May I ask why we must block someone who may have done some research and may be providing us truth. For example, I'm doing research on "ha" in Trump's response to the articles of impeachment. X22 report has the "ha" highlighted in the word "that." I'm trying to see if the actual document had it highlighted or if this is just false hopium. I'm not trying to discredit anyone. I'm looking for the truth. You cannot find the truth if you discount everyone who is looking? Are you? Or are you taking everything at face value. That, to me, means that maybe you should be blocked or at least returned to Twitter where no one knows anything except what they are told.
Some of Q's first posts were about the arrest of Hillary, Podesta, and Huma. Then we learned it was misinformation. We were asked to look at what happened during that time instead. And the Anons who researched it found very interesting information. Q then explained that misdirection/misinformation is necessary. But I do believe that Q doesn't lie. Those arrests have been made or they are coming soon.
You are not wrong. A private citizen cannot be impeached. However, everyone of those SOBs who are trying to impeach DJT can be impeached. Or, as I prefer, they can be charged with treason and dispatched with a military tribunal and quickly dispatched.
Please learn how to read a legal document. This is Donald Trump's Answer (a form of pleading) to the Complaint (Impeachment). If you understand anything in law, an Answer is the Respondent's replay to the petition(s) made against him--and as noted so well by Trump's counsel--many complaints were set under one Impeachment, in an effort to gain a foothold by those who never want to see him in office). It seems Trump's counsel believes they placed so much into this impeachment that they plan to vote separately and thus gain, at some point, the percentage they need to keep Trump from seeking office again. Now that's the new American way of doing things, right? Screw the American people out of their Constitutional rights at every turn. Trump's counsel addresses each of the offenses he is alleged to have made. If you look closely, they agree that the impeachment document sets forth properly what the Constitution says.Trump and his counsel, though, deny that what those against him are doing is Constitutional, and they set forth his basis for that TRUTH. Trump's main argument is that he was not the president at the time the impeachment articles were presented to the Senate for a vote. TRUTH. And if he was not president at that time, he is a civilian: TRUTH. And as a civilian, he is not subject to impeachment: TRUTH. UNLESS MS. PELOSI THINKS SHE KNOWS SOMETHING NO ONE ELSE KNOWS--BUT REMEMBER--THESE PEOPLE ARE STUPID. Trump is not our president at this time. And that is the brilliance of all of this. Whether you choose to have hope that our military is, in fact, in charge of our nation (and we better be praying that is so) or whether Biden is truly in control (and if so, God help us all), Trump is not in office. He is a civilian. Either the military is in charge or Biden. Not Trump. He hasn't been our president since January 20 at--well, if we're to believe that we don't have to follow the Constitution--sometime before the Constitutional set time of 12:00 p.m., with Biden's hand on the Bible at 12:01. The inauguration happened before 12:00 and Biden's hand was not on the Bible--if that's what we want to call it--at 12:01 p.m. d all those who tried this treasonous action against him will pay. Can that be made any clearer? Probably so. I'm s clear as mud sometimes. So, feel free to clarify or correct. I have a legal background, but I'm not a Constitutional scholar. However, I think it should be the duty of every American citizen to study the Constitution and know it inside out. Our lack of knowledge is what has allowed the Democrats and Faux Republicans to screw us for years and to lead us up to this point where we truly believe we are a democracy slipping past socialism and hading into communism. America is a Constitutional Republic, and I pray to God that Trump is still fighting for us in his role as a civilian until we can reinstate him as the true president and hang the Chinese puppet.
Wait until they get to the tunnels under The Standard Hotel and learn how they were used by China and the rest for human trafficking. That hotel going down is a big battle in the war.
That I believe was a ploy to bring him down, to discredit him. You need to research and not depend on left-wing news or the Democrats. He didn't deny being on Epstein Island, but his story must have been irrefutable because the press left him alone after it. He was not there for a nefarious occasion. He was there alone with this family and I believe he indicated one housekeeper. It was before the place got up and running, and he knew nothing about what would happen on that island. Dig it up. Find the truth. I'm not a fan of Democrats, but I will give one who follows Constitutional Law his due. He has supported Trump with regard to the insaneness of both impeachments. He has not backed down.