A LOT of us remember WHAT THEY DID and WHAT THEY SAID when it all happened. We don't even need to dig it out of the Internet. They're idiots for thinking they can just pretend it didn't happen and that THEY didn't behave as they did.
Ah, EwwwTube up to its old tricks again.
Sign in to confirm you’re not a bot This helps protect our community. Learn more
Yeah. Stopping people (ONLY on THIS video) from viewing the vid unless they A) have a subscription and B) sign in -- that "protects our community." Kind of like vote fraud "protects our Democracy."
"Our community" = the Deep State, of course.
https://qalerts.net/?q=surveil
26 post(s) found containing "surveil" -- (and "surveillance", of course). Deep state's constant surveillance of the public and of Donald Trump in particular has certainly been highlighted in the Q drops.
I'd say this post is worthy of inclusion here.
Lead IS poisonous in sufficient amounts, AND it also IS USED to block radiation, including EMF. Was there really a good reason to completely remove it from PAINT -- how often did kids actually EAT paint chips?
I don't know if the health issues were sufficiently compelling to ban lead paint -- maybe they were -- and I also don't know how much lead paint on the walls of your home would block EMF signals. Anyone here with a cellphone AND lead paint on their walls?
But again, it sounds like something worth posting.
A1C is a measure of the average amount of glucose (sugar) in your blood over the past three months.
You can lower your A1C by
-
eating less carbohydrate and especially less refined sugar. Obviously, this is the healthiest method: Eat well and carefully.
-
taking Metformin (for type 2 diabetes in the early stages, and even for pre-diabetics). For that matter, Metformin activates AMPK, which is a boon for health in several ways, and the drug is cheap and without serious side-effects, unlike many other diabetes drugs. One study found that diabetics on Metformin OUTLIVED non-diabetics NOT taking the drug, and for that and other reasons, Metformin is currently being studied as a life extension therapy.
-
Taking more insulin (or begin taking it, which "advanced" type 2 diabetics often do). Insulin clears the blood of excess glucose, much of which in turn is basically turned into fat. You likely WILL gain weight on insulin, and it won't be the good-looking muscular kind. Injecting insulin has other downsides as well.
In my experience, almost ANY other approach is -- at best -- far less effective. Just as supplements claiming to slim you down are less effective than they sound, those that claim to lower your blood sugar are, in my experience and in the experience of others I know, at most a very minor help.
Seriously: if you want to lower your A1C, eat better.
On the other hand, to reduce organ damage and other symptoms from high blood sugar, there are several supplements that CAN be helpful.
- Benfotiamine (a form of vitamin B1)
- Carnosine
- Pyridoxal 5'-Phosphate (a form of B6)
and other supplements have been shown to protect kidneys and other organs from diabetic damage, and/or to prevent or reduce symptoms of diabetic neuropathy. Taken regularly in appropriate amounts, the right supplements can dramatically slow the organ damage that diabetes otherwise inflicts, although they don't have a similarly large effect on one's A1C.
More information:
https://www.lifeextension.com/protocols/metabolic-health/diabetes-and-glucose-control
https://www.lifeextension.com/protocols/neurological/neuropathy#
I'd say democracy LEADS to Communism. Technically, democracy is rule of the minority by the majority (the famous "two wolves and a sheep debating what to have for lunch"), but of course corrupted elections bring governance by criminals. Which is basically what Communism is: EVERYTHING owned and run by "the government", which means by the small criminal clique in control of the levers of power.
The point of a REPUBLIC is that the people choose their elected officials (which stops happening when vote fraud becomes rampant) WITHIN the framework of a constitution that limits the powers of those elected officials to certain specific areas (although that last point isn't listed in most definitions, but without it you're right back to having a group in power that can do anything -- they can be voted out, but not when the elections are shams).
THIS is why ELECTION INTEGRITY IS A FEDERAL MATTER, as Article 4, Section 4 makes clear:
Section 4
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
Over a year ago, someone in our tech group who runs IT for the 911 system in our area talked about his use for ChatGTP, describing how he uses it to cut the time he spends dealing with email, with network management, with programming, and for other things. It's a HUGE time-saver for him.
I'm retired but can say that for gathering information, AI (mostly Brave Browser's free LEO) is incredibly useful for finding details, stats, and other info quickly. A one-sentence prompt returns information in 2 seconds or less that would otherwise take me several minutes or longer (half an hour or more in some cases) to dig out of search engines. Most of the "consumer" angles for AI aren't of interest to me, but for gathering information (including sauce), AI is VERY useful.
Nice title, and thank you for the post itself Trump1234KAG.
It's worth noting that during the American Revolution, a big percentage of the population DID NOT support separation from England. Estimates vary (and support surely varied as time went on during the war itself) but here's Brave's AI (named LEO) on the topic:
According to the search results, historians today estimate that 40% of Americans supported the Revolution, 20% opposed it, and 40% tried to remain neutral. This estimate varies depending on the fluctuating fortunes of the war, with a majority likely favoring separation from Britain in 1776, but a lower percentage supporting the Revolution as the war declined in 1780.
More on the topic here: https://search.brave.com/search?q=percentage+of+Americans+who+supported+the+American+Revolution+in+the+1770s&summary
I mention this because I believe there's at least some similarity with our current situation.
One likely similarity is that after the Brits were kicked out of here and we all became AMERICANS, it took little time (well, maybe several years; maybe a bit longer) for the general public to identify AS "Americans" and to in most cases strongly embrace the IDEALS of the Revolution. There were plenty of exceptions, of course, but damn few people here were hoping for a return to Colonialism under the British boot-heel.
Likewise, I believe that even five years from now, much of the intellectual and at least a significant part of the emotional and spiritual damage Americans have sustained in the past decades will have faded and been replaced by a greater awareness of reality (including many things many people now refuse to face) and a trend toward greater emotional and spiritual health.
You can see this already, in the past election, the wide embrace of Trump and MAGA / MAHA, the rapid replacement of TDS with open support for most of Trump's policies, the growing acknowledgement of Satanism, sexual crimes (Diddy at the leading edge here), official corruption, corporate misconduct, and so on. Things are changing, and the change isn't slow.
Sheep there will always be, but their number will dwindle as sanity returns to the United States and, gradually, to more and more of the world.
Yes! So MUCH fraud in "scientific research".
Here's one for your DH:
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/and-like-that-the-claim-vaccines
EDIT / correction to my long comment above: there are 32 photos in that link (https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2019/08/woodstock-50-photos-1969/596107/), not 50. The article was published on the 50th anniversary of Woodstock.
You are right, no question, antiworldorder2. Nothing will ever completely solve the problem of bad choices. Legislation and government force certainly won't.
MAHA won't end poor choices like alcohol abuse, but substituting healthier ingredients for unhealthy ingredients and removing outright poisons from products sold as "food" will have a huge impact. People won't HAVE to make better choices in most cases; the better choices will be made by the producers, simply by requiring them to STOP POISONING THEIR CUSTOMERS.
People will still be able to over-eat, to eat poor diets, and so on, but they WON'T be eating artificial food colorings or a lot of other things already banned in most of the world. They probably won't be eating or drinking high-fructose corn syrup, or for that matter getting their children poisoned with umpty-nine "vaccines". They won't be getting addicted to cancer-causing, health-robbing frankenfoods carefully CREATED to be addicting. Food will again just be food.
BEFORE all this crap was stealthily inserted into our food (and elsewhere), Americans were mostly trim, fit, and healthy. Here's what Americans looked like in 1969:
https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2019/08/woodstock-50-photos-1969/596107/
See any fat people? These are ordinary young adults from all over the country -- roughly half a MILLION of them -- and not a fatso among them. Well, not in the fifty photos at the above link, anyway. And "trim and healthy" was indeed the norm at that time. Also, diabetes, asthma, and lots of other chronic conditions were rare instead of commonplace.
So yes, some will make bad choices; that can't be fixed (although reducing infant and childhood trauma CAN and DOES reduce the problem; those raised in a healthy, compassionate home without major traumas rarely grow up into druggies, criminals, alcoholics, etc -- but that's a long-term fix; something we SHOULD be tending to but not something that will solve the problem next year).
But MAHA will have a HUGE, POSITIVE impact -- if it doesn't get derailed in one way or another.
WTF every single one of the other states, actually. Only FIVE out of FIFTY so far?