1
NelsC 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hydrogen fuel cells have been a thing since the 60s. I built one as a science project using bits & pieces kindly donated by John Deere researchers. That is, if you are referring to the cells that catalyze H2 and O2 into water and directly generate electricity.

Henderson generator is not related to engines running on water/hydrogen, except as a possible source for power to separate the water to H2 and 02.

If Henderson generators work, just plug them to an electric motor, it's a more efficient transmission of energy than burning H2 and 02 in a combustion engine.

Energy conversion is subject to entropy, thus perpetual motion discussion is relevant. Hiding the power source by talking about "running on water" is carnival level distraction.

1
NelsC 1 point ago +1 / -0

Plants grow on the energy from the sun. It only temporarily slows entropy.

It's like water going downhill. You can use a dam to extract some useful energy, but all the water still ends up at the bottom of the hill. And whatever you created with that trapped energy is subject to entropy too.

However, there are clues that there is funky quantum stuff involved with life, so all bets are off as to what is really going on.

1
NelsC 1 point ago +1 / -0

Still, how much energy to purify aluminum? There is a lot of energy stored in pure aluminum. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium%E2%80%93air_battery

If they could get it to work, it'd be safer than lithium or gallium. But these are battery techniques, not fuel.

5
NelsC 5 points ago +5 / -0

Right, get your perpetual motion machine right here.

Getting more energy out of water than you have to put into crack it?

Entropy has been canceled. Mark this day.

1
NelsC 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jimstone.is has a simple recipe, claims it is as old as the Roman empire.

Here is how you make baby formula that's actually good for the kid: Take a half pound of barley and loosely tie it up in a cotton cloth that is porous. It has to be loosely woven cotton like this. This type of cotton is what was used in diapers before modern diapers. loosely tie the barley in it (the barley will expand) and put it in a pot with about 6 liters of water. Boil it for 6 - 7 hours. Pour the barley water off. Throw away the barley. There should be about 4 liters of water left after boiling (a slow covered boil) If you do it right the water should be bright pink. Mix that with three liters of milk and add a pound of sugar to the final 7 liter mix. If it comes out to 6 liters still add a pound of sugar, it will not be too much. The actual good limit is 27 ounces of sugar added to 7 liters. It is supposed to be sweet. The baby needs sugar for energy. Make sure you are not a snowflake and USE SUGAR, NOT A SUBSTITUTE. Corn syrup is also permissible in the same amount but nothing else. I'd add a couple grams of salt (just the tip of a teaspoon) to the final mix of about 7 liters and no more, it should not taste like it has salt. It should taste like it has NO SALT. Freeze what you are not going to use right away. You'll have a happy healthy baby, that recipe totally destroys commercial formula. I can back this up with hard data. That is THE RECIPE. If anyone posts a recipe more complicated or quicker or easier or more "nutritious" than that, it is a load of crap. That is the old Roman recipe that has been around for 2,000 years and it produces great results. I know this because the family used that recipe when a mother could not produce milk, it is all the kid had and the (not vaxxed) kid is sharp as a whip.

1
NelsC 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, it is. Iver+zinc clears out a lot of chronic viral and bacterial problems (Ivermectin is in class of macrolide antibiotics) that show up as autoimmune.

3
NelsC 3 points ago +3 / -0

Considering how widely used it is at the doses considered here, I wouldn't worry. It's safer than tylenol, which kills a few thousand every year primarily due to liver damage.

3
NelsC 3 points ago +3 / -0

Add zinc to help with chronic viral troubles. The combination hits more than ivermectin alone.

Some folks find fenbendazole, another anti-parasite, to have more impact than ivermection, some not - depends on your personal infectious troubles.

4
NelsC 4 points ago +4 / -0

When does Jewish movies about Christmas become cultural appropriation?

1
NelsC 1 point ago +1 / -0

Perjury in front of Congress is only a problem for Republicans. The time is seldom right to charge Democrats. If Lois Lerner and Eric Holder are examples, it's at least a decade.

Not meaning to cast shade on Rand Paul, he's doing what his position allows.

1
NelsC 1 point ago +1 / -0

Rand Paul deliver a blow? He's not a judge nor prosecutor, his only power is that of the soap box.

1
NelsC 1 point ago +1 / -0

Malaria is a parasite, not a virus nor a bacteria. I'd be worried about what they might consider a "vaccine".

1
NelsC 1 point ago +1 / -0

Today it means excessive, but for several thousand years it clearly meant any interest at all.

1
NelsC 1 point ago +1 / -0

Possibly Tetanus and Rabies vaccines have more upside than down, but the rest are poison.

1
NelsC 1 point ago +1 / -0

I do wish them luck. Zelenko and the FLCCC docs have a number of suggestions. A d-dimer test might allay some worries.

1
NelsC 1 point ago +1 / -0

Which is something he could not possibly prove or know only 9 months after the !vaxx was introduced. Given the benefit of the doubt, the doc was trying to reduce anxiety levels. But he was still telling a fib.

2
NelsC 2 points ago +2 / -0

If they know it takes 9 months to go away, then they know it started happening right when the shots came out. My guess it that the real knowledge is "it takes at least 9 months, but we haven't seen it go away yet".

3
NelsC 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, we had mail-in, but that's not the majority of ballots. Mail-in ballots are as easy to fake as the electronic votes, if not easier, especially if you get to count them last.

1
NelsC 1 point ago +1 / -0

NJ Rs are squishy, but it would be really good for them to

  1. ask for as complete an audit as possible.

  2. revise election process to make it easier to audit. NJ doesn't have any paper trail at all, and a lot of bit twiddling can be done that can't be tracked.

3
NelsC 3 points ago +3 / -0

In NJ, we need to push for an election process that is actually auditable. No paper here.

Maybe, in Bergen county, they can check the voter roles and verify that those extra thousands of votes were real people. Maybe not. I'm expecting lots of unexplained data loss and hardware failure.

1
NelsC 1 point ago +2 / -1

Sorry, NJ has a fully computerized voting system. No paper. It's going to take luck to find something that proves which bits were twiddled.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›