I know what you’re saying but the dollar pays for everything I buy so it’s not worthless.
“This vaccine may not be effective against future variants. That’s why it’s important to get this vaccine.”
Kek.
Oh my god that person is a mess. Doesn’t provide any links themselves just keeps calling you a selfish fuck. Either they’re a troll or just self loathing.
The dogs are okay with this right? Just making sure.
Exactly. And most people have actually gotten sick from the vaccine. So, it’s a gamble. Want to risk getting symptoms from the vaccine, or getting symptoms from the China Virus itself. I’ll take my chances on the China Virus.
The vaccine push makes no sense if it doesn’t actually stop transmission.
And that’s besides the point that’s the virus has a 99.7% survival but I digress.
Because he can still spread the virus. This is why having vaccine passes makes no sense. If you can still spread the virus while vaccinated, why have the pass?
Because it’s not true.
It’s literally a threat. It reads like an angsty high schooler. That’s who’s in control of those signs lol.
Can’t find any source on the testifying so I don’t believe this until a source is found.
Link to the first article? I can’t find it anywhere.
Couldn’t have said it better myself.
I visited California for the first time in 2019 and I asked a stranger to take a picture of me in front of Trump’s star. Immediately after a bunch of people wanted to do the same thing.
Silent majority.
Lol this always puts a smile on my face.
Absolutely incredible. It takes my brain some serious energy to even see Hitler and it’s still a massive stretch. Pure divide-mongering.
Ah, gotcha. Thanks.
Bruh. That’s Laura Bush.
Oh look more pandering after memory holing election fraud. Let’s see how many people fall for this theater.
That’s what I figured. Thanks for clarifying instead of downvoting with no response.
I must be really confused. It says that American diplomats were given anal swab test in China. How is that a win?
How is 6 a win? Because it’s Biden diplomats? I really don’t get it.
Didn’t Q already confirm he’s not?
Every point he makes is awesome except he’s mislabeling what she did. She literally said “to be clear for our viewers” and listed the evidence for those who didn’t watch the trial. She never took any side. His awesome point is made slightly embarrassing by misinterpreting (purposely?) what she said and her attitude about it.
I watched it three times and arrived at the same conclusion. She never was being dismissive of the evidence. Just bringing it up for the viewers.
Can you timestamp where she said “it’s just a check mark”? I watched it three times and can’t find it. To me it just sounds like she was being clear on evidence so the viewers who didn’t watch the trial are up to date.
Nope, I’ve never heard of figure of speech or sarcasm.
Correct. Q said first arrest will confirm direction.