We have never been at war with Mao, Stalin or Lenin. We have been at war against the NAZIs.
That may be why we are not seeing the commies in the movies as the bad guys.
It's also possible that the commies control Hollywood. Jewish persons were the majority of those who pushed the communist revolution in Russia. They are usually on the left and they control most of Hollywood as well.
We have never been at war with Mao, Stalin or Lenin. We have been at war against the NAZIs.
Few suggest Mao-ism; Stalin-ism; Lenin-ism; Nazi-ism and plural-ism (we) to tempt many into conflicts of reason (war) among one another.
Before one turns against others outwardly (reason); one utilizes ones weapon of choice to turn inwardly (logic). That's the foundation of war/wers - "to confuse; mix up"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/war
the commies
Few suggest commun-ism to tempt many together, hence unite (uni) together (com)....nature sets units apart from one another.
jewish persons were the majority
a) Gentiles represent the collectivized majority; tempted together by the jewish suggestion of collectivism.
b) Person implies per sonos (by sound) aka the separation of sound/sanus (entire; whole; all) into each unit (partial; one) within.
Each being represents a mind structured within (in-stru-ment) sound...few tempt many together to become masters of the orchestra, and suggestion tempts ones consenting choice to attach itself to another...like a string instrument, which then permits others to play one like a fiddle.
That movie has a reference to 17 right at the opening scene, and then multiple 17s. I am sure it was a WH movie. They even talk about Stalin's iconic picture with a girl, and Beria being convicted of abusing young kids amongst other things.
The rant by Stalin's son Vasily talkiing about the Zionists from NY is hilarious.
A lot of people don't realise that Stalin destroyed some of the most important Khazarians and he wanted to release USSR from the bankers' clutches. Kruschev who succeeded has all the signs of being a globalist puppet and tried really hard to bring the world to the nuclear war with the Cuban missile crisis. By that time the USSR was done, just a matter of a hard landing that took another 2 decades.
That movie has other redpills too, like how much the average people of Russia loved Stalin.
Well, there have been some using Stalin, but they are all older. Would Soviets as the bad guys count, they at least have been fairly often used whenever a movie set after WWII needs evil foreign operatives? And Chinese from Mao's era as well, at least in spy films, if Mao himself doesn't show in those.
Gulag Archipelago represents the kosher mainstream narrative, where any atrocity is done by communists; bolsheviks; mensheviks; stalinists; marxists; trotskyikes; soviets etc.
There is a rediculous amount of Hitler programming on the tube all the time , its maddening. But thats how it works, they are so hell bent on controlling narratives. My old man watches this show called "Oak Island" where a Scottish island is suppose to be a treasure site where the Knights Templars burried secret treasure. Well ten years later its like a commercial for the Templars. But when Leo Zagami got me up to speed its clearly a Jesuit production to push the narrative for the Knights Templars fairy tale. Revisionist history. They do it all the time with every high profile event. So they can show it to kids in school and play it forever. Like the Green Mile, and My Cousing VInnie.
A couple films about the Russian Civil War would be interesting.
It’s a period of time that rarely gets the attention it deserves given how era defining it was. Not to mention the cloak and dagger skullduggery and manipulations.
They were all actors in the Deep State's playbook! Those that controlled the world had world leaders playing roles of bad men, with full security that they were safe, once they played their part! Expand your thinking! White Hats have the same power now but it is being used as a force for good!
I watched a movie ,Kundun, directed by Martin Scorcese, it held no punches regarding the Chinese atrocities in Tibet, it was made in 1997. American made film about the Dalai Lama. It was made by Universal, who was bought out by Seagrams. The CEO of Seagram Edgar Bronfam Jr would not release it, due to pressure, as Seagrams sells liquor to China, it ended up at Disney, it was released on Christmas Day in 1997, due to pressure by the Chinese Communist party , it was a very limited release, in only two theatres, and distribution was very limited, so, unofficially, it was banned. I did see it in an "art house" cinema, known for good but small and controversial films.The movie was beautifully shot, filmed in Morocco, and I advise anyone who can to watch it, as I said, it pulls no punches. No matter what you think of Bhuddism, it clearly depicts what the Chinese Communist party does to nations it takes over. While not banned, it was silenced for main distribution. Its available for purchase as a DVD, and can be watched to stream on Amazon, Google play, and MUBI.
Strong pattern recognition.
We have never been at war with Mao, Stalin or Lenin. We have been at war against the NAZIs.
That may be why we are not seeing the commies in the movies as the bad guys.
It's also possible that the commies control Hollywood. Jewish persons were the majority of those who pushed the communist revolution in Russia. They are usually on the left and they control most of Hollywood as well.
Mao supported Vietnam. Without him they would not have been able to withstand our assault. Or even the French's really.
Stalin started the cold war. Said we were "aggressive." Decided to build soviet nuclear weapons and test them openly.
Lenin was only at war with his own people. He died 100 years ago.
Few suggest Mao-ism; Stalin-ism; Lenin-ism; Nazi-ism and plural-ism (we) to tempt many into conflicts of reason (war) among one another.
Before one turns against others outwardly (reason); one utilizes ones weapon of choice to turn inwardly (logic). That's the foundation of war/wers - "to confuse; mix up"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/war
Few suggest commun-ism to tempt many together, hence unite (uni) together (com)....nature sets units apart from one another.
a) Gentiles represent the collectivized majority; tempted together by the jewish suggestion of collectivism.
Only if gentiles are amassed together, can each jew operate apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
b) Person implies per sonos (by sound) aka the separation of sound/sanus (entire; whole; all) into each unit (partial; one) within.
Each being represents a mind structured within (in-stru-ment) sound...few tempt many together to become masters of the orchestra, and suggestion tempts ones consenting choice to attach itself to another...like a string instrument, which then permits others to play one like a fiddle.
One movie comes to mind: Manchurian Candidate
That's anti-commie, if I recall correctly
I get what the OP is saying, and it's generally true. But The Death of Stalin is a great anti-Stalin, anti-Soviet film.
It's the exception that proves the rule. yes. But it's a very good exception.
I’ve seen it. A good piece of work. Unfortunately, I can’t cite any other anti-Stalin work. If anyone else knows of some, please let me know.
I really liked that movie.
Press the button, Georgie!
That movie has a reference to 17 right at the opening scene, and then multiple 17s. I am sure it was a WH movie. They even talk about Stalin's iconic picture with a girl, and Beria being convicted of abusing young kids amongst other things.
The rant by Stalin's son Vasily talkiing about the Zionists from NY is hilarious.
A lot of people don't realise that Stalin destroyed some of the most important Khazarians and he wanted to release USSR from the bankers' clutches. Kruschev who succeeded has all the signs of being a globalist puppet and tried really hard to bring the world to the nuclear war with the Cuban missile crisis. By that time the USSR was done, just a matter of a hard landing that took another 2 decades.
That movie has other redpills too, like how much the average people of Russia loved Stalin.
BTW, one of my old comments that explore Stalin's role and Holodomor, if you are interested: https://greatawakening.win/p/15Hbz1lMbp/x/c/4OXHAEVAjhw
Well, there have been some using Stalin, but they are all older. Would Soviets as the bad guys count, they at least have been fairly often used whenever a movie set after WWII needs evil foreign operatives? And Chinese from Mao's era as well, at least in spy films, if Mao himself doesn't show in those.
But admittedly they are rarer.
Vanishingly rare.
Not allowed to notice……..
They should have done of movie on the Gulag Archipelago.
Then we would have no commies today....
200 Years together... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Hundred_Years_Together
Gulag Archipelago represents the kosher mainstream narrative, where any atrocity is done by communists; bolsheviks; mensheviks; stalinists; marxists; trotskyikes; soviets etc.
It's 200 Years Together where Solzhenitsyn drops the pretense of using alternative labels for "jew". That book isn't kosher... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbZZyVyEHGo
That guy knows how to ask a question. It was 7 years ago and could have been today.
I've been saying this for decades. Communists genocided more people than Hitler, yet not a peep from the left about it.
I believe Stalin holds the record for mass murder.
There is the fact that Hitler is by far the most well-known amongst the populous.
And why is that? His evil is frequently depicted, but the others are not.
but my 6 gorillion
Commies in Pedowood since the silent movie days.
Have a listen to this - it is on point and the podcast generally is good to wake even the sleepiest normie. Time to wake up the masses. https://open.spotify.com/episode/51F6ofRc92en1NJCjlqWaE?si=5k27myMEQ8WSnb6IDoI6XQ
I try to find some time to listen to it tomorrow.
Can be found on Rumble and other podcast platforms too I think...
I believe since early 2000 China starts buying up a majority of the film companies/studios
There is a rediculous amount of Hitler programming on the tube all the time , its maddening. But thats how it works, they are so hell bent on controlling narratives. My old man watches this show called "Oak Island" where a Scottish island is suppose to be a treasure site where the Knights Templars burried secret treasure. Well ten years later its like a commercial for the Templars. But when Leo Zagami got me up to speed its clearly a Jesuit production to push the narrative for the Knights Templars fairy tale. Revisionist history. They do it all the time with every high profile event. So they can show it to kids in school and play it forever. Like the Green Mile, and My Cousing VInnie.
Okay this was interesting. I started looking up movies about Stalin and came across some good list (not necessarily all Hollywood):
Death of Stalin (2017) - already listed by others
Burnt by the Sun (1994) - Set during Great Purges
The Inner Circle (1991)
Testament of Youth (2014) - British movie depicting the harsh realities of Soviet Union
Child 44 (2015) - Based on the book, myster thriller set in USSR depicts brutality of the regime
The Way Back (2010) - Escapees from a Siberian Gulag
Mr Jones (2019) - About Holodomor
East/West (1999) - French family going back to USSR. Depicts the Stalin's oppressive regime.
I’m going to start searching for these in streaming services or if they’re available on DVD.
Death of Stalin is very hilarious and full of redpills.
Don't watch Burnt by Sun. Its a Russian production but sadly I think they are Satanic. It has naked child scenes. Fucking pedos.
I am watching The Inner Circle and its coming along really good. Half way through.
A couple films about the Russian Civil War would be interesting.
It’s a period of time that rarely gets the attention it deserves given how era defining it was. Not to mention the cloak and dagger skullduggery and manipulations.
They don't want to give away their playbook. We almost got to see it IRL. I guess we actually got to see the first half ...
I’d like to see a biography on the other side of the camera that took photos of Nazi book burnings.
… considering they were burning sex grooming books.
They were all actors in the Deep State's playbook! Those that controlled the world had world leaders playing roles of bad men, with full security that they were safe, once they played their part! Expand your thinking! White Hats have the same power now but it is being used as a force for good!
Maybe they'd have gotten a movie had they been related to the Rothchilds like Hitler was.
I watched a movie ,Kundun, directed by Martin Scorcese, it held no punches regarding the Chinese atrocities in Tibet, it was made in 1997. American made film about the Dalai Lama. It was made by Universal, who was bought out by Seagrams. The CEO of Seagram Edgar Bronfam Jr would not release it, due to pressure, as Seagrams sells liquor to China, it ended up at Disney, it was released on Christmas Day in 1997, due to pressure by the Chinese Communist party , it was a very limited release, in only two theatres, and distribution was very limited, so, unofficially, it was banned. I did see it in an "art house" cinema, known for good but small and controversial films.The movie was beautifully shot, filmed in Morocco, and I advise anyone who can to watch it, as I said, it pulls no punches. No matter what you think of Bhuddism, it clearly depicts what the Chinese Communist party does to nations it takes over. While not banned, it was silenced for main distribution. Its available for purchase as a DVD, and can be watched to stream on Amazon, Google play, and MUBI.
Dave Chappelle knows.
Saved for last
Merry Christmas
Due to the length of, I’m saving this one for the weekend.