No, I’m angry because people on the same side as me lack basic critical thinking skills and instead use Magical Thinking ™ to support their arguments.
This is the kind of moronic hopium that makes our side look stupid as fuck. Go tell a semi-intelligent lefty that “the news referred to Trump as President Trump, so that means he’s still president!”, and that lefty will be lost forever.
He will use your extremely ridiculous non-evidence to “prove” to himself that our arguments are not based on fact.
I’m telling you that the news has always referred to former presidents by their title for at least a century, therefore the news calling Trump “President Trump” is ABSOLUTELY MEANINGLESS, based on past history.
Just like they call her “Secretary Clinton”, they called Bootyjuice “Mayor Bootyjuice” during the 2020 campaign, they call Bill “President Clinton” and Obama “President Obama”, and Joe “Vice President Biden”.
Instead of taking that information and either integrating it into your worldview, or arguing with evidence how I am wrong (either of which is what a true critical thinker would do), you choose to attack me for not believing Trump is still president (which I never claimed), and accuse ME of having cognitive bias.
Little child, grow the fuck up. You’re just plain wrong, here. Maybe Trump is still president, maybe he’s not - I do not know, and do not claim to know. But this “evidence” is not evidence at all either way. Because it’s not something different than what’s been done for 100+ years. Period. Full stop.
You may now commence ignoring every point I made, and engaging in ad hominum attacks, as you magical thinkers are wont to do…
Oh fuck off with the cognitive dissonance bullshit. I’m not arguing for or against Trump being in charge. I’m letting you know this “evidence” is not evidence either way.
Come on, man… seriously?
The news has always referred to every former president as “President Xxxx”
Putting your crypto on an exchange gives your crypto to that exchange, and as we learned with FTX, the exchange can do whatever it wants with your crypto.
Cold storage only.
2020 gave us all some insight into how this cunt keeps getting reelected...
Concur, but he probably also knows that California would use his lack of affirmation as cause to strip him of his parental rights.
No sense spending the rest of your life in prison if the state is just gonna cut his junk off anyways.
You’d think so, but I guarantee California would use the dad’s non-affirming as cause to invalidate his parental rights and make the boy a ward of the state.
Someone givin' away free puppies?
Mule deer, pronghorn, and javelina? Sounds like New Mexico =)
IT'S AN APRIL FOOLS VIDEO
He has not been recalled. He says so in the original Tiktok comments. @monicag2572 needs to learn some discernment. You too, Oblakhan.
And there’s TWO WHITE WOMEN, and only 1 black, 1 Hispanic and 1 Asian.
Why is this guy such a white nationalist?!?
Ok… what installation? Where? When? What anomaly? What do the radar images have to do with the photos of cell phone towers?
I know being autistic is difficult, but you’ve got to provide context for those of us who aren’t gifted with amazing pattern recognition.
I’m sorry, this isn’t clear or easily digestible at all. It’s a sequence of radar images and some Google maps pictures.
You need to add some context - a voice over would be great, or at least some verbiage as to what it is I’m supposed to be seeing.
Act weak when you are strong… 🤣
I know, friggin ridiculous 🥴
Looks like DJT dropped its financials over the weekend, showing significant losses.
Also, analysts consider Trump’s involvement to be a negative, what with all his lawsuits and “the fact that he may be in prison for the rest of his life”.
Additional context: Space Command existed from 1985 - 2002, and had a similar (but different) logo.
The current iteration of Space Command stood up in 2019, using the interesting new logo posted by OP.
Nah, that’s just video encoding glitches.
Underrated comment
What industry are you in? Let us know what you're skilled in, and maybe we can help...
The Constitution originally required you to be a landowner to vote. I think we should bring that back. There’s no need for universal suffrage in this country - that was a Soviet ploy (they loved to point out that they let women vote… but no one mentioned there was only one choice)
Also, the Texas Constitution used to state that anyone on government assistance (food stamps, welfare, whatever), and anyone found mentally deficient (that would be most lefties) would not be allowed to vote. Bring that back, too.
As an alternative, if you really want to change things up, how about a Starship Troopers scenario - you must earn your citizenship through some sort of hard work, service, or effort of some kind. Those who have not earned their citizenship yet may not vote.
Just thinking out loud, but shit has got to change or our great grandkids will just be right back in the same place again.
Thanks for a mentally stimulating post, Malachi!