I talked to high school history teacher who had no idea that the Crusades were as response to 3 centuries of Muslim conquests. They had no idea that North Africa and the Levant were largely Christian prior to the muslim conquests.
The also did not know that the turks had conquered most of south eastern europe and twice attacked Vienna. They though Turkey was disadvantaged because of European colonization.
They didnt know that the turks and barbary pirates went as far as iceland to capture white females and young boys to be sex slaves.
They didnt believe me when I tried to them straight on those topics because I don't have a degree.
You can never hate journalists enough
Same for some other groups that rush to complain about how persecuted they are.
Who owns the banks?
Library of Congress: Religion and the Founding of the American Republic
Look up data on consanguinious marriage. There might be a few in Alabama here and there but more than 1/3 of muslim marriages around the world are consanguinious and have likely been as far back as the 700s.
There are sections of the Bible that are prescriptive and some that are descriptive. The story of Lot and his daughters is descriptive. Its history, an acknowledgment of what occurred rather than a prescription of what we should all do.
In 1776 every American identified as some type of Christian with the exception of maybe 2000 Jews. There was no understanding of religion in the colonies except as Christian. What you are trying to do here is the same thing abortionists and trans people do to argue that since those are never mentioned in the Bible that they can't be wrong.
Multiculturalism doesnt work. When the 1st Amendment was written it only applied to federal offices. States were still free to institute religious tests for public office until the travesty that was the 14th Amendment. I would wager that had our forefathers anticipated the 14th the 1st would have been written differently.
Western democracy only works people brought up to respect and believe in western values. Western values are anathema to Muslims. (I should note I speak Arabic and have read the Qu'ran as well as studied a bit of Islamic jurisprudence)
John Adams, a Federalist, said "Our Constitution was made for only a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other," and that a statesman "may plan and speculate for Liberty, but it is Religion and Morality alone, which can establish Principles upon which Freedom can securely stand."
He and the other Federalists were arguing that, while the states were free to institute religious tests for state office, no group should ever be able to bar people elected from the states from holding federal office.
Basically, if the travesty of the 14th amendment hadn't occurred, Utah would have been free to require all state officials to be practitioners of Mormonism in good standing with their temple. Rhode Island could do the same for Catholics, Southern states could ban anyone who wasnt a member of a church in the Souther Baptists Conference, etc. In this example the 1st Amendment was to prevent the majority of protestant states from barring politicians from Utah or Rhode Island from holding federal office. This was particularly important for the Senate since senators were elected by state legislatures before the 17th amendment, which was another travesty.
The 1st amendment was never meant to open wide the flood gates for satanists, atheists, muslims, and Hindus to hold federal office, mostly because our forefathers could never have foreseen that we would allow and encourage mass immigration by people who's beliefs are so inimical to our nation and way of life.
The morals held by these devout Muslims are directly contrary to those held by our founders and the majority of Americans. Those muslims are also fanatically devout. Behead you devout. Toss gays off buildings devout. Die happy knowing they killed just one unbeliever devout. Their morals are incompatible with democratic societies.
"AKSHULLY, Devout muslims are heckin based, my guy. Sure they and their ancestors have been marrying first cousins for the past 1300 years or so, and they think marrying a 6 year old is okay, and they wipe their asses with their hand then splash water all over their face with the same hand, and sure they might do some acid attacks here and there and have a strange fondness for beheading christians But at least they devoutly believe in something, my guy. At least they're devout amiright?
Shut up. They are degenerates and they do not belong here.
No. Because they would want proof that you are homeschooling your children correctly. It will end up with only being able to homeschool if you use state approved curricula, take state achievement tests and allow homevisits at any time.
Pretending that there is an option out there that wont end up with me in jail and my children being raised and raped by their state appointed guardians is also retarded. So yeah. I'll pay my taxes and educate my kids and talk people into homeschooling their kids and try to get them to understand that once the governement gets involved in it we wont be able to homeschool as we see fit anymore.
Why would you cut out one section of what I wrote and then post your reply to it which is what I wrote directed after the section you cut out?
Ah. I see you are one of those retards too.
Government funds come with government oversight.
(And I know the government doesnt actually have any funds. It's all our money)
If I have to pay money to so that retards can have "government funded" indoctrination/daycare for their retarded kids I'm fine with that as long as they leave me alone to educate mine as I see fit. Once people start getting their tax money back because they homeschool their kids the bureaucrats will write laws so that ALL homeschoolers have to use state approved curricula or allow home visits.
Way too strong of a chin to be graham
That will be coming to texas soon. All the fucking idiots who just started homeschooling because of covid think that they should be able to collect a voucher from the state to use to buy curricula, not realizing that if that ever becomes law then the curricula will have to be approved.
It most certainly does. Abuse victims, if it can be verified, should always have the right to kill their abusers.
I'm sure there is an equivalent women's group and that they work out invitations for eachother
Practice the three S method. Shoot, shovel, shutup
Good fences make good neighbors
Yeah. Its mentioned near the start of the article
I told a friends wife who was complaining about illegals raping and robbing that I had a cheap solution to stop them from coming over which would also work for legal immigrants conviced of any serious crime. Execution or slavery. You could even sell licenses to sit at the border and shoot anyone crossing. We wouldnt need a wall.
She was shocked and outraged at my suggestion. The 19th amendment and its consequences have been a disaster for the american race
Huge dissapointment. Itll never happen because all the boomers seem to love him but I'm praying he loses the primary.
If they kept it behind closed doors that would be one thing, but they dont. They march, they put flags up everywhere, they grope eachother in front of the public and fuck in public parks at night. They are in every movie and tv show. They constantly throw "what two consenting adults do in the privacy of the bedroom" into every aspect of public life.