6
RandoMando2A 6 points ago +6 / -0

The whole premise of this seems flawed. Why would anyone, the president, the people, anyone, have to adhere to Freemasonry rituals to escape from Freemasonry controls unless they are Freemasons themselves?

The Freemasonry belief system has zero control over those who don’t believe or practice it. Simple declaration, will, and possibly force is all that would be required exit the system.

I can see it being a matter of legality on an individual’s level that is stuck in the environment of the system. There are legal and lawful rituals and paths that must be followed it I don’t see how a whole nation ditching a ritualistic legal system has to adhere to that system to free itself from it.

Just as our forefathers declared themselves independent and free men with the nation included under them so would our president or the administration lead the way for we as a people in declaration of independence and freedom. Which I believe was done. Look up Declaration of Independence 2.0.

1
RandoMando2A 1 point ago +1 / -0

Next time watch the Wizard of Oz withe the volume off and substitute Pink Floyd’s Dark Side of the Moon as the soundtrack. Cue the album to start at the 2nd roar of the MGM lion just before the movie starts. 🤯

3
RandoMando2A 3 points ago +3 / -0

WA learned from CA. The vote doesn’t even matter. Even if a tax or let’s say, gay marriage, was voted down. It will get implemented anyway by politically motivated courts.

Over turned CA Props:

Proposition 8 (2008), a state constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, was overturned by federal courts in Perry v. Schwarzenegger (2010) and Hollingsworth v. Perry (2013) for violating the U.S. Constitution, and was formally repealed by voters via Proposition 3 in 2024.

Proposition 14 (1964), which repealed fair housing laws, was overturned by courts as unconstitutional; Proposition 15 (1964), banning cable television, was also overturned by courts as unconstitutional.

Proposition 187 (1994), an anti-immigration measure, was ruled unconstitutional by a federal court in 1998 and subsequently voided via a court-approved stipulation ending the legal battle.

2
RandoMando2A 2 points ago +2 / -0

Makes you wonder who he’s marketing to. It’s so ridiculous you almost have to wonder if it’s a sacrificial white hat bringing negative attention to Islam.

Either that or the Muslim population in Texas is getting high enough to post some respectable numbers in a vote. They will vote however their Imam tells them to so their population numbers are directly related to their voting power.

1
RandoMando2A 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Red Tsunami in the midterms and/or the proven Election Fraud nulling out Brandon will lead to a supermajority in 2027. That’s when the real party starts!

3
RandoMando2A 3 points ago +3 / -0

Anyone inserted now is likely a placeholder until supermajority is in place next year. Then perhaps Nunez or Flynn.

2
RandoMando2A 2 points ago +2 / -0

Beat to the punch! No worries.

7
RandoMando2A 7 points ago +7 / -0

A vast majority of this country doesn’t even understand what gold is, monetarily speaking, let alone would they be willing to riot over it being missing. All they know and care about is paper dollars with, again, a great majority not even knowing they are not dollars at all, constitutionally speaking, but currency in the form of Federal Reserve Notes, aka promissory notes, aka debt.

6
RandoMando2A 6 points ago +6 / -0

Nothing that is digital is secure in this world.

This guy gets it. Most underrated comment in the internet.

3
RandoMando2A 3 points ago +3 / -0

Outstanding presentation on how much of a farce Islam is. Muhammad is such an incredible phony he tells Joseph Smith to hold his beer.

2
RandoMando2A 2 points ago +2 / -0

Underrated post. +1 is but all I can give, unfortunately.

5
RandoMando2A 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is why:

https://illinoisfamily.org/islam-sharia/knowing-four-arabic-words-may-save-our-civilization-from-islamic-takeover/

They are all wicked deceivers that seize on any and every opportunity to further their agenda of control. Even so far as breaking their own “code” and I say that loosely as that is tantamount to having no code.

Edit: spelling

2
RandoMando2A 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mostly agree with you, however, as with anything there is a limit that can be exceeded. Dispensationalism is not immune to this. However, people need to use some reading comprehension and get off, the no dispensations train.I am no hyper-dispensationalist but biblical dispensations are very real and must be acknowledged for an adequate understanding of God’s word. And please, whatever you do, leave Darby out of the conversation. Dispensations were spoken of and taught long before him and date back to the early church. Same goes for pre-trib rapture but that is another conversation.

The word dispensation appears in the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible in four specific verses, all located in the New Testament. It is a translation of the Greek word oikonomia, which generally means stewardship, administration, or management.

1 Corinthians 9:17: Paul refers to the "dispensation" (stewardship) of the gospel committed to him.

Ephesians 1:10: Refers to God’s plan to gather all things in Christ "in the dispensation of the fulness of times."

Ephesians 3:2: Paul mentions the "dispensation" (stewardship) of God’s grace given to him for the Gentiles.

Colossians 1:25: Paul states he became a minister "according to the dispensation of God" given to him to fulfill the word.

Same with Zionism:

What does God say about Zion?

2 Samuel 5:7 (fist ever use of the word Zion)

Psalm 2:1-6, 11-12

Zechariah 2:10

Zechariah 8:3

1 Peter 2:6

Romans 11:26

People need to stop speaking for God and listening to people that interject and try to speak for Him. His word stands and He speaks for himself. You have a beef with God you better sit down and open His word and reason with Him about it. If you’re not reasoning with the source of the knowledge you’re being deceived.

2
RandoMando2A 2 points ago +2 / -0

As opposed to free handouts of their people’s money without requiring proof? YES!

5
RandoMando2A 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is the way. As long as the landowner isn’t too greedy they can most likely turn it into generational income for their family. The land will be claimed by imminent domain as the AI race is more about Gov world domination than Corp profits and national security will be used to uphold the taking of the land. Might as well try to get some kind of longevity out of it.

4
RandoMando2A 4 points ago +4 / -0

Don’t bother. All these data centers are being done by Gov request and imminent domain will be upheld due to national security reasons. The AI race is more about world domination than profits.

6
RandoMando2A 6 points ago +6 / -0

Can you please share the amount of each part and how you apply your concoction? I too would like some relief from arthritis.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›