2
RaymondBPanelli 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think you're right, supposedly it already served it's purpose keeping Pelosi out of the presidency a few years back.

1
RaymondBPanelli 1 point ago +1 / -0

We're currently a little over 3 years into the vax, and while there are some signals here and there, it's clear the vaccines are not killing as many as they hoped. The impact on fertility going forward may be the more serious issue.

2
RaymondBPanelli 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not found

1
RaymondBPanelli 1 point ago +2 / -1

Would need to know the location since different locations might have different prices.

5
RaymondBPanelli 5 points ago +8 / -3

Who is this John Cullen and where did he come from?

This is the same person who was adamant that an insect flying past Trump was a bullet the other day...

I suspect disinfo.

1
RaymondBPanelli 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's this wishful thinking on Trump's part? Or has Kamala actually agreed to this. I'm seeing conflicting posts.

3
RaymondBPanelli 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is he a top investigator with a proven track record or is he purposely spreading disinfo? Be careful who you follow.

12
RaymondBPanelli 12 points ago +12 / -0

The Krassenstein brothers!

2
RaymondBPanelli 2 points ago +2 / -0

That thing is traveling about 30 feet per second tops, assuming the video is 60 frames per second. Even if we imagine the thing is approaching at a steep angle towards camera it's still less than 150 feet per second.

3
RaymondBPanelli 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly. Looking at John Cullens video, each frame the "bullet" seems to be only moving several inches, maybe a foot or two depending on the angle of approach. It's way too slow to be a bullet.

5
RaymondBPanelli 5 points ago +7 / -2

That wasn't a high speed video camera though, it was a still camera that takes quick bursts of photos, one of which captured a bullet. Very different from high speed video.

2
RaymondBPanelli 2 points ago +2 / -0

That may be so but at 120fps that frame rate is nowhere close to being able to capture a bullet for 5-6 frames consecutively.

5
RaymondBPanelli 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's fair, but because we see the "bullet" for 5-6 frames, that means the video must have a very high speed FPS, greater than 8000 frames per second in all likelihood. Consumer cameras don't have that capability. I still think it's an insect catching the light or something.

11
RaymondBPanelli 11 points ago +11 / -0

This looks like an insect flying by. Zero motion blur. Even the NYT photographer Doug Mills has motion blur in his famous photo, which was taken at 1/8000.

4
RaymondBPanelli 4 points ago +4 / -0

Someone named Kim Clement might say this was a very "strange" July.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›