Maybe what you're seeing is the difference between intelligence and wisdom.
Our debt based money system has a lifespan and it's coming to the end of it whether we want it to or not. The question is, who controls the narrative when the current system dies. If it's the globalist then we would have the "Great Reset" where the result is a global currency controlled by a central authority (one world government). If it's the populists however, then perhaps we return to sound money operated sovereignly by each nation.
Exactly this. They are making so much money off this "digital battlefield".
This is the way
I've never had covid because I've never been tested.
I love Christian rap but I am running out of artists to listen to. Lecrae's direction has been disappointing, I still hope he can come around someday. He really got messed up in the Obama era.
I essentially just listen to Bizzle at this point. Last one left willing to speak the truth.
Jokes on you. I go to a local brewery ran by Christians and it's great.
Dr Pepper and candy. They are actually children.
"We gave it our all. Now we need to keep our chins up and go back to our lives as best we are able. We have a new president sworn in and it is our responsibility as citizens to respect the Constitution regardless of whether or not we agree with the specifics or details regarding officials who are sworn in. As we enter into the next administration please remember all the friends and happy memories we made together over the past few years.
Ill have more to say in a few days regarding a new project i’m currently fleshing out.
God bless."
- CodeMonkeyz (Jan. 20th)
I'd rather keep fighting to defend our Constitution. I'm glad the great patriots in Arizona didn't heed his advice.
I don't trust CodeMonkeyz. The Guardian wrote a hit piece on Telegram today, and then the same day a large Telegram user "gets banned". Sure.
The banks are overwhelmed with cash right now. Look at how the overnight reverse repo keeps climbing. Maybe it was done with a motive, but it's also possible banks are busting at the seams and are desperate to remove liabilities from their balance sheet.
This is a misleading headline. They freed part of the ship that was easiest to free, but the bow is still very much stuck and containers might need to be removed to refloat.
Yeah, I personally think this is a really big deal. I expected the markets to react dramatically, but it essentially just dipped and recovered. Now I think we're going to live out the fantasy as long as possible.
No, he's never going to do one of those.
I mean. The Cabals plan was to kill billions, we can only imagine the horrors that were avoided.
The moment before a crash is always euphoric.
We all get to help in taking down the Fed. What could be better than that. It's right up there with voting for Trump as far as participation from the average citizens.
If an alcoholic desires alcohol but refrains is he still considered sober?
People who struggle with addiction know that some of those desires may never disappear. That doesn't diminish their success in refraining from the action.
Also, the push for homosexuality and transgenderism are part of the depopulation agenda.
Thanks fren. I appreciate this and I agree with almost all of it. The only thing that sticks out like a sore thumb is the banning of links to George News but not the discussion.
If George is going to be discussed still on GA wouldn't it be prudent to have links as proof, otherwise all discussion is simply hearsay. If a mod has determined they have the absolute proof that an entity is untrustworthy why would they still allow discussion? On the flip side, if we are not 100% certain on the trustworthiness of George, then why block links to potentially valuable information? The middle of the lane approach really doesn't add up and frankly feels like Facebook/Twitter where discussion of a topic isn't banned (at first) but links to prove the points you are making are banned if it is linking to certain outlets the factcheckers have determined "untrustworthy sources".
It is in reference to POTATUS. There's a poll about it on their Telegram this morning asking if George News should bring back reporting on daily WH movements or not. One of the options is "No, I don't care about following the Biden 'admin'."
I'd give a link but links to George are banned.
It's actually nuts. The logical hoops you have to jump through to use George banning users as some sort of proof while simultaneously banning users at the drop of a hat on GA. It's quite the double standard. Or maybe we should just concur that GA is no longer trustworthy because it is banning users... I mean that is the premise we're building the case upon right?
I'd imagine they moon after/during a market crash when funds are getting blown up and no longer have the collateral to meet the margin requirements on their short positions.