I am going to repeat myself:
The NPP strike is a Ukrainian rumor, as far as I can tell. IMO, do your own research.
Nothing on the Russian airwaves about a NPP strike in Russia. either they shot whatever it was out of the sky, and it is TOATS commonplace, because nothing happens if they say anything about it, so the story is not really newsworthy; or it didn't happen.
Neither do I see any usual suspect News like Al JAzeera or Hindustan Times, or Asian Times articles talking in hushed, scared WW3 tones.
BUT:
Reuters (CIA) SAYS that Russia interce[ted a drone today (How do they know): https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-intercepts-drone-near-kursk-no-damage-nuclear-plant-governor-says-2024-10-03/
Oh, what have we here?
Several Russian Telegram channels earlier reported the alleged Ukrainian attack, which they said had been thwarted by air defences but had resulted in a fire several miles from the nuclear plant.
[Insert credible source noises]
Lo!
Reuters could not independently confirm the reports. THEY ADMIT IT.
And then they start working on the narrative:
Ukrainian forces entered Kursk region in a surprise cross-border incursion on Aug. 6 and remain there (edit: forever) even as the Russian military tries to eject them (edit: by slaughtering the people they find hiding in the bushes, - oh and the invaders cannot escape or receive supplies).
Well the NPP strike is a Ukrainian rumor, as far as I can tell. The Russians did hit a huge ammo-dump with one of those FAB 3000s, if that helps.
Nothing on the Russian airwaves about a NPP strike in Russia. either they shot whatever it was out of the sky, and it is TOATS commonplace, because nothing happens if they say anything about it, so the story is not really newsworthy; or it didn't happen.
send billions to ukraine
send billions to israel and acted as their personal bodyguard in the region
Appoint Kamala as Border Czar
spend $Billions money on flights, buses, accomodation, phones and $10000 migrant cards
Spend money on Inflation Reduction Act, which does the opposite
grocery prices spike - oopsie - and the government doesnt even bother helping the population after a hurricane (oh $750, if you apply online - like where is that when all lines are down? - , for later: when u prove you are in dire straits.)
We ran out of money
We ARe WiNninG
I thought that the precipice was something to do with nukes and an almost-WW3.
But a real storm is certainly possible in the Q lexicon. And all this stuff is about waking up people. A comfy real storm is more likely to wake people up to corruption.
A Nukes-and-WW3 narrative does not really play that well when you are trying to move a supply of baby-formula via mule.
So, Iran 'sploded some DU munitions? And what were US soldiers doing there? The latter might explain the apparent ducking.... and, Iran stated that it was their response for the assassination of Suleimani. So, this is a tit-for-tat, and allowed under International warfare.
OR
Iran used nukey stuff? Which is what they are implying, in their rush to declare war - a potential Casus Belli. Be careful, because WW3.
Any proper investigation can determine the origin of radioactive materials - there is a footprint - just saying.
So it's Russia, Russia, Russia 2.0?
Anyone revealing account details and opening their device to spear-fishing attempts - by replying to, or pushing links in a random email - when they are working for a 'think-tank', are stoopid. Anyone working in public service should have a robust fire-wall and an IT policy. If they get hacked in such a way, they do not deserve their amaaazing 'academic' accolades, and deserve whatever is coming to them.
American think-tanks are an oxymoron anyway. They know nothing of C21 warfare, and talk in ideological wants. We did realize that US has clandestinely declared war on Russia, right? Oh, and Russia has nukes.
So, we can see that the think-tanks are still talking WW2 Patton (tank maneuvers) tactics, or have a look at:
Copyright © 1997 by Zbigniew Brzezinski. https://www.cia.gov/library/abbottabad-compound/BD/BD4CE651B07CCB8CB069F9999F0EADEE_Zbigniew_Brzezinski_-_The_Grand_ChessBoard.pdf
i.e. The plan of 'breaking up' Russia. Americans are Totally innocent. /s
Also Star-Blizzard. Pull the other one - it has bells on it. Definitely Russian /s. Yep. I mean Stars are TOATS Russian, and Russians have akshual snow. So makes sense, right? Right?
The border crisis was an emergency, and now they are out of money. Ooops.
There's no room for American flood-victims.
No room!' they cried out when they saw Alice coming. `There's plenty of room!' said Alice indignantly, and she sat down in a large arm-chair at one end of the table.
Oh yes. The Traitor Angle. What is the punishment for treason again?
There is a point: Trump stepped down and handed the keys to Joe. So, who is the injured party? On the face of it, he conceded. Nevertheless, the Dems need to prove Trump is a criminal. In my opinion, the whole insumm-erection, and the 'consipracy to stop official proceedings' is a dud of a court-case, because the Democrats won (the halting-proceeding thing happens to be constitutionally protected, when there is suspicion of fraud. It also happened to be vetted by Trump's attorneys, before going ahead, which makes Dems seethe). Their Mens Rea is that he changed his legal team (hired a world-class lawyer -Guiliani), because he 'wanted' to win. Wow.
There is a fuzzy area, which these operatives are jamming on. They claim that Trump falsely claimed mail-in ballots were open to fraud, pre-election. Weeeell those ballots kinda are, as found by multiple Western and Eastern countries, but we didn't know for sure at the time, when Trump declared Victory on election night, supposedly. Apart from such a statement being an opinion, sooo, a huge grey area, they try and make this a criminal charge. We all saw what happened: the 'fraud' graphs, just saying. We all had questions.
And, they say that he 'knew' it was a false claim, despite multple advisors telling him otherwise. So now, they are weasel-wording that the President does not have discretion in his core-beliefs. A President is not allowed to have an opinion, apparently, if a bunch of experts say otherwise. And seeking second opinions from other lawyers is somehow fraudulent behaviour. Definitely bad orange-man.
Then, there is the fact that Fox News declared Arizona Democrat, on the night of the election. Which is ridiculous, because Arizona had the longest pause before declaring anything, so how did Fox know, other than having an agenda of 'shaping narratives'? Totally 'not a fraudulent claim', at all. And the numbers kept shifting. Fraud without proof. Suuure.
Oh and the video of suitcases in Georgia - claims were definitely de-bunked. Yep. Totally investigated, and Guiliani had to press the matter. How dared he. LOL
And mean tweets. Definitely evidence /s.
Here we go: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7gfrbRi0co
Cool, I saw this one re: helicopter drops https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAPEBKhMS8
Eh?
So anyone who obtains a ballot overseas can vote without ID in the most important election on Earth?
Erm.
What could possibly go wrong?
Also, if those overseas voters are real, they are in the armed services. Likely they are not akshully Democrat. At best, they are undecided, because they want to advance in their careers, and don't want to appear political. Just saying. At worst they are loyal Republicans, with knobs on.
If they are in the military, they have lotsa ID and access to secure (lol hackers) computers. So why not ask for it?
It was such a grin.