Yes, agreed. However, he said 'fight' multiple times, and he teamed up with the Allies. Also, he picked the winning side, historically speaking.
So WC did play a complex game. He was an experienced war-historian, so knew the stakes, and the art of propaganda and rhetorical speach. So, you are right, but I think 'puppet' may be too mild a label. He was one of the masterminds.
There are some news anchors (can't remember which one, someone plz. fix-fix) who say that the fight, fight, fight fist-pump was an incitement to civil war. How dare Trump etc.
The man had to get the crowd to know he was alright, and he had to do it quickly. is my opnion.
As far as ramifications
Even though large tracts of Europe and many old and famous States have fallen or may fall into the grip of the Gestapo and all the odious apparatus of Nazi rule, we shall not flag or fail. We shall go on to the end, we shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender, (Winston Churchill, June 4, 1940, WE SHALL FIGHT ON THE BEACHES, https://winstonchurchill.org/resources/speeches/1940-the-finest-hour/we-shall-fight-on-the-beaches/)
Tranlate above as, keep fighting, we are winning.
Alex Jones discusses the unforgivable security failures surrounding the attempted assassination of former President Trump on Saturday, which have led many to question the Secret Service and whether its failure to protect Trump was just a major mistake or a deliberate stand down. We’ll break it all down!
Also, this is classic Alex Jones, and yes he was predicting this 5 weeks ago. and he is tying in a whole lotta stuff.
Did anyone have this on their Bingo Card? Alex did.
Yes, and there is the idea that if Putin endorses any candidate, or even expresses some sympathy for having-been-shot, then the Press over here will stoke up the Russia, Russia, Russia chant again.
Mind you, Putin did say that he was fine with Biden because the latter was an experienced politician, and more "predictable". But I think that may be a troll, TBH. Too subtle for the press to attack.
I don't think they are gloating.
‘Eliminate Him’: A look at the violent rhetoric against Donald Trump https://www.rt.com/news/601061-donald-trump-death-threats/
Also, that same publication (Breitbart) states that Fico thinks the same thing, so it's not a gloating thing to say, it is a common idea: https://greatawakening.win/p/17teJ4gvLk/slovakian-prime-minister-who-sur/c/ and the latter went through the same thing, so is speaking from experience, IMO.
The media now have a choice.
Continue the charade that Trump is not 'democratic' and a mad mr Hitler - fomenting hate; or start reporting properly, by deriding what comes out of these lurid Democrat mouths, and showing what the 'other side' thinks, thereby making the story a beginning of a debate, not a labelling competition.
Also, Farage is on the correct path. I hope there are some Russian and Chinese delegations, TBH. I wish to see a bunch of world leaders stand shoulder to shoulder with Trump. Did Orban send a message yet? Fico?
Some interesting comments made by the speakers.
Common sense Republiicans standing up against stupid media trying to steer the narrative, towards it was TruMp's oWn faUlt..
Have been watching it, and it appears t be on a loop. So it's about 10 minutes.
Body Language Ghost did a nice piece with good footage. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UwWxJQN_sY
Yes.
But I believe God is on the side of the White hats, just as Lucifer is on the side of the Black Hats. God is in Control. The White Hats are tapping into his power.
God won this time, and NCSWIC, because he will win some more. I am praying for an end to the forever wars, myself.
Well, the sniper-team had the guy in their sights, so they knew he was there.
My gribbly issue is that they didn't say that there was a shooter in their sights. Or, perhaps they did say something, and the order from above was to stand down (until further notice). At the crucial moment the sniper simply decided to shoot for himself, when multiple shots were fired (Good on him). Which makes the decisions made by higher-ups a suspicious error IMO.
Or perhaps it is really a systemic error. Why are there central command peeps trying to 'calm' down a situation (don't shoot yet) when there is an armed shooter sitting on a roof, aiming at a president? You would think a sensible person would shoot the potential shooter straight away, with no ethical re-percussions. I would say that in future, a SS sniper should have full discretion - while talking on open comms, so that all on the ground are aware he is training his rifle at a shooter. Like a de-centralized comms system, as opposed to a centralized one that channels through a 'superviser'.
indeed. Glad you caught that.