I am more interested in the communications hub. Who was in charge of integrating all the services that were there? There should have been a message that the snipers, who set up only minutes before, already had a target in their sights. I dunno, the sniper's spotter could have said something at least. The SS and others reacted pretty quickly in the seconds after, however, it's the critical minutes and seconds before the shot that has us asking questions.
This always happens in real Safety meetings. One understands how sharp-shooting works, for example, and a proper check would have suggested stringing that flag somewhere else. But inb4: some say that such a flag is always done at rallies. REALLY??
Re: optics/scope
Some very rare individuals (Annie Oakley?) can shoot that distance without a scope, but there was also quite a breeze blowing, which only the very best can gauge/learn to overcome via test-shots, especially if shooting 'instinctively'.
So I believe the shooter WAS using a well-calibrated-for-that-distance scope, and was trained to check the flag for gusts. Missing like that, is not really missing by much, in terms of a paper target. One would still be on the paper, if you know what I mean.
I don't think it is that guy, TBH - I saw a rumor of a proof of life Insta post. Who knows what's actually going on. We are now in a fog of propaganda-war.
The statement from the FBI is that they have not released the name. I dunno what to think about that. We are also in the fog and dust of a collapsing empire.
Also: It certainly was staged: there was a ruddy great wind-indicator, handily disguised as a USA flag, hanging over Trump's head. Someone put it there so that they could calibrate their shot.
Also #2: A basic safety-against-assassins scan would have picked that flag up. Firing ranges have those wind indicators too. So experienced people will immediately remove a wind indicator over the president's head. But, Biden is on record refusing SS for Trump. So maybe 'just' incomptence.
Also #3: The snipers killed the shooter within seconds. That means that they had their scopes trained on that guy. So, that looks pretty staged. But, why did they not stop the guy climbing onto the roof, using local police or security guards? Communications failure. That looks preddy bad. Why did they not tell the guys on the ground that there was a possible shooter lying on the roof, over there, we be scoping him out (and hold your fire, from above), unlike the wary pepes in the crowd, who yelled out and pointed.
Thank God. And PSA: The FBI is on the case.
Shower thought threory but droppin' it here:
There were reports of people pointing at the shooter on the roof. Over there! Trump looks at what they are pointing at, turning his head just as the bullet flies. Bullet clips ear NOT "emulates watermelon explosion". God spake.
Yes well, we have our share of glowie shills.
Check my post about what an assination attempt does to an election: https://greatawakening.win/p/17teEUqauG/the-last-time-an-assassination-a/c/
FBI says it is him https://i.4cdn.org/pol/1720936907495632.jpg But who believes them anymore?
Noice. I tried to do that, but the serach functions look all different. Which one did you use?
Anyway. Re: 128 - Are there still some W H in the C I A ? That's the Qurly kwestion IMO. Do we pray for them? Or us, because things are about to go AWOL? In any case, there is a very murky cloak and dagger game afoot, and I have no doubt there is a myth of fingerprints, so to speak. One thing is for sure, is that we are now in a spell-lifting phase. And is the keystone the Clinton empire?
RE: 963 Are we now in stage 5.5? I mean the 'y' is right nest to it. [Cross reference Law of War manual]:
5.5 DISCRIMINATION IN CONDUCTING ATTACKS Under the principle of distinction, combatants may make enemy combatants and other military objectives the object of attack, but may not make the civilian population and other protected persons and objects the object of attack.
In planning and conducting attacks, decisions or determinations that a person or object isa military objective must be made in good faith based on the information available at the time, and those who plan or decide upon an attack must take feasible precautions to verify that the targets to be attacked are military objectives
Given that we must think the opposite of what Democrat-leaning CNN normally peddles - What if it WAS an inside job (and that's the main reason for shutting down the conversation)? What does that mean?
I don't think Trump was in on that alleged inside (Who would volunteer to be the 'victim' to have their ear shot on such a windy day, at that distance? I mean the shooter could fail to shoot the ear and shoot the head instead - oops) My reasoning is that this is not a William Tell epic narrative where people volunteer to have the apple shot, which is perched on their heads, just so that they can win a little harder. Which means that it is a Black Hat inside-job, i.e. the SS are compromised. I can see why the CNN shut the conversation down at that point, TBH. It's too horrible to imagine. However, WE know of Fbi pulling nasty tricks, involving 'exercises' to catch radicalized (by them) peeps, that suddenly 'go live' - oopsie. So there is a reason for the suspicion.
Oh, and I suppose that segues into a conversation about the failures of the SS-detail on the Kennedy motorcade. WE know that the Kennedy assassination was an inside-job, not a lone wolf. So why is THIS attempt NOT an inside-job, seeing as it is following a 'public presidential assassination' narrative?
Why are CNN shutting that conversation down then? Is it so they can still blame Russians, or Chinese, for example?