If you remake it, you can also drop "that" before God to make room for the extra characters. When you're writing, the word "that" can often times be dropped because it's typically used superfluously.
In Texas you can buy power at a flat rate, which stays constant throughout the year, or you can go with a variable rate, which puts you at the mercy of the commodities market.
CNN can ignore anything - remember when Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation? Also, people are going to freak no matter what if the military takes over. At least if we had a SCOTUS decision in our favor, the normies would find it more palatable - at least long enough for the tribunals to start which should open their eyes completely. Instead, a greater percentage of the population will be surprised and questioning if military intervention is necessary
The Democrats wouldn't have much say in the matter, as installing a legitimate Trump administration would necessitate the removal of a large swathe of Democrats. The CNN crowd would groan, but most Normie's would have already seen the Dems refusal to heed SCOTUS and would not side with the Dems.
Simple. SCOTUS says, "Yep, there was fraud and since fraud invalidates anything, that means Biden didn't actually get enough votes to win states X, Y, Z, etc."
Do you think the Democrats would accept that?!? Hell no they wouldn't! And that's when the military could not only step in, but be seen as legitimate for doing so in the eyes of the general public.
The problem is there was no "trafficking ring." If you read the article it says:
'Throughout the operational period, officers and undercover detectives placed ads on websites and apps which are commonly sought out by suspects seeking illegal sex acts with children," read a portion of a Phoenix police statement.'
So there was no trafficking until the cops pretended to be traffickers.
These people are still sick, but they were arrested for crimes that - although they were willing to commit - they didn't actually commit because a child was never involved. It's a soft form of entrapment, yet even the article title (and I'm sure the police press release) will make it sound like they took down some big, bad organization when they actually didn't.
That's why in the 00's they changed the name of their movement to "climate change" - that way it can go up or down and they're covered.
Not a fan of Michael Savage then...
Funny how California s connected to one of the main grids and still has rolling blackouts EVERY SINGLE SUMMER, unlike Texas.
Germany did this with potassium prior to WWI.
Damnit, we're still in Minecraft.
That I could see. It would certainly explain his earlier addiction issues.
You were, which is why you have to read questions carefully. House of Reps is the correct answer for the question as stated.
The deltas were to establish and verify Q's proximity to POTUS, not for us to regard Q as Nostradamus. This is quackery.
I was thinking it's more like they have to watch the others more closely because of how corrupt they are.
The bottom of the truck's side panel has "quest" written, but I haven't been able to correlate that with any companies in the area.
I'm not sure if you want to get into writing, but if you do then one of the most helpful things will be critical feedback - both in terms of style and grammar.
"There is no other successful person in the world other than Donald Trump. A man that was..."
Try reading what you wrote aloud... I suspect you meant to write: "There is no more successful person..." because using other/other doesn't make sense. There are lots of other successful people in business.
Lastly, Donald Trump is a person, not a thing. So "A man that was..." should be "A man who was...."
Anyway, I hope this helps you in your future assignments.
I think he might have some Q knowledge the way he mentions "pedophile sex cults" in this song: https://youtu.be/w8P9K4hRbs4
A garbage truck has more usefulness to the world than Psaki. It's also more honest.
Found a link: https://youtu.be/8moGEzKfk0Y
I really wish GEOTUS has slammed the ball back in her face with, "How many cities is Qanon burning down? Oh, none? Then I'd say your priorities as a 'journalist' are misplaced."
That's kind of what I'm hoping for. Trump now has standing so he gets to be heard - in a fair court he wins. But the Dems won't accept it, which will lead to the military stepping in and arresting them, which most people will agree was necessary.
If that's the script, it's an excellent one for destroying the Democrat party.
Did Q actually say it was Lincoln? Because "No War.... Clean and swift." certainly wouldn't apply to that occasion. Also,since it established federal might over the states, I wouldn't go so far as to say it "saved" the Republic.
My working/hopeful theory is that the court cases will now play out as we thought they should. Since GEOTUS is no longer president, he absolutely has standing from the election/voter fraud.
Now, suppose the courts hear all the evidence and rule in Trump's favor? Do you think the Democrats will accept that? Hell no! They'll be making excuses for why Biden shouldn't leave and/or the court decisions were rigged... BUT HOW CAN THEY DO THAT AFTER RUBBING ALL THE PREVIOUS COURT DEFEATS IN THE PUBLIC'S FACE? Even the normies will see through that façade. But it won't matter to the Dems, and it will be up to the military to remove them - and the People will see it as the right thing to do.
This hypothesis is consistent with the previous court rulings, and Q posts regarding POTUS staying out of it as well as it coming down to the military.
"10 days.
Darnkess." This is from the same post that mentioned Flynn (#97.) So if we substitute "3 days of Hell" for Darnkess then we could have 10days * 3days = 30 days as requested by Flynn.
With stated supported hypergamy, no fault divorce, and a court system rigged against men (from false rape allegations to suing sperm donors for child support!) it makes sense to avoid relationships with women in the vast majority of cases. That doesn't even address their overinflated sense of entitlement these days (which I think has been fueled by men treating their daughters like princesses.)
For men transitioning away from unsafe physical contact with women, porn can be a helpful outlet. But of course the ultimate goal for men on this path is to be so focused on one's own ambitions and goals that a relationship is seen as an unwanted distraction.