Bill Burr said it best.
Looksrare is another one to look at that is getting very innovative and will be bigger than Open Sea on the next bull run imo.
NFTs are much more than digital art. I don't care much for the art portion of it, but it's use cases goes far deeper than that, but it is still so early to be utilized main stream yet.
It's an uncorruptable digital proof of ownership. Can be a pink slip for car that you own and not the DMV. Can be a deed to your home that you own and not the banks. Can be your medical records that you own and not your doctor.
Wow 10 years that is impressive. Keep sharing your story and helping others who are fighting their own battles.
I have certainly become more picky as I've gotten older in regards to who I want to enter a relationship with because if I enter a relationship, the eventual goal is marriage. Unfortunately, the better I've gotten with women and the more I learn about how easy many are, my pickiness has gone even higher. I now search for respect, values, and integrity above all else for relationship. I have a girlfriend now and she checks all of these boxes, but even knowing this, we still hooked up on the 2nd date. Which concerns me.
Oh boy Russian women. Just like the US it depends if they come from a major city or a small town. The woman I mentioned is from Siberia and extremely traditional, but I've met others in non-dating contexts from Moscow and they still sleep around, at least the ones I've met. They also have pretty high expectations for men. You must meet the provider role. You're definitely paying for everything, which isn't a problem itself, but she probably won't say thank you after. They're hard to read and take a lot of time to open up, which makes sense if you go back to Communist days where nobody trusted each other because they had neighbors ratting out neighbors. Like I said, cultural differences lol.
In any case, I hope we both find the woman we're looking for and I hope we both start large amazing families. Best of luck to you, brother.
I read your comment the other day and started thinking about the number of women over the relative recent years who have respected themselves enough for us to have mutual interest in each other, but able to say no to my advances on the first couple dates. That number is 3 in a period of about 5 years. And I am mildly ashamed to admit there is a large sample size.
Of those 3, one became my girlfriend who was incredible and we had an amazing time together, but I moved for work and the relationship faded after that. I'm happy for her because the man she started seeing long term after me is now her husband.
One was a great girl, but I messed it up by being too unavailable, and she moved on after the second date, which she was smart to do at that specific period of my life since I was clearly not looking for something serious in that moment.
Another was also a great girl and we went on 3 or 4 dates without anything happening. She was a very conservative Russian girl and the cultural differences were a bit too much for me for reasons I won't explain now and I kind of faded out.
There were probably other girls who were good girls, but just not interested in me or me not interested in them, but my examples are of the ones there was mutual interest. Kind of sad thinking about this and only having 3 women come to mind. But that is the world we live in today, and it's a darn shame because the women who have the self control, I just have more trust and faith in. Could we be part of the problem? Maybe, but like I said in the initial comment, I believe it is in man's nature to go for it and up to the girl to reject. After all, women are the gatekeepers of sex and men the gatekeepers of commitment.
You clearly didn't read my entire comment.
Mom, can I get a tattoo?
No, you're too young to make that kind of decision.
Mom, can I change my gender by mutilating myself and going on hormone blockers/hormone replacement?
Sure honey, you know best.
Silly goyim, why can't you just let us control you?
The demographics of border states have changed so much towards the land of tacos and beans that I do not agree with this message. I will not allow my culture to change to accommodate cheap labor, regardless if the people are legit or not.
For the record, I am living in Mexico and love Mexican culture. I just don't want my country to turn into it. And real Mexicans in Mexico laugh at these types of jokes because, well, they're true.
Just because you can survive with a substance doesn't mean it's improving your life. If you go a day or two without it, the negative feelings you feel are withdrawal symptoms. You are literally addicted, but the main stream tells you this addiction is ok, so you justify it. I'm not saying caffeine is the cause of the clots, but just a general observation.
Every main stream study shows caffeine is good for you. If you look closely, these studies are sponsored by Coca Cola or similar.
Read the book, "Caffeine Blues". We've been lied to about caffeine.
Now turn the clock back some decades, doesn't this story sound familiar?
I don't think caffeine causes blood clots, I've seen zero evidence of that and highly disagree with this claim. But to say caffeine is only good for you is simply not true and I decided to highjack this thread to spread a PSA.
Let's hope some Israeli/Sri Lankan faggot isn't the leader chosen to help form the new government. This has been the design for decades.
Biology has evolved for men to sleep with multiple women and for women to sleep with one man. Anything different goes against millions of years of evolution.
A man can spread his seed multiple times to multiple women, and historically/evolutionarily speaking, without consequence. A woman needs to be more deliberate because she has to carry the baby for 9 months and evolutionarily speaking, be the one to raise the child. Things get more interesting though, if you've ever read the book, "Sperm Wars". Women have evolved to want to get pregnant by the strong alpha male who may or may not make a poor father/provider, but will want to marry the beta male who will be faithful and a good provider. Obviously a man with a combination of these traits is ideal, but rare.
Obviously modern times have fucked up our natural biology and sociology because of birth control, abortions, family court being so biased towards women, child support, etc.
edit: because the downvoats are funny for speaking facts. Just because our biology is wired a certain way doesn't mean it's good for society. I absolutely believe in monogamy and marriage, but that requires a bit of going against male biology. You can't question that prior to civilization, the alpha male had children with multiple women. That's just the way we were wired. And still are. I haven't read the bible as in depth as I would like but I met a woman once who is as religious as they come and she told me the bible says that there are aspects of men and women that we have to consistently fight against. She told me men are naturally weak and must work to become strong and that women are naturally manipulative and must work to not be so (I can't verify this but I don't see why she would lie to me). There are certain aspects of our biology that we need to fight for the betterment of ourselves and society. But do not confuse this with the aspects of our natural biology that the liberal overlords want us to fight against that is not good for society.
Women are the gatekeepers of sex and men are the gatekeepers of commitment. Men will always push for sex, it's in our nature. It's up to the women to control themselves and reject the advances and not give it up to every man who wants it.
Inversely, women will always push for commitment with a high value man they respect, it's in their nature. It's up to men to control themselves and ensure the woman is a good long term prospect and to not commit to every woman who wants it.
Movies back in the day used to depict this accurately. A woman will push for marriage. The man will say no, he has things to do. The woman will continue pushing. The man says no, he still has things to do. Then finally he decides he's ready and she'll make a good wife and he does it. Now a days western men are such incels, if a woman asks for commitment, the pussy man will say yes because he is so excited a girl wants him. Now use this same logic for women and sex.
Women are the gatekeepers of sex and men are the gatekeepers of commitment. If women give up sex so easy without commitment, then many men will choose not to commit.
Here is an honest perspective from a man. If I go on a date with a girl, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and things turn sexual... if she gives it up so easily, I will almost always keep her in the casual box. If she gave it up so easy to me, how many other men did she give it up to so easily?
If she rejects my advances while clearly wanting to proceed, it shows she has self control. It shows she values sex more than just a physical deed. I will consider her for a long term relationship. I will gain respect for a girl who is interested in me but wants to wait. Unfortunately, this is very rare these days.
Biology isn't fair, but the science shows for women specifically that if she has had sex with more than 5 men, she is exponentially more likely to get a divorce as her count increases. Like I said, biology isn't fair that is is specific to women. Her ability to pair bond with a man has faded and she's less likely to stick with a relationship through hard times. Or she's less likely to remain faithful when another higher value man shows interest in her.
The science shows that women who can say no to sex will make better, more faithful, longer lasting wives. I highly doubt the women in this post will stick with their plan long term if they've spent all their lives doing the opposite, but it is incredibly funny that they reached this conclusion in the most round about way possible.
Let's assume android and AI tech and unlimited energy is far more along than we can comprehend and it all comes out flooding at once. It will still take decades to become common place due to price being out of reach for most people and logistical obstacles. The transition will certainly not be a fast and immediate one which could give society ample time to adapt. I mean look at the nicest cars or even the fanciest DSLR cameras. The tech is here but out of reach for most people.
Hypothetically if all this technology is proven to be true, my biggest concern comes down to land ownership and there still being a 0.01% who gets 99% of the worlds wealth and megacorporations holding all the power, sort of like in Sci-Fi movies. But if we trust the plan, we have to assume these things are being discussed and measures put into place to help with the transition. To be honest, that is probably 90% of the plan anyways.
Regardless, it is certainly an interesting thought experiment.
Most of big tech, banks, and government jobs will die, everything else will remain.
And to be honest, big tech is shit and has way too much money. Banks and wallstreet are shit and have way too much money. And government jobs are useless and has way too much money.
We will still need construction. We will still need the service industry. We will still need manufacturing. I just don't see 90% of jobs disappearing. Other than that, solid post. We certainly need to think about the aftermath of it all.
I've always questioned Elon. His mom is still getting modeling gigs at her ripe old age. Nobody is allowed to ascent without the deep states permission.
There is a reason they are demonizing proof of work using any tactic they can, the biggest one being, "proof of work is causing global warming!"
Proof of work is literally hack proof, outside of an incredibly unrealistic 51% hack. The deep state and big banks can't control it in it's current form. They can't add any more than the already existing 21,000,000. This frustrates them. This infuriates them. they have never not been in full control of a money supply.
So they'll continue saying it causes global warming. They'll continue saying it's racist. This is literally their only game plan for anything and everything they hate. It's racist and/or it causes global warming. Gotta hand it to them, they are consistent.
We need to ban pipes immediately. Common sense pipe control.
If they hold for 2 years, probably less, they'll get into profit. Are they saying only white people have the willpower for delayed gratification and ability not to sell at a loss?
Most boat people are strong conservatives regardless of location. Same thing even in the delta in the East Bay Area in California.
There has to be something going on we don't know because Trump is still bragging about how quickly he rolled them out. After bragging, he just said in Alaska, "someday we're going to have to sit down and have a little talk (about the vaccines)".