4
SergeantSlaughter 4 points ago +4 / -0

πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™

2
SergeantSlaughter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Since I'm guessing you haven't seen this I'll post it here again:

I was NOT referencing a specific drop. I was referencing an event in space and time and as you know, there are many drops which talk about this event in different ways, different spellings, etc. If I was referencing a specific drop I would include the drop #.

There's a huge argument about N Armstrong when he took his "one small step" whether he said "one small step for man" which is exactly what he said, or if he said "one small step for [a] man" which would actually make more sense. Are anons really that uptight about general speech re: Q drops? I've never known this to be the case but possibly? We're talking about the same thing here.

Would anons feel warm and fuzzy if I changed it to say "10 days [of] darkness"? or just flat out "10 days darkness"? Or would we have to go full measure and say "10 days. darkness" with a period in the middle of a sentence? Do you want it spelled "darkness" or "darnkess"? That's not how we talk when we're generalizing about an event and it would look and sound stupid if we did.

And the anon who reported me came out of hibernation to do so. Which makes me question, out of the 10,700 active GAW accounts, how many of these are bots, shills, samefags?

I joined GAW about 2 months after you did, which was nearly 5 years ago. Can you explain this to an OG anon? What are your rules regarding "misquoting" drops. I think it should be posted on the sidebar clearly, so everyone knows what they are allowed to say and what they're not. Can you do that? If not, I'll have to surmise that you're just playing favorites. Please, respectfully, prove me wrong.

2
SergeantSlaughter 2 points ago +2 / -0

And what kind of trolling do you think I'm doing? I've asked you several serious questions. Why is it OK to say "Rigging for red" when Q clearly said "RIG FOR RED" and that gets stickied but something I said out of context deserves to be deleted?

3
SergeantSlaughter 3 points ago +3 / -0

How would I know? I'm not a biologist!

2
SergeantSlaughter 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm hoping that's a one ounce silverround, and I'm hoping it will be more like a $1000 coin.

3
SergeantSlaughter 3 points ago +3 / -0

What is actually going on here. I sent multiple messages in mod mail to explain what the criteria is for "misquoting a q drop" and mods never answered

Apparently you can say "rigging for red" (Q never said this once) and it gets stickied. Q said RIG FOR RED

But if you talk about the possibility of "10 days [of] darkness" not even talking about a drop, just a possible event, it gets deleted.

Makes no sense. Make it make sense?

7
SergeantSlaughter 7 points ago +7 / -0

Did Biden autopen her nomination?

dunno but good question

is she really a justice?

dunno but good question

3
SergeantSlaughter 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is a STICKIED post right now that says "rigging for red"

Absolutely NOWHERE does Q say that phrase.

It's "RIG FOR RED" every time.

When does that post get unstickied and deleted?

4
SergeantSlaughter 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nice to know which one of you decided to redact my comments. And, it's clear you didn't read a word I wrote about it. Thank you, fren.

Read: https://greatawakening.win/p/1AR0nbylhw/x/c/4eWd2OxK7XC

You felt the NEED to remove my comments (take away my voice) because I chose to speak freely in a generalization about an event. Are you going to start deleting comments when someone says "there" instead of "their"? Serious question.

2
SergeantSlaughter 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's what I should be doing. Hauling out some old (sell-able) junk and buying more coin 😎

6
SergeantSlaughter 6 points ago +6 / -0

And that's precisely the point - I was NOT referencing a specific drop. I was referencing an event in space and time. If I was referencing a drop I would include the drop.

You know, there's a huge argument about N Armstrong when he took his "one small step" whether he said "one small step for man" which is exactly what he said, or if he said "one small step for [a] man" which would actually make more sense. Are anons really that uptight about general speech re: q drops? I've never known this to be the case but possibly? We're talking about the same thing here.

Would anons feel warm and fuzzy if I changed it to say "10 days [of] darkness"? or just flat out "10 days darkness"? Or would we have to go full measure and say "10 days. darkness" with a period in the middle of a sentence? Do you want it spelled "darkness" or "darnkess"? That's not how we talk when we're generalizing about an event.

5
SergeantSlaughter 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes. I'm really curious to know why my voice was silenced, for what seems like no reason. How was my speech so out of line that it had to be REDACTED from the site?

5
SergeantSlaughter 5 points ago +5 / -0

guessing it wasn't pleasant or productive

You can look at it, it's in the description of this post. I'm not sure was unpleasant or unproductive about what I said.

4
SergeantSlaughter 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly

The conversation is in the description now. For some reason this got posted twice and one of them did not have the conversation in the description

It was copied out of mod logs

4
SergeantSlaughter 4 points ago +4 / -0

The drops say both. Some people just get their panties in a wad over semantics and it's like really? Who tf really cares that much? That you have to get the last word in over something so stupid? Focus on the mission people

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›