Yes, someone did.

Considering that the original request for privacy was half regarding their children, and further considering that the comment I responded to said “all of it” and “his entire life should be open domain”, that is absolutely what is being asked for. His children and their lives are part of “all of it” and “his entire life”.

Now that is a good point. I’m baffled at why I hadn’t considered that.

Outside of that, and once the truth is found in that regard, it is still no ones business about his children’s lives.

Information on the private lives of his children is not your right.

You're blinded by politics.

The only things this chart likely gets right is that God is on top and us peons are on the bottom. Everything in the middle just reads like fan fiction.

I concur.

Source: Am a gamer.

There is no middle, there is no left, there is no right, and there is no spoon.

Just looked and all I see are "those darned joggers" reacting positively, among other people doing the same.

They certainly will do it in the future, and the vaxx may very well have been the test run.

I just don't think it fits the bill as the mark.

That is the claim many make. I don't know if it's true or not, I was really only pointing out that if Biden did in fact fake becoming president, he can also fake resigning.

As I said.

Not getting the vaccine did not prevent you from buying and selling, evidenced by the fact that we can still buy and sell.

It has barely a similarity to how the mark of the beast is described.

If he can pretend to be inaugurated, he can pretend to resign.

You make not caring about the quality of other people's lives sound so virtuous...

God works through people who give their will to Him to stop things like that from happening.

But if no one chose to follow God, then yes, He respects free will. This isn't some sometimes shit where He "tries" to respect free-will "when possible". God does not try anything, He simply does.

God can not impose such a limit and continue to be just and good. For numerous reasons. He said we have free will and so if He then limited us anyway, He would be a liar. God is not a liar.

It would also betray His character. He created us with free will, so our love was true, and we weren't just puppets with no true desire to follow Him. It would be contradictory to create us in such a way and then limit the very thing that makes us that way. God is not contradictory.

And how do you figure God determines between forms of evil, anyway? A perfect being would surely see all evil similarly, no? Sure, there are differences in the sense that different things are different, but in effect, a perfect and good God would not care in a moral sense. The wages for sin are the same no matter what sin you commit. Meaning, all evil is deserving of the same level of punishment.

Lying, murder, rape, etc.

The punishment is the same. Death and eternal separation from God.

Then we wouldn't have free will. It would be a lie.

"You have the freedom to choose what you will do and what actions you will take... Unless of course you do this..."

It's in the Bible without a date. And everyone since Christ ascended has been convinced they were truly the ones in the end times.

When it happens, it happens, but to be so certain it is happening NOW flies in the face of all reason and historical evidence.

We certainly aren't living in the worst time in human history since the foundation of the World. Not everywhere, at the very least.

They know full well how to use words, which is why they write propaganda for a living.

But then murder would be the appropriate word, would it not? Seeing as it allows for killing in self-defense. And sure, in a more philosophical sense, the attacker may have killed himself by attacking you, but in a literal sense, killing him in self-defense means you killed him.

Also, is meekness not exactly what the guy above described?

I certainly see where you are coming from, though, and actually quite appreciate your interpretation of the word kill as used in the King James. It's one aspect of the King James I didn't really know how to reconcile, as I consider the King James to be the best we currently have, but to me the word kill always seemed to be mistranslated. You definitely lay out a good view on how the word can fit and be accurate.

Satan most definitely hates everyone that isn't him equally.

I like how in the King James Bible it says kill instead of murder in "thou shalt not kill".

I guess the King James is watered down compared to the modern versions that say murder.

I don't have the picture, unfortunately, but can attest that I also recall seeing it go around.

It doesn't even matter if you are right or not, you sound like a Redditor all the same.

Same toxic personality, same know-it-all behavior.

No one is a good person, and only those who follow God's will in all things come close.

Luckily, following His will often means helping others.

But I do agree that in some circles I sense exactly what you describe. A cold, callous, uncaring type who would rather ignore everyone but themselves and help no one. They pay lip service to God and don't do anything He says. They don't really care.