Rights can not be taken away.
This is the thing. We are where the mentality is agreeable. The majority is with us. The problem is that tyrants can't accept people living outside their system. They will follow wherever we go. Even if we defeat them, their ilk will rise from the ashes and return with enough time, even if unconnected to the original group.
The solution for tyranny of the minority is not tyranny of the majority. 99.99% of people don't get to decide to fuck over one guy and violate his rights because they all agreed, for example.
I don't need to preface every comment I make with a big fat disclaimer stating I'm playing Devil's Advocate, or am simply attempting to open up discussion on theories, to not be a liar or fraud.
And you're making a difference where I see none. You say you're talking about people specifically insisting something is true with no proof. I'm saying that you're conflating people who do this with people who don't, but who both present their posts in a similar way.
Edit: To be clear, I don't even do this regularly if at all, but the people who do are not your punching bag.
Democracy is terrible. Tyranny of the majority. All it does is allow a tiny majority to fuck over the rest of the people with impunity.
"Don't like that 50.1% of people think you should be shot for refusing the clot shot? Too bad, come this way and face the wall".
Nobody needs to pay for that because they pull the money out of thin air.
Cut the amount we spend by 90%, delete the fed, and abolish every tax other than a nominal sales tax and there we go.
That would also be an extension of "wanting someone to take care of them when they're older" I'd think. If you're poor and can't afford good medical care, for yourself when you're old, plus your kids in their youth, you'd want kids who could take care of you personally, and enough to ensure they live to do it.
His problem is thinking that countries and/or people getting richer will improve health because now they can "afford" vaccines, and that this will decrease how many kids people have. I agree that the solution is, as you say, to bring people out of poverty. Useless injections not required.
It's assuming that people who directly argue a position believe the position, and are committed. I've presented plenty of arguments I'm not fully convinced on, without making explicitly clear I'm not a full believer in the theory/idea.
Devil's advocate has value, and pushing discussion forward does as well. One need not say this is what they're doing for that to be true.
Was thinking the same as you at first, but if it's really a bot it obviously can't pay 8 dollars to be verified. And if the rule is that you can't impersonate or make parody accounts without being listed as such, I'd think describing your account as "The Official Account of Tesla AI Bot" and making your handle @TeslaAIBot would get you banned if found out.
God's mind is not shallow. I will follow that over my or your shallow mind any day.
The people in control aren't clowns, but they made the world into a "clown world" to make it easier to destroy.
But I generally agree with what you say here. The people we're fighting against are very, very evil, and very competent at executing that evil. Not clowns themselves by any means.
Plenty of people are perfectly capable of sitting comfortably at "it might be so" until further evidence is provided.
Maybe don't talk like you know people you know nothing about. Kinda ironic, in fact.
He didn't ask for proof, just evidence. There's plenty of evidence for 9/11 being the government, and plenty of logical explanation to back up the idea with. The only evidence isn't hard "proof". This is the lie of modern science. Is there ANY type of proof for project blue beam outside of what the other guy said?
To be clear, I don't know a lot about the topic and don't have my mind made up either way, just pointing out that there are levels and types of evidence between "some guy said it" and "concrete, undeniable proof". It doesn't have to be 2 to convince people who aren't convinced by 1.
Take my elected representative, please!
I was banned twice under Musk for simply talking about trannies.
Edit: Not banned, to be clear, but my account was locked until I deleted my Tweets that hurt the trannies fee fee's.
If the aliens come and preach the Truth of the Lord, I will consider listening to them. Otherwise, they can get bent.
Mother Of All Short Squeezes
Can confirm, MOASS was yesterday. I was there. Saw it with my own ears.
I explained it poorly.
His position is that higher child mortality leads people to have more kids, so they have a higher chance of some of them living to take care of them in their elderly years.
The idea is that vaccinated kids die less often in their youth, and that vaccines prevent illness in general. So if they are "healthier" (poisoned) due to getting a vaccine they have a better chance of, as he says, living to take care of their parents in their elderly years if they need assistance.
It's a silly reason to think people choose how many kids to have based on their potential to take care of them when they’re old, but this is his position. What he hasn't done from what I have seen is admit that vaccines are for depopulation.
Agree with most everything you've said.
One thing I would say is that laughter is a coping mechanism for some to deal with dark or tragic shit. It's certainly possible, though maybe unlikely, that they were both responding like this, or that one of them one and the other was following suit.
Though they should also try and push their feelings aside and remain professional seeing as they're broadcasting themselves to the world talking about this stuff. And give it the seriousness it deserves.
I mainly mean military sending every last cabal member off to gitmo to be executed. The big one where the plan is manifest and brought to completion.
People are certainly waking up though, I agree.
Agreed. Just illustrating to the other guy that public events aren't all there is. Trump could have been planning all this time to return to Twitter some time in 2023. Just like the military has their plans, which include Trump, and which have planning and set-up aspects before they can make obvious moves.
It's been a while, but if I recall his argument is something along the lines of "if parents know their kids won't die to disease they'll have less, since they know the ones they do have will be alive to take care of them when they're old and frail."
As if people are basing their choice for how many kids to have solely on getting taken care of when they're old. It's all a bunch of junk, and we know the real reason he pushes vaccines, but I don't see that he's directly admitted that the reason is depopulation.
Military hasn't done anything public yet, either. The habbening has habbened yet. Plenty of things Q said would happen still haven't happened yet.
Doesn't mean they won't.
Oof
Just looked at the edit history and can see why as well KEK
Think we're at 5 now. Not sure either.