Laughing at your own abuse is nowhere near as bad as actually abusing children.
If anyone is a witch, it's this guy.
He claims better health leads to people having less kids. So if more vaccines produce "better health" people will choose to have fewer kids. It's not admitting (openly and directly) that vaccines kill people and are being used for depopulation.
Assuming I'm thinking of the correct thing, bringing up this statement isn't the silver bullet against Gates people want it to be.
That is undoubtedly not a literal statement.
Trust me, I'm aware. I'm far from tech illiterate. And to be clear, I don't know much about crypto either. However, I believe I have decent intuition. And my intuition tells me that the other guy doesn't really know anything about the tech. My intuition also tells me that, other than crypto as you agreed, you do have a good idea of what you're talking about on these kinds of things (and may be correct regarding crypto as well).
However, this is also kind of giving off vibes similar to a scientist claiming they know what they're talking about on climate change, because they have a degree in/are an expert/knowledgeable in biochemistry.
Regardless, I certainly agree that a secure computer isn't possible in the current environment.
And to be clear, while I maybe could have worded it better, my original point was solely what it says. That I don't think the guy is very knowledgeable on the subject. He may very well be correct, I didn't intend to make a claim on that, but regardless I would wager it's from a place closer to ignorance and rejection of the new/of technology than knowledge or understanding of the tech.
Yep, as long as you're not buying children or some other shit like that, the government should fuck off.
Based and capitalist-pilled.
This.
These kinds of responses feel like nothing more than a simple "no u" to the crazy people who make the "gas cars are worth nothing, absolutely terrible, and should be banned while electric cars are perfect!" types of claims. An inversely extreme response to an extreme position.
Of course neither are accurate as you point out.
Sounds no different than Windows lol
I'm aware and don't even necessarily support digital currency. Gold and silver is better the way I see it.
But my statement was accurate. The guy clearly doesn't know about what he's railing against, and I'd lean towards you not being much of a crypto expert either.
It's ok if you don't know how the tech works, but maybe don't go around acting like you do lol
I'm sure Elon would be happy to oblige KEK
The authority on false advertising should be a court of law on a case per case basis. Not some group who aren't accountable to the people they're supposedly "protecting" who can make up whatever they want.
Yea, that's a more apt term. Eluded me when writing my comment, was thinking between shill or glowie.
They certainly won't let that stop them.
Just looked after seeing the claim in another thread, and they hit it up with every fact check and deboonking they could.
The problem with "oh he just likes the message it doesn't mean anything!" is "This is not another 4-year election".
How blind do you have to be to not see that him retruthing that almost assuredly means something lol
I remember some guy who was mega-based and always appeared to fit perfectly, no glow, coming out after Jan 6 with the "REEEEE I WAS ONLY PRETENDING BUT I CANT DO IT ANYMORE REEEEEE UR ALL A BUNCH OF TERRORISTS!!!!!!!"
That guy was a top commenter who frequently appeared to have something of value to say. Some of these shills are extremely advanced.
Sunday Gunday was based.
Just looked, and they've deboonked the shit out of that claim.
It's probably true, but good lucking getting them to admit it rather than just letting Camel Toe be president anyway.
I pretty much glossed over the name when reading this at first and based on how it read assumed it was Cates lol
If and when 'the habbening' occurs, I have a feeling whatever bullshit would protect him that applies right now, will become null and void.
Almost like they got tired of winning, because they didn't know they were winning, and instead perceived wins as losses.
Trump right again!
Yep, can't even get one video where people can say "look, he's perfectly capable of basic reading skills, he only has gaffes sometimes". It's so incessant that it's actually hard to find clips of him not fucking up.
Whoever these morons are that insist Biden is perfectly fine, they must not watch him very often lol.
At the bottom of the article it clarifies that, in actuality, the president can pretty much do whatever they want, and the USSS will simply have to adapt to protect him in that situation. Things might be strongly discouraged, but aren't technically disallowed as the Secret Service work for him.
As pointed out, you're wrong: https://qalerts.app/?q=%2388+
can't believe how many people still get this wrong smh my head