Right, they've been playing the "both too old" nonsense for months now.
If the smallest coin can't buy you certain things, it might just be time to mint a smaller coin.
The only thing they knew about Vance a week ago was that "their side" hates him. Now the only thing they know about Vance is that "their side" really hates him.
Poor East Russia being subjugated and oppressed by the evil pootin in West Russia :(
I'm sure the Eastern Russians would be totally on board with this guy and with the radical left lunatics he represents.
#FreedomForEastRussia :(
This is the second time I've seen one of these idiots imply that people are whining about 2a in response to this.
I've seen precisely zero people call for gun control in response to this (especially the lefties). These people are so fucking dumb. They literally invent nonsense in their head, and I 100% think they actually believe their own delusion.
Dude, not all women are alike, just as not all men are alike
This can be true, and it can also be true that men and women are inherently different. For example, every trained woman is weaker than any trained man (assuming same levels of training, effort, desire to improve, etc.)
and you'd not want to be in my claws if you hurt one of my children.
Sounds great until the dude hurting your children is a 6'4 muscled beast who you couldn't possibly touch.
and many times those feelings are based on what is best for their families, children, nation, and future.. TY
Emotions can't be used to make decisions. Not primarily, at least. They are a secondary determiner at most. Good decisions are made based on logic, reason, and doing what is right... not how you personally feel in a given scenario.
I suppose there may be some scenarios where an emotional approach is preferred. This is the maybe the reason men use more logical thinking and women use more emotional thinking. We are meant for different things and complement each other. The decisions men make shouldn't be made by women, and the decisions women make shouldn't be made by men. We simply wouldn't get it because we are inherently different.
Ultimately, the stats very clearly show that women are almost all-in on the woke agenda. You are an extreme exception, and while that's a good thing, it's also good and ok to point out the difference there. Women are clearly deeply and inherently different from men in how they are voting.
Also, if I were to be a little spicy here, I'd point out that this entire response is pretty liberal in nature. Certainly by any standard outside of "conserving what liberals were doing 20 years ago".
Imagine you've spent your whole life deep in the mainstream accepted narratives. You'd start to believe them too.
When someone like Trump comes around and threatens that, people lash out emotionally. Yes, even politicians or high level businesspeople. But then, some of them come out of the stupor they had been in and realize that it is possible for an alternative to the bullshit to exist.
This is the difference between those who flip and those who stay with the cabal. The ones who flip are able to see outside the system, the box, that they placed themselves in for so long, and when the time comes are able to say that they prefer the alternative.
Right, the good times created the problem, by creating the weak men you mention who created the hard times.
The only problem I see, is that the women in that mode are confused and deluded by that way of thinking. They will never actually get it, because they still aren't men. If women could truly learn to think and behave just like men, that would prove correct the people who say we aren't different and that it's just learned behavior.
So I just don't see how imposing this shit upon women will do anything but make them even more masculine than they already are. That doesn't solve the problem, it only satisfies a desire for revenge. A desire to break them as a punishment for acting a certain way.
That's all we'll achieve by doing this. They won't get it, because they aren't men, and the approach you're suggesting is a male approach. They'll just end up more broken, more confused, and ultimately destroyed. That doesn't help us fix the world, nor does it improve the soul/spirit of the women you'd do it to.
I suppose I also disagree that women necessarily "perpetuate" anything. Men are responsible for leading. When men don't do this because they're too busy, as a common example, watching porn or playing video games, the natural result is what we now have: chaos and disaster. How is that the fault of women, when they're simply operating in the world that we as men have created and given to them?
His point has nothing to do with which way the state leans, but with who controls its government. That would be the fraudsters, and as such his point is 100% valid.
He worded it poorly at worst.
While not technically a left leaning state, it's certainly controlled by the left due to fraud, which makes his point spot on.
(Not that there's anything wrong with him smoking some weed)
There is
On the one hand, this is why we're fucked; women voting based on shit like this.
On the other hand, we need all the help we can get.
Yes, but paranoia is just about the only argument here. It simply can't be what it seems, right? Yea, yea, I hear you: "how are we supposed to find the evidence if we don't look?". Certainly not by posting the unfounded theories in random threads.
And it's not like there isn't plenty of material surrounding the Secret Service's role in allowing this to happen, which is itself a textbook conspiracy.
The conspiracy is that the Secret Service allowed this to happen on purpose.
Anything else is fantasy right now.
The brainwashed's anger is for you and me, and they'll kill us just the same.
I can watch plenty of violent shit in movies and video games, but real life stuff gives me the same reaction you had. Can't even bear to look.
That which is seen can never be unseen.
And that kind of shit does nothing but corrupt the soul. There are plenty of ways to build mental fortitude without seeking out violent gore or truly evil shit of that sort. People have been doing it for thousands of years, and we aren't stronger than them.
If this were true, we'd be able to eat vegetarian diets and be healthy, and God would have told us to do so.
Destroying women's psyches isn't going to make society better, only worse.
Trauma makes women more masculine. They should be protected from such things.
And you're treating the female mind like the male mind. They aren't the same. We aren't the same. If you try to get through to a woman the way you would to a man, you won't get very far. Or you'll end up with a confused tranny.
The only reason the "boss babe" shit exists is because of men allowing it to. Women didn't just wake up one day and decide this is their future. Weak men create hard times, not weak women.
Exactly. Trump being insulated doesn't make him immortal. Men aren't perfect and even with security and protection any of their numerous assassination attempts could have succeeded.
The notion that the "good guys" allowed a bullet to be shot at Trump's head, or anyone's head, is fucking absurd. This would make them categorically "not the good guys".
The ends don't justify the means, and shooting into a crowd trying to hit some random in the ear (impossible shot) is not a justified mean to an end. It's evil, and grossly negligent.
And then proceeded to state his disagreement with the states going for full bans. Supports exceptions, and he's against a federal ban, which is a rejection of personhood for unborn babies. If unborn babies are people, killing them is already murder.
And we can't get around the fact that he hugged the pride flag. He's simply not a staunch opponent of anything other than the brainwashing children aspect of the gay shit. Hence: liberal.
So as I said; not a left wing radical, but a big lib nonetheless.
Though, he gets full credit for killing Roe vs. Wade. That crime against law being shot down is the first step.
Surely it could just be that they assumed it was SS on the roof and since they couldn't see just did nothing? A couple local officers who simply had to show up because their superior told them to likely wouldn't know anything outside of "stand here and keep watch". They have their job and the SS have theirs, and the local officers don't need to know much about the latter.
Hard to find the line between incompetence and malice, but this seems perfectly plausible to me based on what the guy in the above video said.
I'd say it's more likely that none of those agents knew anything and that they did exactly what they were trained to do. There's simply no reason to inform the agents who don't need to know of a plan to allow the assassination of their own protectee. If they have no active role in such a plan, they don't need to do anything other than their normal job. It makes it more believable anyway when they're scrambling around wondering how such a thing could happen.
All that would need to be done is for some higher ups to botch the security plan. Every agent simply does their job, maybe you involve the sniper team, but ultimately it's the lack of agents on that rooftop that allows the plan to work. And if the shooter knew the plan, it allows him to work around the agents that are there.
I increasingly find this to be the case.
Mass executing people for being "dumb" is patently evil and can't be done, but these people aren't just a mere annoyance, they're an active detriment to everyone's lives, including their own.
It's a hard problem, I don't know the solution, and again a mass culling is out of the question, but I don't see how the vast majority of NPCs are magically going to become functioning humans as opposed to just being NPCs but with new programming.