I disagree on the analogy, as it would be true if we were talking about two sides of a flawed perspective of human wisdom, but the Bible doesn't claim to be that. It claims to be the word of God to man through divinely inspired human writings.
I implore you to study other religions, what they actually say. They do not point people to Jesus in the slightest. Talmudic Judaism depicts Jesus as a sorcerer who is boiling in hot excrement. Islam rejects Jesus as savior and has many contradicting instructions to the Bible including verses in the Qur'an today Muhammed described as satanic verses. Muhammad claims to be given the Qur'an by an angel of light, who disguises himself as an angel of light?
Someday look at the similarities between Islam and Mormonism, which itself was born out of freemasonry! The devil is not creative, he continues to use the same lie across cultures.
All other religions are born out of the same lie that the serpent told Eve in the garden, "Eat of this fruit and you will not die; you will be like God." They focus on a series of rules to worldly ascension and following a list of rules that focuses on man, instead of focusing on God. Christianity is the only belief system that focuses on God's reconciliation and love for us. It either comes from God and is of the utmost importance, or it is a lie not worth considering.
You have been misled by leftist and even "right wing" talking heads, or perhaps by individuals who listened to them.
The 1st amendment prevents the establishment of a particular state religion to protect both the practitioners (forced compliance) and belief system from government influence over doctrine. It does not prevent teaching general Christian ethics rather than the utilitarian and postmodernist moral relativism we have now. Christian ethics including Bible study were taught in public schools!
Consider Mr. Fisher Ames of Massachusetts, who provided the wording for the First Amendment passed by the House of Representatives. He would certainly know the intent of that amendment, yet he never used the phrase "separation of church and state." Rather, he called for the Bible always to remain the primary textbook in America's classroom: "Why... should not the Bible regain the place it once held as a school book? Its morals are pure, its examples captivating and noble. The reverence for the sacred book that is thus early impressed lasts long; and, probably, if not impressed in infancy, never takes firm hold of the mind."
OP why do you use the term "person of color" ? This term is divisive in of itself and really just a rebranding of "colored people." Except now it is used to other white people.
I agree with the phrase "we are all one race" and it's worth pursuing unity over time with those who will accept the culture in the country. I don't go to Japan and ask them to change.
Most immigrants I have met from Africa are hard working, intelligent folks. While people who grew up in the hood/slums tend to have a degenerate culture, regardless of skin color, that is furthered by fatherlessness. We have a huge cultural divide that has long been caused by Dem policies and ignoring it as something that can be immediately unified within a generation is also a problem. As much as we want them to change.
I also will not apologize for believing that some cultures and beliefs have more merit. Christianity in particular is a set of beliefs about the world, which I believe are true. They are also incompatible with Islam, humanism, Hinduism, Buddhism, non Jesus accepting Judaism, freemasonry, gnosticism, etc because they hold conflicting claims to truth. Either one is true or none of them are. Since I am a Christian, I believe our country should return to its foundation of all people are welcome if they accept the culture, and only Christian ethics should be taught. Moral relativism and postmodernism are the reasons we are in the mess we are in as a culture.
Gettr sucks. It does not allow criticizing religions. If we cannot criticize islam we will continue to have a big problem.
It's right there in the TOS. Gab and Truth Social are actual free speech.
He clearly does not say "cure"
Family member knows someone in this hospital. Confirmed that they died with omicron rather than from it. Main cause of death was myocarditis from a previous covid infection, sucks.
OP is as bad as fact checkers. He clearly says "kill children" and though he probably meant to say something else, he didn't.
Yeah I am going to order vitamin D tests for myself and family to try to figure out correct dosing. 4000 IU daily seems consistently tolerable to most people. Higher dosing when you get covid.
It doesn't last in your system too long either.
We HAD lockdowns here. Thousands of small businesses had to let people go or close permanently. People cannot and could not see their family members or friends in hospitals or care homes. Serious question, have you been in a coma for 2 years? Or are you that detached from reality?
People can make their own decisions and decide if they are at risk. Unless you think everyone is literally TOO STUPID to do so?
Don't be a reality denying cultist. Go spread your lies somewhere else.
If he wasn't on vitamin D3 that might be the reason...but he may also have previously undiagnosed complications. Covid also just seems to impact people of higher ages for some reason.
People theorized early on this may be due to whether or not someone has the MMR vaccine.
Are you serious? "No practical strategy to implement" Yeah we have nooooo idea how to continue on life normally without forced lockdowns! /s
Epidemiologist authors at Harvard, Oxford, and Stanford also have noooo clue what they are talking about. /s
Begone shill!
Do you have a link?
I can't find what you're talking about.
It is still likely safer than other options if it comes down to it.
Some of the best and most impactful Project Veritas videos are from this year...their journalism hasn't slowed down much by O'Keefe writing a book.
Novavax still uses the spike protein and is funded by Bill Gates + WEF (I was very surprised)
https://greatawakening.win/p/140vQsYiHK/things-to-beware-of-with-novavax/c/
Spread this. This is important to help normies understand.
I'm inclined to agree at this point even though so many people in the industry deny it.
I generally agree with you. People here take note that you cannot trust everything Trump says. You have to pray and make your own decisions right now.
We'll have to see how it all plays out in the end.
You know sometimes I think that and other times I feel innocent children shouldn't be used to prove a point if he knows better.
In particular the children of the people who support America and believe what he says.
I don't like it either. I personally believe in speaking the truth consistently and letting the chips fall where they may.
I'm just saying if the goal really is a Great Awakening & Where We Go One We Go All, then that includes Democrats and people with severe TDS.
On the other, other hand you can say it's all BS and a politically oriented play to appeal to the people on the fence in midterms.
Regardless of what people say on here, the vast majority of people, including Republicans, do not believe the vaccine is significantly dangerous. They have yet to figure out how problematic it is, so the politically popular thing is to be in favor of it.
I understand and definitely do not believe Trump does everything correctly or has all the right takes on an issue (none of us do).
But once Trump steps outside of the medical orthodoxy opinion, he again becomes the strawman enemy or 1984 Goldstein if you will that he's been for the past 5-6 years. It becomes a "Trumper" opinion that folks under severe TDS brainwashing will never accept.
Just a thought. Regardless, my trust is not in Trump to solve the issues in our country. We the People have to step up.
We the People are the cure to spread truth, not any politician. I believe this is to show it's not about dogma or authority; it's about what's true.
To present the other side, what would it look like if Trump cast doubt on the vaccine? I think this is a hard question to answer but it might make it seem partisan like many other issues people are divided on. This would drag out the issue a lot longer and divide our country more instead of unifying us around a common issue. Instead, the common person who sees adverse effects and the product not working, starts to understand BOTH sides are wrong, human leaders are flawed, postmodern scientism, and there is a need to turn back to God instead because no one else is coming to save you. This play is to push us TOWARD unity when the crimes are uncovered and knowledge is spread.
I am not certain about this but it does stick out in my mind.
I'm not arguing against Genesis, John, and Exodus.
Jesus is YHWH as part of the Trinity. He many times in all 4 gospels claims to have attributes and authority given to God alone. He does not correct the disciples or others when they worship Him. You bear the burden of proof in claiming that Jesus did not mean these things because that is what the plain reading of the scripture as a whole says.
Further, when you look at Genesis and other parts of the Old Testament you will see God refer to Himself as "Us"
Genesis 1:26: “God said, ‘Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.’” Genesis 3:22: “The Lord God said, ‘Behold, the man has become like one of Us, to know good and evil. And now, lest he put out his hand and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live forever.’” Genesis 11:7: “‘Come, let Us go down and there confuse their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech.’” Isaiah 6:8: “I heard the voice of the Lord, saying: ‘Whom shall I send, and who will go for Us?’ Then I said, ‘Here am I. Send me.’”
What does Isaiah say about Messiah? That He was there at the beginning. “‘Come near to Me, hear this: I have not spoken in secret from the beginning; from the time that it was, I was there. And now the Lord GOD and His Spirit Have sent Me’” (Isa. 48:16)
How does Hagar respond to the Angel of the LORD? 10 The angel of the Lord also said to her, “I will surely multiply your offspring so that they cannot be numbered for multitude.” 11 And the angel of the Lord said to her,
“Behold, you are pregnant and shall bear a son. You shall call his name Ishmael,3 because the Lord has listened to your affliction.
12 He shall be a wild donkey of a man, his hand against everyone and everyone’s hand against him, and he shall dwell jover against all his kinsmen.”
13 So she called the name of the Lord who spoke to her, “You are a God of seeing,”4 for she said, “Truly here I have seen him who looks after me.”
There are many more examples. Do not be deceived by masonic influenced Unitarians and the Pope who wish to push for a one world religion that rejects Jesus as Lord. For they are anti-Christs.
This guy was super pedo creepy but as far as we know so far he didn't rape anyone yet. Envolve is often wrong.
Freedom of religion allows for all religions to be practiced by the people, not to be taught equally by the government as ethically/morally correct. Imagine having to be spend equal time on satanist or molech ethics...
Yes, the state as part of public schools will have to spend some time determining what constitutes "general Christian ethics" or at least ethics in alignment with Christian beliefs but you can't replace ethics with nothing! A school without some kind ethics at all is anarchy and leads to the morally bankrupt society we have now where cheating is fine, lying is fine, what you "feel" is true is fine, and so on because there is no backing "why" for the students on why they should follow these things.
Secularists (I expect driven by the cabal) have argued this conflation and taken advantage of the confusion to take God out of the equation. When you do that, you are obscuring the truth, and it impacts all other parts of education.
I'm actually not opposed to large religions or religious books being taught in school but they should not be given equal weight to ethics. We should hold firm to Christian ethics because we legitimately believe they result in the best outcomes for human living.