0
ThisIsNotMyName 0 points ago +0 / -0

Check out the election laws in your state. You might be able to write him in. That's probably the easiest thing to do.

2
ThisIsNotMyName 2 points ago +2 / -0

GAW: "Remember, Q said to question everything!"

Me: Asks questions about Q issues that confuse me.

GAW: "Shill!"

1
ThisIsNotMyName 1 point ago +1 / -0

And so far, neither one of them have spent any time in prison.

Bannon was sentenced way back in early summer of 2022, and he's still free, waiting for his appeal. It's doubtful he'll ever spend any time in jail.

I doubt Navarro will ever set foot in prison, either.

Look at all the congressional subpoenas that were ignored during the impeachments, and you'll see that they're not taken all that seriously.

5
ThisIsNotMyName 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah, he has said "tippy top" for decades. I think someone put a video up on YouTube showing him saying it over the years. I'll see if I can find it.

Edited to add: What's up with the downvoting? Do you think I'm lying, or are you upset because it casts doubt on Trump being Q+ and giving shout outs?

Because Trump has consistently given Q and Anons shout outs. Him having a history of saying "tippy top" doesn't negate all that.

3
ThisIsNotMyName 3 points ago +3 / -0

That, and the word "treason" has been made virtually meaningless now, because people call anything they don't like "treason".

1
ThisIsNotMyName 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for the links. I've been looking through stuff about it on my own, and from what I'm reading, it's a bit more complicated than americanbar.org makes it seem.

I don't think it's quite as easy as just signing another EO. Many obstacles would have to be legally dealt with. And since Congress is glacially slow, it would most likely take years to get it resolved.

What would be the point, anyway? The next President would just sign another EO to reinstate it. In the end, it would just be a huge waste of time and money.

2
ThisIsNotMyName 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ok, I don't get how people can simultaneously believe that

  1. The 2020 election was stolen from Trump AND
  2. The 2020 election was always part of the plan and Trump allowed Biden to be elected.

Someone please explain how these two things can coexist. Because I see this all the time here and it makes zero sense to me.

2
ThisIsNotMyName 2 points ago +2 / -0

No one gives a shit if a congressional subpoena is ignored.

Remember when Trump was being impeached how many congressional subpoenas he and other Republicans ignored? They didn't get in trouble, either.

A congressional subpoena is the government's version of your mom using your entire name when she's angry at you. Like "Donald Jay Trump, you get yourself over here right now!"

No one in power cares if they're ignored.

1
ThisIsNotMyName 1 point ago +1 / -0

Says who? Where can I see anything legal or official that says that?

1
ThisIsNotMyName 1 point ago +1 / -0

Evidence we're under Martial Law?

And who exactly declared Martial Law? As I said above, it can only be done by the President, Congress, or Governors (only for their own state).

I'm going to assume you'll say Trump declared it. Ok, so what evidence do you have of that? Where are the records for it? Or did he just wave his magic wand?

3
ThisIsNotMyName 3 points ago +3 / -0

How do you know the military is coordinating it behind the scenes?

I thought all the bad guys were supposed to get caught all at once. That's the reason I keep seeing be given for why it's taking so long for something to be done So bad guys getting randomly arrested here and there doesn't fit that scenario.

1
ThisIsNotMyName 1 point ago +1 / -0

It seemed like you were justifying what they did, because the left does it as well.

1
ThisIsNotMyName 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Impeachment thing is just ridiculous. There's no way the Democrat led Senate will vote for his removal.

All this is just a waste of time, money, and resources. There's too much important stuff that needs to be done for them to be wasting their time on this stuff.

And everyone knows that the only reason for this is because the Democrats impeached Trump and this is retaliation. And it looks petty to the normies who are sitting on the political fence right now, trying to decide who to vote for.

But that's just my opinion.

5
ThisIsNotMyName 5 points ago +5 / -0

Exactly how is Trump going to get rid of the FBI, legally?

Edited to add: what's with the downvoting?

Isn't one reason why the Great Awakening is taking so long is because it has to be done legally? That's what I've seen said here time and time again. For years.

But now people have a problem with things having to be done legally?

Or did I just pop some copium balloons?

2
ThisIsNotMyName 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't understand why the bad guys have to be bagged all at once.

And can that even be done, with new bad guys popping up all the time?

And while we're waiting to get all the bad guys at once, the bad guys have had years to continue preying on innocents and children.

Can you imagine being one of those children, wondering why no one was helping you, spending years being sold for sex, and then being told that it took that long because, for some mysterious reason, all the bad guys had to be caught at the same time?

2
ThisIsNotMyName 2 points ago +2 / -0

The military doesn't have jurisdiction over civilians, though.

The only way for civilians to be tried by the military is if we were under Martial Law.

The military can't just declare Martial Law. It's declared either by individual governors for their own states or via the President or Congress.

Since Biden is formally recognized as President, I doubt there is any chance of him doing it.

Congress is split, with the Republicans controlling the House and the Democrats controlling the Senate. I don't see much chance of it happening with them.

Now, individual states could do it for their state only. But only the most based Governors would declare Martial Law, so that rules out all of the blue states and the red states with RINOs. The States with the most based Governors probably aren't ones where there is a huge population of DS or pedos or whoever else needs to be prosecuted.

This is the issue I've been trying to work through on the "Military is the only way" stance.

I just don't see how that will happen.

3
ThisIsNotMyName 3 points ago +3 / -0

An ectopic pregnancy is one where the fetus is growing somewhere other than inside the womb.

So if it was inside the abdomen, that counts as an ectopic pregnancy.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›