1
TomPaineSentMe 1 point ago +2 / -1

You should also be aware this woman doesn't know what she is talking about. She has been saying for a while that the covid vaccines didn't have clinical trials.

Listent what Trump says in April 2020

Go to 0:05:55 of this video

Through the FDA's Coronavirus Treatment Acceleration Program, 19 therapies and treatments are now being tested and 26 more are in the active planning or [for] clinical trial. So we have 19 therapies being tested currently, and 26 more are in the active planning for clinical trials. That's a big statement. That's a lot.

Trump White House Fact Sheet

https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/president-trump-leading-generation-effort-ensure-americans-access-covid-19-vaccine/

The President is using all available means to ensure safe vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics are developed, manufactured, and distributed in unprecedented time and scale in response to COVID-19. .. There has been promising early data from clinical trials and manufacturing is ramping up as candidates go through late-stage trials.

..

A number of vaccine candidates have shown promising early clinical results and are either in or starting Phase 3 clinical trials, including AstraZeneca, Moderna, and Pfizer. Several vaccine candidates are using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) clinical trial network to help enroll individuals into the clinical trials.

When Trump got Covid, he was given treatments in clinical trials or got

Though no drug has been FDA approved to treat the virus, a handful have shown positive results in clinical trials. The president has been given drugs that are being tested in clinical trials and aren't available to the general public .. Remdesivir — President Trump was given his first dose of remdesivir Oct. 2, and he will be given a five-day course, Remdesivir, was granted emergency use authorization by the FDA on May 1 after a study showed it caused a 31 percent faster recovery time compared to a placebo.

..

the White House released a letter saying the president received a single 8-gram dose of Regeneron's monoclonal antibody cocktail, called REGN-COV2, the highest dose of the drug being tested in late-stage clinical trials

Remdesivir Clinical Trial Info https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2007764 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2116846

Regeneron REGN-COV2 Clinical Trial Info https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2108163

This type of monoclonal antibody was taken off the market because ongoing clinical testing found they were not effective against Covid variants. https://www.webmd.com/covid/news/20221204/covid-19-monoclonal-antibody-treatments-no-longer-effective

4
TomPaineSentMe 4 points ago +4 / -0

Those are not sealed Indictments. They are sealed court proceedings. Outsiders using the PACER system to count court records can't distinguish an Indictment from any other type of sealed document. You would not only would need inside access, you will need this insider access for each one of the 93 federal court districts. If PACER indicated a particular sealed filing was a sealed indictment that would be giving away too much info. This was explained years ago.

Lots of court cases have documents that are sealed. Misdemeanor drug crimes, cases involving juvenile defendants, cases of a cooperating witness might remain sealed.

See for youself Here's the court Docket for Trump's case in FL. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67490070/united-states-v-trump/

Go there and search on the page for sealed.

There's 5 or 6 sealed items just in this one case.

There's going to be an upcoming hearing in this case where everything is sealed. The transcript and any documents/evidence presented will all be sealed.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/17/politics/cannon-classified-evidence-trump-hearing/index.html

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/08/17/trump-documents-case-judge-sets-hearing-on-protective-order.html

Trump judge sets sealed hearing for special counsel's security request in documents case

Indictments are usually unsealed within days.

NYC: Trump was indicted by the Grand Jury on March 30. His lawyers confirmed this the next day. The indictment was unsealed on April 4th

FL: Grand Jury returned an indictment of Trump and Nauta on June 8. Trump confirmed that night. Indictment was unsealed on June 9th.

FL: July 27 a Superseding indictment was filed against Trump, Nauta and De Olivera. Indictment was released that night. If this was sealed, it was only sealed for hours.

DC: Grand Jury returned an indictment on Aug 1st. Indictment was released that night. If this was sealed, it was only sealed for hours.

GA: Grand Jury returned an indictment against 19 individuals on Aug 1st. Indictment was released that night. Since this was televised, we know this was never sealed.

0
TomPaineSentMe 0 points ago +2 / -2

Trump did not move his operation out of Trump Tower in 2016. This is just false

The Trump transition team met with people in Trump Tower right through January,

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/photos-from-nycs-trump-tower-the-epicenter-of-a-presidential-transition/2016/11/16/fadbf250-ac38-11e6-977a-1030f822fc35_gallery.html

They also had an office in DC because public money was not supposed to go to Donald Trump's business.

Mike Flynn, hope Hicks, Mike Pence, and many others on the Trump transition team or photographed at Trump Tower all throughout December and January.

https://twitter.com/Mike_Pence/status/803268787227267072?t=7AWxc4OjABXOfosHNomT_g&s=19

https://twitter.com/Mike_Pence/status/805823083697283079?t=u3kfVbReoygVsSB0kNANMg&s=19 https://twitter.com/Mike_Pence/status/816294638369771520?t=xRWu92eE5NE-3AqkbWlvag&s=19

Cspan had a Trump Tower lobby camera set to cover the transition.

Do a search for

C-SPAN Trump Tower lobby camera 2016 2017

1
TomPaineSentMe 1 point ago +2 / -1

Even before Admiral Rogers testified under oath the wiretape story fell apart because there was no evidence. So then Sean Spicer claimed the NSA asked the Brits to do it. This was false.

Did you ever request that your counterparts in GCHQ should wiretap Mr. Trump on behalf of President Obama?

ROGERS: No sir, nor would I, that would be expressly against the construct of the Five Eyes agreement that's been in place for decades.

...

Have you seen any evidence that anyone else in the Obama administration made such a request?

ROGERS: No sir, and again, my view is the same as Director Comey, I've seen nothing on the NSA side that we engaged in any such activity, nor that anyone ever asked us to engage in such activity.

..

And if you were to ask the British to spy on America, that would be a violation of U.S. law, would it not?

ROGERS: Yes, sir.

-3
TomPaineSentMe -3 points ago +3 / -6

Admiral Rogers denied Trump Tower was ever wiretapped.

Devin Nunes denied Trump Tower was ever wiretapped. He says it quite clearly here.

https://youtu.be/_e9TBD_2tik?feature=shared

Nunes had been running around claiming there was a wiretap.

But there wasn't so he had to walk it back. Rogers never made this claim.

Rogers testified to this alongside Clapper and Comey

https://youtu.be/rIQl2gP-i98?feature=shared

One thing that came in the testimony is Obama or any other President can't simple order a wiretap. It has to go through a judge.

Nunes's claim originated with Ezra Cohen Watnik. He saw Trump's name in classified info and told Nunes about it. But he misled Nunes, either deliberately or unwittingly. The classified documents that mentioned Trump DID NOT come from any surveillance on Trump on Russians who were discussing Trump.

2
TomPaineSentMe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Two FBI agents were serving a subpoena on him. He wouldn't take it. They threw it in his apartment as he closed the door.

He came running down the stairs at them, screaming and knocked one FBI agent backwards

He backed off when the other agent showed his holstered gun.

All the folks who got out got a lawyer and negotiated bond before turning themselves in. He didn't get a lawyer.

He'll probably be out Monday as he just raised a bunch of money.

2
TomPaineSentMe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do you think might have been denied bail because he was arrested in Maryland on charges of assaulting a federal officer earlier this year and this is his second case?

Because the judge who denied him bond mentioned that.

2
TomPaineSentMe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cozette, fren. I think you've lost the plot

Look up the men she mentioned.

3
TomPaineSentMe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well my point is he doesn't just work for Jack Smith. This isn't the only case he is involved in.

There could be lots of other reasons he's meeting with the White House Counsel.

Also this case involves classified info. There's probably a lot of stuff involving the executive branch

2
TomPaineSentMe 2 points ago +3 / -1

Hi,

None of that means the Indictments are over.

Several defendants have tried to say their case belongs in federal court.

In fact 5 of defendants are trying this. Mark Meadows was the first.

https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/fulton-county/5th-georgia-elections-indictment-case-defendant-asks-move-case-federal-court/DI5XIPOTCVEYBHD7752MUWB6EQ/

Co-defendants in the case who have asked to move their cases to federal court include Mark Meadows, Jeffrey Clark, Cathy Latham, David Shafer, and Shawn Still.

The argument is they were basically acting as a federal officer.

A federal official is not immune from state criminal prosecution “simply because of his office,” but instead must meet these two conditions:

  1. the federal official must have been engaged in conduct authorized by federal law or the Constitution
  1. the official must have done no “more than what was necessary and proper” to effectuate his federal duty.

Bottom Line

All this means is he filed a motion to move the case to federal court. So they're going to have a hearing on that

He could lose the hearing and the case would stay in state court.

He could win the hearing and then still face a federal trial. The indictment doesn't go away.

3
TomPaineSentMe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Jay Bratt has a day job involving National Security.

He is Chief of the Counterintelligence and Export Control Section, The National Security Division DOJ.

-1
TomPaineSentMe -1 points ago +3 / -4

Wait, is she saying we should admire crack dealers and murders?

Did anyone bother to look up who Larry Hoover and Big Meech are?

Because not only did they run criminal organizations and get caught. They are convicts. Big Meech hot 30 years. Larry Hoover got six life sentences.

Hood Billionaires wind up dead or in jail.

0
TomPaineSentMe 0 points ago +1 / -1

What pathway?

That thing is deader than disco.

All that's left is the attempts to find ways not to pay the $1 million they were ordered to pay.

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/judge-orders-mastermind-trump-legal-team-to-pay-hillary-clinton-dems-1m-in-sanctions/

I think this is just hopium.

-2
TomPaineSentMe -2 points ago +1 / -3

The US was involved in several wars four years ago.

Look at the number of drone strikes that year

0
TomPaineSentMe 0 points ago +2 / -2

There were several wars going on 4 years ago.

The economy was not at record levels. For example, in 2014 we gained over 3 million jobs that year alone

3
TomPaineSentMe 3 points ago +3 / -0

There's a psychological phenomenon where once you notice something or once you get interested in something you start to notice it everywhere. And seems like it's some new big trend, but in reality...previously it was just like background stuff you ignored.

My brother once bought a used car I never heard of. Right afterwards, I saw them everywhere. It wasn't that the car was more popular, in fact they had stopped making them. I just knew about them and my brain was able to recognize them now.

Went to find a link and this article uses the same example. Hilarious

Suddenly, the car is everywhere. It's parked in front of your house. Your boss's husband has one. You see two of them next to you in traffic on your way home from work.

https://science.howstuffworks.com/life/inside-the-mind/human-brain/baader-meinhof-phenomenon.htm

The Baader Meinhof phenomenon is a cognitive bias in which people tend to see a particular thing everywhere after noticing it for the first time.

It's called the Baader-Meinhof Phenomenon because someone once learned about this group, an East German terrorist group also known as the Red Army who were big in the 1970's. Hours after the first time he heard about them, he heard another reference to them. This was years after the group dissolved.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›