Where the D candidate is proven not to have won the Nov 3 election, the other candidate actually having received more votes, why do you want another election held?
What precedent and what law do you have, besides, what possible reason?
That tweet wasn't new, it was posted many times. The only thing new was the false claim that this was General Flynn's account and promoting this fake account.
You have shown yourself to be another POS who prefers lies to truth so long as the lie advances his preferred narrative.
Your type, the lie-defending type, are a cancer on our movement, the truth movement. By "our," I'm not including you, as defending lies and attacking truth has nothing to do with truth. All of what I said is true, to which your response is to attack. Begone.
Done with you.
You kind of missed the point that once again we have a thread title that is misinfo. The only thing claimed by the thread titles is "Ladies and gentlemen, General Flynn."
It's missing the point to let him and others know that that's a fake account?
Yeah, I know, so many care only about something being really cool for the narrative, who cares if the claimed facts are wrong.
No evidence whatsoever of being actually General Flynn.
Remember, Telegram doesn't give a rat's rear end and takes no action when people create fake LARPing accounts.
Btw, the Telegram "General McInerney" has no evidence of being the actual general, either. Ditto with "Mike Pompeo."
Do you think the real General Flynn would have so few subscribers?
If anyone can note if Pedo Joe gets stuffed into a filthy Suburban again instead of the Beast, that would be a great addition to this thread, if it comes to pass.
This time it was a real-deal Presidental VC-25A rather than a tired out smoke-belching C-32, so I'm hoping for a crappy limo at the least.
You're the one who knows the guy, and where a door may be open. One person tends to be concerned about this, another about that, one person already is a little awake in this area, while another is a little awake in another. No one else can tell you that. Different people will say different things leading to different openings. And these have to be known. None of us can for this guy. You can. As to what information you might use, you have plenty of resources here, it's up to YOU to decide which may work for a given person.
That's your answer. If you keep on begging for others to advise you what to do you when no one else knows this guy and can have the insights you ought to yourself, it will indeed look like you are just trolling.
How about people having evidence that supports their claim in the first place?
Sorry Patriot, when an OP posts claimed evidence that in no way says what he claims on it, then it's a fail, rather than "Ooooh what a cool narrative, let's go with that, maybe enough digging by someone other than OP will support it!"
I already dug. This is 100% unsupported.
If you disagree, provide the sauce. Thank you.
The website name "Military.com" sounds very official and legit, but it is just a for-clicks rag that has no association with the military.
The only "reference" or source in the link is a Wikipedia article, plus a fuzzy video that does nothing to support the claim.
Clickbait.
It doesn't say what the OP claims. At all.
This is simply yet another example of people going entirely by whether something would be really cool and great narrative, and if so they believe it and/or post it. Facts to back up the claim are unneeded when they love the narrative. Facts which prove the opposite will be ignored or fought against.
Trump might be in control of the military. If he is, no one has found a publicly available document to show this. This one is most certainly not it.
This isn't hopium, this is crapium.
I completely expect the plan included consideration of his possible actions, and quite likely allowed for his actions either way.
It is not as if merely him doing the right thing would have gotten the corrupt Congress to not certify Biden.
I doubt he was instructed to do the corrupt thing, even if his treason may work to advantage.
Also that's the webpage being discontinued rather than M1 reporting itself being discontinued: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M1SL
Also horrific data. A lot of the extreme increase in M1 though is from shifting of definition of what is M1 and what is non-M1 component of M2. (In other words, some previously non-M1 components of M2 were shifted to M1.)
And again, while M1 is still being reported (just on a different page with a definition change) a number of other M1-related things actually are no longer being reported by the St Louis Fed, such as M1 Money Multiplier (DISCONTINUED), Currency Component of M1 (DISCONTINUED),Total Checkable Deposits (DISCONTINUED), etc. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/categories/25
The data are bad but M2 reporting is not discontinued, but changed somewhat. It is the webpage being discontinued, replaced by:
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M2SL
The reason being, "Before May 2020, M2 consists of M1 plus (1) savings deposits (including money market deposit accounts); (2) small-denomination time deposits (time deposits in amounts of less than $100,000) less individual retirement account (IRA) and Keogh balances at depository institutions; and (3) balances in retail money market funds (MMFs) less IRA and Keogh balances at MMFs.
"Beginning May 2020, M2 consists of M1 plus (1) small-denomination time deposits (time deposits in amounts of less than $100,000) less IRA and Keogh balances at depository institutions; and (2) balances in retail MMFs less IRA and Keogh balances at MMFs. Seasonally adjusted M2 is constructed by summing savings deposits (before May 2020), small-denomination time deposits, and retail MMFs, each seasonally adjusted separately, and adding this result to seasonally adjusted M1.
"For more information on the H.6 release changes and the regulatory amendment that led to the creation of the other liquid deposits component and its inclusion in the M1 monetary aggregate, see the H.6 announcements and Technical Q&As posted on December 17, 2020."
However, actually discontinued are Total Savings Deposits at all Depository Institutions (DISCONTINUED), Retail Money Funds (DISCONTINUED), Non-M1 Components of M2 (DISCONTINUED), Savings Deposits - Total (DISCONTINUED), Small Time Deposits - Total (DISCONTINUED), and more: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/categories/29
Btw, can you provide a tip on how to downvote a crap thread? Clearly it can be done, as such threads do accumulate a few downvotes. But, I see no way to do it.
Or does one need a Comment Score of 1000 or something like that? I haven't seen information on that.
If anyone can help, it would be much appreciated. This thread would be a good first use, as it's false claim in title, old topic, tired, distraction at best, and disinfo at worst.
There is no way anyone with ethics would claim medical benefit to a "vaccine" with no long term testing for use against a virus with, for most demographics, an over 99.9% infection recovery rate, and thus no proven benefit to risk ratio.
The Covid situation is not medical. It is a political and economic weapon, not medical, and very little about the response has to do with medical.
Now, for a person who is seriously ill, and that can happen, it is a medical event for them, but I mean overall.
If it were medical, when the French HCQ/azithromycin studies by one of the leading infectious disease doctors in the world came out with only a single death among 3000 patients, most elderly, while the world was crying how fatal Covid was, that would have brought joy and hope, rather than instant near-universal condemnation with lies of HCQ allegedly being so dangerous and somehow there being no benefits or the benefits were not worth the alleged extreme risk.
If it were medical, corticosteroid use to address cytokine storm would have been continued from the beginning (doctors were using it initially as it's obvious) rather than promptly stopped by false orders that it was supposedly harmful.
If it were medical, patients needing only assistance with breathing rather than forced ventilation would have been put on CPAP or Bi-PAP rather than ventilators which commonly themselves kill patients, instead of CPAP and Bi-PAP use being banned for Covid patients because of supposedly "aerosolizing the virus."
It it were medical, when it was found that there were populations such as prisons where out of just over 3000 inmates and staff, over 3000 tested positive yet almost no one was ill at all, everyone would have realized that for most people there is no threat and further, such mild, attenuated strains should be allowed to spread naturally so as to achieve herd immunity quickly, rather than insist on quarantine. Covid would have burnt out quickly and been long over by now if that had been done.
if it were medical, PCR testing would be not be run at 1,000 to one million times higher sensitivity than is medically valid. The sensitivity is exponential, so each 10 added cycles beyond the norm of about 30 increases sensitivity by just over 1000 times, and they got to running as many as 50 cycles.
If it were medical, masks would not be mandated.
Businesses would not be shut down.
It goes on and on.
To understand what is going on, the idea of medical facts having anything to do with Covid response must be discarded, because it absolutely is not medical. It is a weapon for globalists, leftists, and the "Great Reset," and against Patriots in every country worldwide.
Whenever I see that lettering I know it is from the same guy that so far has put out nothing but idiot (zero sauce) videos.
Rather than expect people to spend time watching this, can you summarize the sauce if any in there? In none of these that I have seen has there ever been any.
Or if there isn't any, it would be great if you could let us know that too rather than, collectively, dozens or hundreds of people wasting their time to find there is nothing.
Thank you.
Note the complete lack of sources. There is absolutely no evidence anywhere here except that somebody typed something.
Barr crooked? Most likely! Has Barr acted before in the Deep State's interests? Of course, consider his protecting the murderous FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi. Is Barr quite wealthy already? That's a fact, and he probably got that way more as payoffs than genuinely earned, as opinion. I don't seriously think any legal position is worth what he was paid between government stints.
My point is not to say Barr is honest, but to bring out the fact that the cited claim here has zero evidence, and it is necessary to keep track of when things have zero evidence versus when there actually is evidence.
Btw, if wishing some evidence on the giant sums Barr has been paid allegedly simply for legal expertise and time: https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2019/07/19/how-attorney-general-bill-barr-built-a-40-million-fortune
Incidentally, the story claiming that the zero-evidence single payoff supposedly of $7 million exceeded his existing net worth does not line up with his at least somewhat-evidenced net worth being much more than that. That supports the story being not only unevidenced, but fake entirely and a careless one at that.
Both BIN and what it cites, RRN, which has only anonymous (if even actual) sources.
Here's another anonymous sourced gem from them, said source allegedly getting his hands on a letter written by Pence: https://realrawnews.com/2021/02/pences-plea-to-trump-please-dont-have-me-whacked/#
“Dear Mr. President: You are justifiably angry at me for my participation in helping to seat Joe Biden in the White House. As you know, I’ve spent little time at home, concerned partly because I fear your wrath, and partly because I fear the wrath of your supporters who consider me a traitor. If I could redo that day, I would, but now I must accept the consequences of my actions. I apologize for betraying you, my commander-in-chief and friend. I ask you to consider at least the four years I spent beside you, defending you from onslaught after onslaught of relentless attack. I apologize for allowing myself to be swayed by public opinion, and for allowing Democrats to cloud my judgement. There is no contrition for my crimes, and I can only imagine the depth of your disappointment. I know you can never forget my transgressions, but can you forgive? I promise, from this day forward, to help right my wrongs; I want to correct my mistakes. Remember the day we watched Goodfellas in the Oval and laughed as Tommy got whacked in the end. We joked about people we thought needed to be whacked. Please don’t have me whacked…” the letter read.
Really?
I saw with my own eyes on video captures Biden votes jump by an exact number as Trump votes dropped by the exact same number. It is not as if such was the single such case. That's easily corrected.
And if Sidney Powell and others are correct about fractional votes and pre-loading of machines, that's easily corrected.
Do you have evidence they are wrong?
Do you have evidence that hand count of physical ballots -- my goodness, imagine doing that! -- would leave dispute as to whether Trump won?
You think the Trump landslide was too small to prove who actually won?
Why?
You saying that 75 million-plus actual Trump votes vs perhaps 60-something million actual Biden votes as a guess are "beyond redemption" is you.
I note you couldn't name the law or precedent for holding a replacement election once fraud is proven the sole cause of a person having been falsely put into office..