If you stop to consider the overarching objective and the strategy employed, there is no reason to panic. The objective isn’t to just get the current Iranian Government to capitulate, it is to cut the Cabal’s strings and truly liberate Iran.
The strategy employed should actually put people’s minds at ease. There was no conventional saber rattling. No build up to justify a boots on the ground invasion and occupation. Instead there were crippling strikes against their command and control, and their military. Next, was the equally crippling blockade that has a stranglehold on Iran’s oil industry and economy.
But, that blockade isn’t just impacting the economy of Iran. It is impacting the EU, the UK, and Israel. Those impacts aren’t collateral damage, they are intentional, they are leverage to eliminate the NWO’s control over the corrupt Iranian regime and by extension the people of Iran.
That’s my opinion and analysis, for what it’s worth. Knowing what is at stake, I don’t mind paying more for gas now, because we’re going to be living in a better version of the world when this is done. And, gas prices are going to plummet when the Strait of Hormuz reopens.
Remember when Graham asked very specific questions about Unlawful Enemy Combatants to then SCOTUS nominee Kavanaugh? I can’t find the video clip, but I think about it occasionally.
I don’t understand Graham’s role in all of this, but POTUS seems to still have some use for him. And, given the choice between the two, I’ll follow POTUS over Flynn.
The “free market” Bessent trashed is the illusion the NWO has been selling to us for decades. But, I have to begrudgingly admit it was pretty smart to brand their system of economic control as “the free market” system.
I live close enough to Massie’s district that I was inundated with ads for this race. I didn’t find the ads for either candidate to be very good or persuasive. So, I’m not sure how much the money really influenced the outcome.
This race followed the same pattern as incumbents Liz Cheney and Tom Rice being defeated during in a primary. President Trump endorsed their opponent and used his bullhorn to bash them. Each race followed a similar pattern, primary turnout nearly doubled and the incumbent was readily defeated.
What I think should be concerning to all of is the fact both candidates were getting the majority of their financial support from Pro-Israel entities. That’s something that should make us all curious.
It wasn’t necessary to be curious about Gallrein, there has been a vocal and concerted effort to make sure people knew he was getting this level of support from Pro-Israel groups.
On the other hand, it is scarcely mentioned that Massie is also backed by a major Pro-Israel organization. Maybe it’s because Yass claims to be libertarian and it takes a little digging to learn Yass is a big AIPAC supporter who also supports Netanyahu.
But, honestly, is it surprising that people who want control would butter both sides of their political bread?
Yass also provides substantial financial support to AIPAC.
The best defense I could make for Massie is that he sincerely believes what he says, but the net effect of his political career has maintained the status quo.
That’s why in spite of Massie’s rhetoric being diametrically opposed to other causes Yass supports, Yass recognizes Massie’s votes will almost always block real change. And, blocking real change is the objective.
I always chuckle when the backseat drivers feel the need to tell the guy swinging the wrecking ball against the Cabal how he could do it better. Prior to Donald Trump surprising the world and becoming POTUS, I don’t recall these people being so bold.
If POTUS is controlled by Israel there would be no Abraham Accords. The last thing Israel’s DS wants is lasting peace in the Middle East.
If POTUS is controlled by Israel, we would not have taken the lead in Iran. Instead, we would have set back and let Israel do what they always do, stir the pot just enough to keep the region in turmoil.
The Q drops listed the rogue nuclear states who are leveraged to protect the Cabal and they were being systematically taken off the list. The drops told us there would come a day where Iran was next. And, they told us a certain country was being saved for last. Everything we’re seeing today was basically foretold.
Instead of putting stars, and former stars on stage, put average Americans who have undiscovered talent up there. We should be showcasing people who make up the fabric of our country. My guess is we have literally millions of people with equal, or more talent than these “stars” the music industry selected to put in front of us.
SCOTUS narrowed the Milligan precedent in the 1942 case Ex parte Quirin. They ruled that it does not protect those classified as unlawful enemy combatants under the laws of war.
I think there were also a couple cases that came up during the aftermath of 9/11 that further addressed unlawful enemy combatants. And, there are Q posts where Lindsey Graham was asking Brett Kavanaugh very pointed questions about how the law treats unlawful enemy combatants. Unfortunately, I don’t have time to dig them up right now.
What I am having trouble reconciling is that Massie’s single largest donor also supports AIPAC.
I know there is a technicality that those donations get washed through a PAC run by former Rand Paul campaign people. But, that doesn’t mean Massie had to quietly accept that support, he could have publicly asked for it to stop.
This seems to beg two serious questions:
Why would someone who supports AIPAC also support Massie?
Why would Massie accept that support?
My money is on the white hats.
When I learned who Massie’s biggest donor is, I started questioning the veracity of Massie’s anti-Israel rhetoric. While it’s true the money gets washed through a PAC, Massie is well aware where the money originates. He could easily ask that Yass not support him.
It seems to me Massie fits the definition of performative controlled opposition. You grandstand a lot, but your real objective is to slow down reforms that threaten the status quo.
I looked at a couple other primaries where President Trump went after a Republican opponent and the results were similar.
When Harriet Hageman unseated Liz Cheney in 2022, turnout was up 70 percent.
I also took a look at 2022 when Tom Rice was primaried in South Carolina. There was no primary in 2020 due to Covid. During the 2018 primary there were 45,812 votes cast, he won. During 2022 there were 85,212 votes cast to unseat him. That’s an 86% increase in turnout, so it’s a fair precedent.
It’s also an example of Democrat’s hypocrisy. All their race baiting rhetoric goes out the window if their own political career is at stake. If she was true to Democrat doctrine Wasserman-Schultz would retire and make room for a minority candidate.
I have one difference of opinion. It might actually be about Israel and its DS. They desire to hamstring President Trump’s efforts to bring down the cabal and hopefully run the clock out in his term.
If paying people to besmirch their country and claim it is controlling President Trump severely erodes his political power they would privately be congratulating themselves. Publicly they would discredit all their controlled opposition operatives and continue their influence operations.
You’re right, the bulk of Yass’s support went to PACs. I’m not sure who controls them. But, can’t it be said that is just a clever way to make it appear there us an “arm’s length” relationship?
Wouldn’t a principled person would publicly ask that someone with such wide ideological differences stop their support? So far, to my knowledge, he never publicly asked Yass to stop funding PACs that support his campaign.
I clicked on this thinking the money flows discussion was going to be about Massie’s largest benefactor. So far the only post on the guy dates back to Mastriano’s run for PA Governor.
In the OP twitter post Mastriano claims the Yass organization would only support his candidacy if he renounced President Trump.
https://greatawakening.win/search?params=Yass&community=GreatAwakening
The Yass organization is also allegedly a big supporter of Netanyahu and his effort to make changes to Israel’s Judicial Branch.
I’m trying to understand how Massie could claim to be ant-Israel and accept support from this guy?
Think about it. Under BO and Biden, coal plants were regulated out of existence. The only way solar could ever produce more electricity than coal required persecuting and shutting coal-fired power plants down.