1
Vapourface 1 point ago +1 / -0

The point is, RFK is forced to write ludicrous tweets talking about the October 6th "Holocaust" and how being mildly critical of Israel is a "moral malady". Those tweets are obviously forced out of him, no serious person would use such lurid exaggerations, unless they were under duress.

2
Vapourface 2 points ago +2 / -0

In the UK a local authority is building a road that is not needed - through a grove of hundreds of fruit trees that have been there years. Blocking the exits before the fire?

4
Vapourface 4 points ago +4 / -0

Meanwhile the BBC is running virtual puff-pieces on Farage (who normally they hate) so he can get-through his botched attempt to cancel Lowe (who he threw out of the party for made-up bullshit reasons, real reason: he's for real and Farage is not)

8
Vapourface 8 points ago +8 / -0

Instead of dumping a tax abolition.... take it down slowly in the form of MASSIVE INCENTIVES to re-industrialise. It makes sense. You could eliminate tax all together, but you risk a capital flight to foreign goods. Better to take it down in a way that improves domestic industrial investment. Later, once the industrial base is rebuilt, you can remove the taxes wholesale, and you are now in a better position. It's actually genius.

7
Vapourface 7 points ago +7 / -0

https://nitter.poast.org/SecKennedy/status/1904259440544743427#m

People are quite forthright in their replies. I wonder if this is a "fully-insulated" event. RFK is ostensibly offering sympathetic words, but it is so obviously biased language, it only highlights the absurdity by using the word "holocaust"

Incredible how this is being received.

1
Vapourface 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can the BBC make Trump any more orange? Holy crap they have stopped the hue slider just before everything turns red

19
Vapourface 19 points ago +19 / -0

"the truth will shock the world" which appears several times, gets conflated with this.

6
Vapourface 6 points ago +6 / -0

Would modernity have even happened without them? probably not if we are being fair. And the thing about interest is, it's known, it's agreed, it's often fixed. You can borrow $2000 and buy a car, and keep rolling over the loan, or choosing a long payback period, and end up paying $10,000 to the bank. But that is your choice.

Or you can buy a van for $2000, and work hard and payback the loan in a year, and payback $2100 to the bank, and go on to build a business that makes you a millionaire. The bank, the lender, just wants their 5% they do not want 5% of your business, just of that loan. They do not some knocking after you’ve made $10M looking for half a million because without you they would be nothing (a friend who loans for no fee might very well do this)

Usurious conduct is when you lend a widow $1000 because you know she owns a farm with 900 acres she cannot operate. And you tell her, don’t worry about payback, I will add the payments you cannot make to the loan, but the loan is now risky so the rate will have to rise to 20% And then three years later the widow owes you the entire farm. Or you charge 300% interest etc. Regulated banking is nothing like this, but in the middle ages it was.

3
Vapourface 3 points ago +3 / -0

Like with the vax, Trump stays optically isolated, while we tell the story with the plot points laid out. While the truth comes out, Trump can continue doing. Whereas if he were making statements against the vax or zionism, as a vanguard lone soldier, he would be cut down and the whole truth suppressed, and we would have nothing.

1
Vapourface 1 point ago +1 / -0

The story was always that the site was direct onto bedrock. Often remarked upon that the bedrock itself under the footprint was exceptionally level, and that was deliberate levelling process during construction. The solid monolithic bedrock is limestone iirc not granite. They brought in some granite for the chamber linings and lintels but mainly local limestone in the construction, set upon limestone.

3
Vapourface 3 points ago +3 / -0

Opponents will say Trump just wants to clear the way for unrestricted executive power.. and that is probably true, we hope for good purpose, but their attacks are on stupid grounds, so it looks like all they care about is stopping things whatever they are. It's so stupid for them to block good and obviously popular things that make sense. They do a disservice to the principles they pretend to hold.

2
Vapourface 2 points ago +2 / -0

"the CIA" is the newest limited-hangout, so nebulous. It's like saying "a human stole my car" humans are bad, ok well, lessons learned.

Until actual culprits ID'd then it's worthless to say "this huge organisation did it"

5
Vapourface 5 points ago +5 / -0

Isn’t the US under emergency powers already? since 911 and never revoked I heard once, not sure if legit though.

16
Vapourface 16 points ago +16 / -0

I didn't know the constitution said anything about paying leftists to subvert the constitution, but I guess I don't know everything.

2
Vapourface 2 points ago +2 / -0

Keep in mind RT is blocked across Europe and Euro media NEVER reports on anything the Russians say, except to misquote occasionally.

13
Vapourface 13 points ago +13 / -0

James Angleton - Israeli agent https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Jesus_Angleton was responsible for "the Israel desk" as liaison with Israel's Mossad and Shin Bet agencies. He was Oswalds handler, arranging for him to be on location to be the patsy, having set up fake movements and comms implicating him as a communist hitman for commie reasons. Oswald was supposed to be killed on the day, but that went wrong, so Angleton instructed his man, Reuben Efron, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reuben_Efron to arrange for Oswald to be killed by another Zionist Jack Rubenstein, hired via Mickey_Cohen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mickey_Cohen the mobster after the hit, which was almost certainly carried out by others and NOT Oswald.

JFK was killed for being an impediment to Israels nuclear programme.

I imagine there is no mention of this, the real reason for the killing, in the files. Those files will have been edited years ago to ensure the real reason was never openly stated - zionists did it.

3
Vapourface 3 points ago +3 / -0

This week: "They need armed protection in lawless South Africa"

Last week: "South Africa is the rainbow nation of peace"

Week prior: "Nobody needs guns for protection"

12
Vapourface 12 points ago +12 / -0

Everything is owned by a handful of companies, who also own each other. Ultimately someone owns those companies. Yes, most of the value is pension money etc but a large chunk is outright owned by someone.

Now, if that entity were convicted of human trafficking, and had their assets seized, now the US government owns everything. Much of the apparent national debt was owed to this entity that now is owned by the US government. Hence the US gov owes itself some fraction of the 30 Trillion. Debt is cancelled out in a moment of book-keeping penmanship. Golden Age.

view more: Next ›