Also is a FISA Indictmenta thing?
I don't think it is
JAG is not military intelligence.
JAG would also absolutely refuse to use the military for some secret roundup of civilians because they understand the Lindsay/Kavanaugh is limited to a tiny, tiny sliver of instances like a John Walker Lindh being captured on a battlefield.
JAGs know the Uniform Code of Mlitary Justice almost never applies to regular civilians who commit crimes
Depends if you want to talk reality or not Military intelligence is not involved in prosecutions
It means it's unlikely that full appeals panel will rule his way.
They are unlikely to move the trial once jurors are being selected. They are not even meeting on the gag order until the trial will have started
She wasn't?
This article buries the lede.
Trump was trying with these motions to delay the trial.
Judge Cynthia Kern responded to Trump’s request for a stay of the entire proceeding with skepticism,
He asked for a stay for his change of venue motion and for his gag order motion and both were rejected.
Jury selection begins Monday, this motion doesn't go before the appeals court until April 29th.
Since the IPO there has been hundreds of blasphemous articles
????
I don't think anonymous posting the issue they were concerned with.
Lol.
OMG.
This is hilarious
it's quite clearly what Trump didn't want.
why does this have a let's go flair?
it's a common and well known psychological phenomenon.
10 years ago 17 had no special meaning to you. It probably didn't have any special meaning until it was pointed out that Q is the 17th letter of the alphabet.
let's say you are at the grocery store 10 years ago and something costs $3.17 that would have been meaningless to you and your brain would ignore it. Now 17 pops out at you and you "notice" it. That's called selective attention which is part of this
first time it ever happened to me was when my brother bought a car model I never heard of. Then I started seeing them everywhere. The whole phenomenon is called the frequency illusion.
is this the correct link? it's from 2022.
You get a number of challenges to knock jurors out.
So if the juror is not challenged they get on, but that's a bit different from saying both sides wanted that person.....because you can't waste your challenges.
Like if you have 5 times more challenges maybe you would have challenged that person.
every one of the questions he asked, we know.
What seems awfully high? It comes from this Q post.
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/1804534.html#1804985
By giving the IG a prosecutor they can now go after the deep state without looking like a political witch hunt. This is critical.
-Sessions informed Congress in his letter that all the matters recommended for investigation by Goodlatte, Gowdy, and Grassley are “fully within the scope of [Huber’s] existing mandate.” He also informed the chairmen that **Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who is working with Huber, has a staff of 470 investigators, **
How many of these are indictments though?
I'll ask it another way. Can you find me a single sealed indictment in DC that is still sealed a year later.
So I just went to the site and searched for indictment
I found this case. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/16757265/united-states-v-mcgee-sr/
It says this guy was arrested and the case unsealed
Jan 23, 2020 Arrest of Morris McGee, Sr. on 1/23/20. (S,HR)
Jan 23, 2020 Case unsealed as to Morris McGee, Sr. (S,HR)
And that the case was terminated in Feb 2020.
We have no idea what type of document is sealed in these cases.
The entire court record for juvenile defendants is sealed I believe. So even after the case is over things can remain sealed
Go here and look for sealed documents and see which things can be sealed.
It also points to these
The Federal Judicial Center provides comprehensive explanations of these issues in two downloadable booklets: Sealing Court Records and Proceedings: A Pocket Guide and Confidential Discovery: A Pocket Guide on Protective Orders.
Lots of types of court documents are sealed. You can't tell from pacer which are which.
But there's lots of reasons court documents are sealed.
You can't tell if these documents are indictments.
Also every document is not a case. I wonder if there is multiples counting there. You can have many sealed documents within the same case
Didn't Q say the the 470 was the number of people in the IG's office ?
Or it means that section 702 FISA law is up for reauthorization. Deadline is April 19th 4 fompeting bills are pending
Or is Ron Wyden your idea of good? Or the Brennan Center
https://www.wyden.senate.gov/news/press-releases/wyden-lee-davidson-and-lofgren-introduce-bipartisan-legislation-to-reauthorize-and-reform-key-surveillance-law-secure-protections-for-americans-rights
https://twitter.com/BrennanCenter/status/1768380159231426716?t=QGmR7nkqfr_G9IoJGx5abA&s=19
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/whats-next-reforming-section-702-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-act