I'm sorry to hear that. Here is a tidbit from my observations. I manage an office building that has a business center in it. It's a fairly big building. Three floors, roughly 30,000 sq ft so I see quite a few people on a daily basis and know them well enough to know what's happening with their health to some degree. 2 men in the Business Center who had the jab--and only the first round--have now have cancer. Of those two men, one had blood clots in his calves before the cancer--he's in his 60s. The other is 51 and now has colon cancer. The picture of health until now. Two other men in the business center now have heart issues that they didn't have prior to the jab. A realtor in the company across the hall went to Mexico on vacation last year to get his scuba certifcation up to date. His SCUBA diving cert, mind you. Flew back. Died later that day. He was 57. One woman in the Business Center that I know of had the jab. She now has all sorts of health issues, including diabetes. She's 34.
Your wife is literally risking her life, as I'm sure you know. We can't make their choices for them. We just have to love them where they are. If I were you, I would consider warning her of how pissed off you're going to be if she gets sick courtesy of the jab and then it's on you to take care of her. Just a thought.
I pray for you and your wife, sir. Maybe your heard work on this document will save other people's lives. Blessings to you.
Yes, President Trump came to Wisconsin to stump for Michels for governor and for Adam Steen in the primary against Vos. Vos is good buddies with Paul Ryan who still calls the shots in Wisconsin, controlling the mostly-RINO Republicans we're being daily betrayed by. It's infuriating. But there are lots of people in Wisconsin pushing back against these traitors and Vos is our top target. Anybody paying attention is quite sure that Vos cheated to beat Adam Steen in the primary and managed it barely. The write-in effort is organized so I'm hoping they pull it off. Will follow up when we know more tomorrow.
Time depends on how close you want to be. I've been to three rallies and the one we got closest, we arrived 8 hours early. My best advice: GOOD SHOES. You'll be standing for a long time. Also, dress for the evening weather.
They'll search your purse, but they won't let you take in backpacks. My experience is food in line is fine. They're fine with cell phones, but I didn't test the battery charger issue, but would be surprised if they blocked them.
Don't know how old your son is so a lot will depend on how long he'll be okay with standing. The one I went to with my Mom and mother-in-law, we were standing for 12 hours before it was over. But none of us had any regrets and they're both in their 70s. It was great!
19 is one of the cult's favorite numbers, according to Juan. He says that it's related to "the other physics." The other physics is what Tesla understood and it's not taught in universities. The cult likes to signal what is their doing by marking their doings with their favorite numbers. I'm wondering about this lottery deal. Ever since I had read about Jeffrey Epstein winning the lottery in Nevada, I think it was, I've seen lotteries as another money laundering avenue--like the Nobel prize and the Pulitzer, etc.
I bought Juan's book The Kid by the Side of the Road first edition as a pdf for $11, I think it was, and read it immediately, the whole thing. It's like 75 pages or so. I so enjoyed it that the $11 pdf price didn't bother me in the least. And then he offered the hardcopy to people who had the pdf for that same price and I jumped right on that. When I received it, I was shocked. My first thought was, There is no way Juan can make any money off of these books. First--they're huge. Like old-time Life Magazine size as far as width and length. Except thick, high-quality paper and full color. Besides the quality of the books themselves, the price to mail them out had to have swallowed up any profit that was left after the printing costs. Anybody who knows anything about the publishing world can pretty quickly assess that Juan didn't make any money on these books. I've bought the second edition and a few extras for gifts since that first one and they were worth every penny and would have been at twice as much in my mind. He's not a paytriot.
I found Juan in his days on Field McConnell's broadcasts. He wasn't selling anything back then. And some of his broadcasts on Spaceshot76 predate the Q movement, I believe. And his interviews or lectures on The Hagmann Report predate the Q movement by several years. (Oldest I've listened to there date back to 2013.) He has been a Patriot for a long time. People get frustrated by the repetition, but I find getting through the stuff I've heard before well worth it usually for that nugget he drops that I never heard him drop before.
He's a Biblical scholar of extraordinary range and he's got a handle on physics in a way 99% of college professors likely have no idea about. He's a man of great depth and breadth of learning. People who disparage him in my opinion have not listened to enough of his material to judge objectively.
I was talking about the Luciferian accusation in the whole comment. It's the first thing I was addressing. It's poor form by your assessment, not by mine. Everybody's a critic.
Come on now, do you want to hear my BEST pun ever? It was this one. It was in the context of my very good-hearted neighbor not being able to kill any of his hens after they were no longer able to lay eggs (which I don't blame him, that would be hard, which is probably why I don't have chickens myself). I said, "So what do you call it when a chicken can't lay eggs anymore?" And there was the answer immediately in my head and I popped it out at the dinner table: "HEN-O-PAUSE". I still hold the title as maker of the most supreme pun in our household. No small accomplishment around here.
I was not quoting out of context. The context was right above for anybody to read.
Clearly I've hit a sore spot with you. I'd apologize except that I owe you no apology. We're all adults here and we get to choose how we feel. You want to choose to be offended by my "reaction" to your comments, that's your choice.
Come on, now--"vibe rater", that's pretty good. Would have been better if I had said, "You may want to re-calibrate your vibe-rater." Still, that's a pretty good pun. Not my best work, but pretty good.
Can you expand on this? If David Wilcock is a Luciferian I would genuinely like to know that. You mean you think he's a practicing satanist? Or he's like the people who are in the lower levels of the freemasons and have no idea what they're really a part of?
I am not telling anybody what to think. I'm expressing my own opinion. I figure people don't need me to tell THEM what to think anymore than I need them telling ME what to think. So if you're getting that kind of vibe from my comment, then you're vibe-rater is out of calibration.
I don't see David Wilcock as Luciferian--at least not intentionally. He separated from Gaia TV because he said they were spinning his appearances on Ancient Aliens to support a Luciferian perspective on history. He also purports to be a Christian (as do many who aren't, I know, but it's at least worth noting that he regularly makes reference to his Christian beliefs). What I always go back to when I'm assessing David Wilcock is his book "The Source Field Investigations." This is good, solid work. I think what throws people off about David Wilcock is that I believe he's a genuine "autist" as in he is Asperger's, i.e., on the autistic spectrum. That makes him awkward socially, but it's likely also the root of his focus.
"NowTheyAllLose" calls him a "piece of filth". Having read all but one of David's books and seen many, many of his presentations, I don't see that. David puts a lot of emphasis on The Law of One books as a philosophy and as truth. I have read the first book and a half of those and can't get past that point. They set off my spidey sense. I wouldn't go so far as to call them Luciferian, as I'm not qualified to make that assessment since I've not read all of them. But if I did get through them and came to that conclusion, it would not surprise me. I think Satan's capabilities for deception know no bounds.
So, I could be wrong, of course, because once upon a time I thought Tom Hanks was the greatest, but I don't think David Wilcock is a "piece of filth." Supporting a Luciferian viewpoint without realizing it maybe, but I think that's been true at varying levels for many people before the Great Awakening got under way. I mean, as an example, how many of us loved Tom Hanks and voted for a Bush or a Clinton or some other POS satanist?
Good to see the searchvoat link. The goats did a lot of good work on pizzagate at Voat. I feel blessed to have been there mostly reading their work while it was happening. Citizens on a mission. God bless them and all those who keep digging for truth.