Maybe the deleted comments supported them?

I would like to see Starbucks, Walmart and McDonalds employees unionized so that their employers can't take advantage of them. Is that an unpopular opinion?

Have fun out there, and thanks for the resources.

There were a lot of great questions asked in that thread, like why that would be the best way to destroy a hard drive. It was also pointed out that it was only reported that a computer tower was hit, never specifically the hard drive.

I didn't see anything about his bullet hitting a hard drive, where can I find info on that?

You don't need AI if you wanted to fake something like this, just a sick imagination and paintbrush.

My guess is that it started as a joke on 4chan and someone pretended it was legit for internet points.

As an aside, being insulting about it doesn't help anyone.

FIRST TRIMESTER 80% loss of Caucasian fetus if mom recently jabbed.

Are you saying 80% of first trimester miscarriages are when the mother was vaxed? What percentage of the mothers are vaxed in the first place? If that's also 80% then the value is in line. If that datapoint is unavailable then the stat is kinda meaningless, no?

I wish he'd realize that using a flawed statistic hurts his case/credibility. And then again to people who share it.

Guess this was published before the nationwide strikes

When was this published? 4 years ago is when the covid outbreak started, and it wasn't a longshot to predict it would have chaotic effects on the world economy

81% miscarriage rate? That's not something that can be swept under the rug. Color me skeptical.

I had to look up what forum sliding is, and I don't think I'm doing that, unless you want to debate its meaning ;)

And yeah I like to debate! If you can't convince me with proof in hand, how do you expect to wake people up! Mostly kidding, but look at it as an opportunity to give people here a concise summary of why this is a great delta and they can share it along with the picture to any naysayers.

Edit: to be clear, I was kidding about debating forum sliding. I kinda get your point now that I let it simmer, but I still stand by my comments as meaningful.

Maybe you can help me see what you're seeing then.

A Q drop contained a cannon. Considering that the trial has been ongoing for 11 months, isn't it likely that any day of the week will have news about the trial (and therefore Judge Cannon)?

It had "Future comms" inside it, so the fact that something happened in the future makes it relevant? What about all the other content of the drop? Is that just ignored?

Pump the brakes because the delta is a picture of a cannon and Eileen Cannon has been on the case for almost a year already and she herself didn't do anything significant on the delta day of the cannon post?

You think that the judge will buy that Trump hired ineffective counsel?

Todd Blanche & Emil Bove: Lawyers Blanche and Bove, who are representing Trump at his trial, are both partners at Blanche Law, which FEC filings show has been paid approximately $4 million by Save America between April 2023—right after Trump was indicted in Manhattan—and March 31, the most recent date for which campaign finance data is available.

Susan Necheles: Trump attorney Necheles, an experienced defense attorney who previously represented the Trump Organization in its criminal tax fraud case, was paid approximately $1.7 million by Save America between April 2023 and March 31.

He also told the defense that they should have objected at the time and not waited until afterwards to ask for a mistrial.

This would be over pretty quickly if she admitted that, can you provide more etails?

And yet rumble operates freely in the USA?

More like confirmation bias

If you look at the usernames on the left (recent) post, you can see how they're all clearly generated -- two words put together and some random numbers.

Looks to me like bots trying to build a "history" so that they can pass off as real people later for scamming.

You're right that I shouldn't have used such a prescriptive tone, especially after you told me that you didn't appreciate it, sorry about that.

Please take it as a suggestion instead.

The reason I feel strongly about it is that I believe people, here especially, should be informed about exact details so that if they enter debate, or try to "awaken" someone, they have all the facts and can do so confidently. It gives a lot more credibility in these circumstances.

There were 9 specific "truths" posted to truth social that the judge deemed violated the gag order because they were about jurors/witnesses/family members.

This information is easy to find, you should make yourself aware so that you can convince people who aren't informed of what what's happening with actual facts.

To make sure this doesn't happen again in the future, what part of

Since when does speaking out in one's own defense constitute a breach of a gag-order?

was sarcasm? If the entire thing, then you were implying that it wasn't "speaking out in one's own defense"?

You should read more than just the headline or even this article if you want the full details on the fine. Saying it was just "in his own defense" is one way to spin it.

The nationwide ban is divisive among Republicans. Trump doesn't even support it

That "loophole" was closed, even the Catholics accepted it https://cacatholic.org/news/ab-2223-infanticide-bill-amended/