1
CasuallyObservant 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks, Libtard. BUT PLEASE, COULD YOU HELP A BIT MORE?

Do you mind answering a few specifics, please?

  • Was the DMSO in a cream, gel or liquid form?
  • How much each of the DMSO, the Aloe gel and the Artemisia tincture did you mix together?
  • Can you share the brand name of the Artemisia tincture you used?
  • Can you share the brand name of the DMSO that worked for you?
  • Did you rub it on and cover it with something or leave it open air?
  • How many days of application before it stopped itching?
  • When it stopped itching was the visible skin manifestation still visible or had that cleared?
  • If it stopped itching, but the skin rash was still visible, how long until the skin looked normal again?
  • Did you know you had been bitten by the tick and did you see and remove it? Or, had it dropped off and you knew because of your clear physical manifestations and symptoms?

Thanks in advance. I am making a file for myself. More details are better!

1
CasuallyObservant 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is amazing. I am so happy to hear of your great results.

2
CasuallyObservant 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can you come back to here when you've done your second round and report to us whether it made the difference?

3
CasuallyObservant 3 points ago +3 / -0

I dont know. here's what A.I. says:

The real name of the Israeli politician known as Ben-Gvir:

Itamar Ben-Gvir.

Ancestry and Family Background? = Mizrahi Jewish Descent:

Itamar Ben-Gvir belongs to a Mizrahi Jewish family of Middle Eastern origin.

Mother's Background:

His mother, Shoshana Ben-Gvir, was a Kurdish Jewish immigrant from Iraq. In her youth, she was an operative for the Irgun, a Zionist paramilitary organization active during the British Mandate period, before becoming a homemaker.

Father's Background:

His father, Zadok Ben-Gvir, was born in Jerusalem to Jewish immigrants from Iraqi Kurdistan. He worked for a gasoline company and was a writer.

Despite his later alignment with radical right-wing religious Zionism, Ben-Gvir was raised in a secular, politically moderate household in Mevaseret Zion, a suburb of Jerusalem.

(AI can make mistakes, so double-check)

12
CasuallyObservant 12 points ago +12 / -0

Who is Mr. Pool and why did he get to see the Blueprints of this top secret facility? And if it is top secret, why is he telling everyone about it?

9
CasuallyObservant 9 points ago +9 / -0

WHO IS BEN GVIR?

  • Itamar Ben-Gvir is an Israeli politician and lawyer who has served as the Minister of National Security since 2022
  • Member of the Israeli Knesset
  • He is the leader of Otzma Yehudit ("Jewish Power"), an Israeli far-right, Kahanist and anti-Arab party which won six seats in the 2022 legislative election and is part of the thirty-seventh government of Israel.
  • Ben-Gvir is a settler in the Israeli-occupied West Bank; according to the BBC, his "political background lies in Kahanism—a violently racist movement that supports the expulsion of Palestinians from their lands".
  • He has a long history of anti-Arab activism, leading to dozens of indictments and at least eight convictions of crimes including incitement to racism and support for, as well as possession of propaganda of, a terrorist organization (the now-illegal Kach political party).
  • As a lawyer, he is known for defending Jews accused of Jewish extremist terrorism in Israeli courts.
1
CasuallyObservant 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bookmark this post and please report back so the rest of us can hear your results!

8
CasuallyObservant 8 points ago +8 / -0

So give us more deets, please!

How often?

How big of a spot do you paint on?

How much DMSO do you rub in?

How long before you noticed a difference?

1
CasuallyObservant 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's the law of Eminent Domain. It's been this way since the federal government’s right to use it was implicitly recognized when the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified on December 15, 1791!

FYI: "Eminent Domain" is the legal power of the government, or its authorized delegates, to seize private property for public use without the owner's consent.

In the United States, this authority is governed by the Fifth Amendment, which requires that the taking serve a "public use" and that property owners receive "just compensation."

1
CasuallyObservant 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. Read my other comments. The guy hasn't lived there for decades. He's been renting it out to tenants. He's been holding on to the tiny house on the tiny dirt lot (4,000 s.f. lot shaped like a triangle) for the Big Payout, hoping to strike it rich.

He turned down a one million dollar offer,($1,000,000.00!) claiming he wanted to move the house and it would cost $3 million to relocate it, which is B.S.

This is a MONEY GRAB struggle and nothing else. And now, he'll be forced to take a much lesser offer.

1
CasuallyObservant 1 point ago +1 / -0

Except, he hasn't lived there for decades. He tried to use the 'but it's my home' victim argument. But he's been living elsewhere and renting it out to others for many years.

ASU even upped the offer to $999,999, but he wanted 3x that amount. It wasn't about the nostalgia. IT WAS about THE MONEY.

See my other comments here for additional details.

1
CasuallyObservant 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just because something is old, doesn't mean we have to make a big deal over it. Interestingly, the owner hasn't lived there in a very long time. Reports confirm that the building has been rented out to a man named Schwartz for at least the last 8 years.

According to one article, Schwartz created a sort of museum inside the house, displaying photos and other archival material of historical Phoenix. He even built a coffee bar in the house that he opened to the public during recent 'First Fridays'.

He called it 'The Emerson Espresso Preservation Lounge'. But the business is now listed as 'temporarily closed'. The owner of the property would have had to be on board with the use of his home as a commercial business or coffee shop. There would have been health code compliance and variances obtained and zoning changes petitioned and approved. Maybe the Schwartz fellow is a relative of the owner. Who knows.

And, according to the news article, Mr. Young (the owner) lived there in the 1970s - 1990s. Nowhere does it say he lived there after that! Perhaps this whole cry of 'they are taking my home!' is a ruse to get more $$$ out of ASU.

Mr. Young can't claim victimhood over his primary residence being condemned, when it is not where he lives and is actually a rental property that has a tenant in it.

And there's this: Young said ASU bumped its offer to $999,000, but Young refused because ASU wouldn’t pay for relocating the house, which Young said would cost between $2 million and $3 million. [Now that's just ridiculous!]

See this:

1
CasuallyObservant 1 point ago +1 / -0

HERE ARE THE TRUE DETAILS:

The house is small on a very tiny lot that is no longer a residential area. All has been converted to commercial except his little spot. 100 years ago, his brick home was in the middle of farmland and fields. No longer. His home fronts and sides to busy rush hour traffic and highrise commercial buildings. Whatever it was 50 years ago when he bought it is gone. Most people would have sold and gotten out long ago.

The whole piece of ground (the lot) is only 4,067 Square Feet total. The old house and decrepit outbuildings is just 1,277 sq. ft.

A couple of rundown places adjacent to him that were sold and are in the process of being torn down, with the lots cleared and turned into parking lot. He doesn't even have a paved driveway. The Zillow estimate for the house and tiny lot in its condition is $140,000, which is very low for Phoenix.

The offer of $850,000 for this tiny spot is EXTREMELY GENEROUS. The old man should be thanking his lucky stars they are willing to give him that amount. He could buy a much nicer and larger place with his profits. Sheesh. Take a look:

https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/623-N-4th-St-Phoenix-AZ-85004/7522336_zpid/

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›