The procedure itself has in recent times yielded looser and preciser results but even so there is a minute mortality rate, as well as a rate of highly undesirable results like skin bridges uneven scarring, and painful erections. In my heart, any mortality rate is unacceptable for a procedure that is ultimately unnecessary and influenced by opinion and preferences. In classical fashion the worst of these is buried by yours truly the orchestrators of every insipid Covid protocol that has killed who knows how many.
The true “horror” sets in when I see the men this has hurt, how they are ignored, and how they have had to watch this become commodified and their pain minimized. It feels like a glimpse of things to come from these medical tyrants who want chips, dots, bots and who knows what else in our bodies. The fact that a largely cosmetic procedure is routinely performed on human being’s most personal anatomy despite its risks is to me a threshold crossed for things that are not as readily visible, felt, reversible, and personal to be introduced into the population with little resistance. Particularly because so many see no problem with something this much more obviously invasive on an infant.
Odious fears. I have no doubt in a highly technological future for our species but in our current state I don’t trust the hands that technology is in.
Thanks for being open to conversation with someone as adamant as me, and giving me space to vent. Odd place for it, but the idea of our infernal entertainment industry rejuvenating their faces with the bodies of infants needs to go with the rest of this old system while the bigger fish are being fried. That is my prayer anyways. Thank you.
You’ve been a lot more patient with me than I you. Thank you for setting this example.
The inner skin of the prepuce and the surface of the glans is of a similar type of tissue as vaginal walls. They keep lubricated to facilitate a man’s bond with his wife. The fold of skin prevents a calloused glans from “shoveling” out lubricative fluids produced during sex. The texture of the inner foreskin interfaces with the texture of vaginal walls. The hood protects the glans from overstimulation and becoming calloused. It protects the urethral opening from dirt and other infectants as well as stops your coronal ridge from constantly rubbing against your clothing. “Ribbed for her pleasure” condoms attempt to recreate a facsimile of what an intact penis should feel like to a woman. The fine sensory nature of these nerves can communicate the same amount of information as your fingertips.
Smegma is a naturally occurring thing, even women accumulate skin cells around their genitals. This is not a need to amputate humans. The proposed health benefits of circumcision have ranged from preventing prostate cancer, stopping bed wetting, stopping masturbation, and more ridiculous to things you can tell have clearly never been prevented by this. The study showing a reduction in STDs was conducted in Africa but never had its findings reproduced in a country that had adequate sexual health education and large enough test groups of both populations to peer review this.
At birth the glans penis is strictly an internal organ as the inner foreskin is fused to it, as firmly as a fingernail . Attempting to uncover a glans in this state is violent. It requires a metal probing rod to detach the prepuce from the glans before it can be removed. The glans naturally remains covered until a child reaches puberty. Without consent this is considered sexual violence with a foreign object.
The risk of an infected circumcision wound in a feces and urine soaked diaper is higher than the risk of a UTI in an intact infant with caring parents who know hygiene.
The risk of penile cancer is so small you would have to deny 300,000 men the full spectrum of their sexual functions that God gave them from birth to prevent one case. Even then humans get testicular cancer, prostate cancer, and all manner of other things at an alarming rate our due to things CDC is not concerned about.
There are many men who are upset with what has happened to them and they are not taken seriously all. Their sexual trauma of the realization that an absolute stranger both invaded their bodies by force with a foreign object and then removed it is real.
It’s part of you for only you and your wife and a complete stranger clipped one of the best parts of it off to meet an outdated hygiene and aesthetic standard instead of trusting you’d be able to wash your wiener when you shower. Like you’re some kind of farm creature or livestock that can’t be trusted to take care of itself.
I just think it should be on the radar too is all. Because this country does more to defend these things than protect men against them and men who have had very unsatisfactory results due to this unnecessary procedure are not taken seriously, and even ridiculed for being unhappy with what was forced on them.
And listen to the screams before anesthesia was a thing… they’ve been happening for thousands of years. Anyone making a scream like that is being tortured - even if they don’t remember. And we live in a world where mothers giggle at how exhausted their newborns are after screaming themselves unconscious.
Nobody has an umbilical cord growing up. All men have a foreskin growing up unless you forcibly amputate it without their consent. You defend the supply chain for things like operas foreskin lotion because you can’t bathe and compare the intricate sensory functions of an intact penis to an umbilical cord.
So many circumcisions are performed without anesthesia and have been through history, you should hear the noise the infant makes and tell me it doesn’t sound like someone is being tortured.
Oh wait you justify inflicting that kind of pain on an infant because “they won’t remember”
I’m sorry you live in some backwoods hillbilly hellhole with no access to showers. I’ll teach my kids hygiene and you keep advocating to keep the supply chain for Oprah’s adrenochrome lotion operational.
Imposing your personal taste in aesthetics on somebody else’s genitals by force.
All this Covid stuff and you still support their wives tales about hygiene. And not only that you defend your right to impose your own adult sexual beauty standards on the genitals of an infant.
I would hope to never have to defend a decision like requesting cosmetic surgery on an infants penis for my own sexual preferences. It’s sick.
Sadly yes. I wouldn’t mind the cult being cut off from whatever they are getting out of keeping this barbaric ritual alive.
You’re not wrong to feel that way about yourself and you’re right I’m not trying to make a direct point by point comparison between the two but if you want to uproot an adrenochrome addicted cult that rules the world it’s worth considering that this country was tricked into unnecessarily performing surgery without anesthesia on infants for decades now and why even you’re defending it.
The truth is the “aesthetics” and “convenience” so rarely outweigh what they know they have that they virtually never seek out the procedure. It can only propagate itself by being forced on the helpless.
People would allow a stranger to perform surgery on a baby for their own personal ideals of AESTHETICS - not only that they’re imposing their personal beauty standards on an infant’s genitals by force. Not only that, the right to do so is defended by saying the baby won’t remember the procedure.
The hair on the back of my neck stands up when I think of somebody justifying what they did to a child to fulfill their own selves by saying “they won’t remember”.
Why don’t adult people line up for it if it’s so great. Your ideals of cleanliness and aesthetics can only be forced on the unconsenting for it to be this prevalent. I prefer ideals that attract people of their own merit, not because generations were strapped down and had it forced upon them.
I know, there is actual pushback to child mutilating propaganda this time.
Yes my heart goes out to everyone in the world who experiences this travesty. I advise anyone who tries to defend this grotesque practice by saying “it’s just our culture” to try to defend the actions of Muslims to their daughters in Somalia because “it’s just their culture”
The “practicality” of this procedure has ranged in claims of preventing bed wetting, helping prostate cancer, and more ridiculous things. None of which are true. We live in a country where we can shower every day you do not need to force the “practicality” of ablating swaths of genital tissue onto people without their consent. We don’t live in a desert hellhole in the year 4000BC we have access to plenty of clean water to keep our bodies healthy.
A procedure started by a puritan who advised it as a way to prevent masturbation. You are operating on outdated and debunked propaganda of people who are adamant about wanting to cut pieces of infant penis off.
Look up Essiac on Amazon and read the reviews. Also you can’t be a catalyst for the light of God and his healing if you eat babies - the baby eaters rely on false miracles and their ladder over the fence, their tower into heaven. You who know the gate can usher others towards it like a welcome guest not as a thief with a ladder.
Modern Christian soteriology and other apologetics/theology has many elements in it that are abominations to the Lord. I believe the modern church tells just enough truth and poisons the well to prepare people for a false Christ. Jesus says to repent to he saved and the church says to believe in sacrifice to be saved. One of those two ideas are one God said numerous times in scripture the other is treated as worthless and insulting to the lord. Study this for yourself. But if there is enough interest I could go into detail. But such chapters as Ezekiel 18 make clear Gods ideas of forgiveness and the ideas he makes known about his forgiveness over and over again are not compatible with what most churches teach. It has gotten to the point where I believe the blind are leading the blind they are so entrenched in layers of poor doctrine.
Put it in your bio next to your pronouns if it matters that much.
Yeah bro not mock it or make light of it you need to be a light on the hill people are drawn to not a jerk who calls people names. Jesus didn’t insult people for being corrupted by an evil world he exposed the seats or evil itself. His scorn was always directed to the real perpetrators of evil not the lost being lead by the blind. This man is a victim of transgenderism and that is the truth. Should he repent his healing will be a valuable asset. For now he is spiritually naked, he is starved of truth, and he is sheltered by demons. Cruel words will not clothe or nourish him, they are just sharp stones we throw as if we’ve never done anything wrong.
He is a victim of brainwashing dude. Jesus didn’t go around calling the victims of evil stuff like “freaks” he attacked the seats of corruption themselves.
You can search all you want for a post but you won’t find anything with some of the dumbass titles people use. “Pedes this anon boom wow durr durr” instead of just saying keywords so it’s easier to find. I’ve tried to find things I know exist on the dot wins and it turns out the title was usually some nonsense.
The guy is literally just a state trooper (Kantonspolizei). Graubünden flag has that ram on it and he just has a tourist attraction badge on his arm that even the stupidest tourists can understand.
I hope more people read this lol.
Sigil of Lucifer
Look very closely at the eye cover.
You vill steal ze memes and you vill be happy. https://files.catbox.moe/bu5dyq.png
Circumcision is unnecessary and they commodify your infant genital tissue for cosmetics like Oprah’s anti aging cream.