Here's the full article.
Did he give support?
Princess Diana was not close to Trump.
Perhaps it because I'm older, but I hear so many myths about times I lived through
Trump said he met her one time.
This guy is screwed.
The problem is you cannot count sealed Indictments that way.
Unless you have insider access to that specific district court, you CANNOT distinguish one sealed proceeding from another.
This is why www.bad-boys.us stopped using "sealed Indictments" and now talks about sealed cases. They changed the language a few years ago, but they didn't go on to educate people on the difference.
The difference means they have no way of knowing how many of those 500,000 sealed cases are Indictments. NONE.
Where's the evidence his Dad was a leftist?
There seems to be some facts wrong in that screenshot. The family did talk to the police for like a month before they hired a lawyer.
Where's the silverware thing come from. I never saw real evidence for that claim.
Why?
The GA kid already has visits from the local sheriff and was not old enough to own a gun.
Both of those things don't apply to crooks.
Probably not. Indictments only come from grand juries. A judge can just move to deport you.
However, if you miss an immigration court hearing, you will most likely receive a deportation order.
It's an ABC article and it's definitely only DC. But still, if we applied that to all 93 judicial districts. It doesn't come anywhere close to 61,000.
And you would think the DC district court would have more than say, North and South Dakota.
So, it is a wrong comparison I think.
This is basically a giant clue that the theory there 10,000's of sealed Indictments and now half a million sealed Indictments waiting to be acted on is not supported by facts.
Because another fact is. Outsiders cannot count sealed indictments using PACER. There's just no way to tell one sealed court filing from another. Lots of things are sealed and many of them stay sealed.
So this article argues against the high number of sealed Indictments.
This article said 36 sealed Indictments are unusual.
But this came out several months AFTER people were claiming there were already 25,000 sealed Indictments, a claim going around in early 2018
https://x.com/ItsAngryBob/status/984108499742404608?s=19
By August they were claiming 45,000.
https://imgur.com/a/sealed-indictments-10-30-17-through-7-31-18-U0tRx8w
In November when that article came someone replied to it saying there were 61,000 sealed Indictments
https://x.com/davidurbano/status/1063627150656458753?s=19
So there's a giant disconnect there
I'm sorry but what are you talking about here?
Deferred prosecution agreements were the staple of the Guliani RICO playbook in taking down the NYC crime families.
I don't think deferred prosecutions were ever used against the mob in NYC or elsewhere.
They are used against corporations https://www.mololamken.com/knowledge-Whats-a-Deferred-Prosecution-Agreement#:~:text=Under%20a%20DPA%2C%20the%20government,agrees%20to%20drop%20the%20charges.
Indicting low level members to flip them is not an example of a deferred prosecution agreement which is a different thing altogether. Plea bargains for cooperation are a different type of agreement
Here's a deferred prosecution agreement for Boeing
That's one of the comments in that Twitter thread.
Let me guess, you think Seal Team Six is half a dozen guys
Either they are real indictments or they are not. If they are real Indictments, folks with inside access to court system could read them and see who is involved.
The US military does not work on Indictments.
John Huber is not working on this.
He left government a long time ago.
This is what Trump said about Huber.
https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1268132011203575811?s=19
The 470 does not refer to anything in the military. There's a Q post where it clearly refers to the number of folks in the DOJ 's IG office
That was like 8 years ago wasn't it?
There's a military base in New York City.
I think you're missing the point.
Arizona driver's license indicates whether or not you were a citizen.
Perfectly legal to use an Arizona driver's license to register to vote.
Because it shows if you are a citizen or not. Non-Citizens do not vote in Arizona. It's a myth.
The sentencing was never scheduled for today.
A ruling on the date of sentencing was.
Judge moved it to November after the election
I can't believe enough people pay attention to Bill de Blasio for there to be comms.
That probably just means boomers retired.
Yes, but again, Indictments are unsealed all the time. There's no 18-month in the United States where indictments haven't been unsealed.
So I'm not sure what's even being talked about there.
What do you mean we haven't had on any indictments unsealed in 18 months? Indictments are unsealed all the time
Here's one of the big indictment they just dropped. It was filed under seal in early August. https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1366441/dl
Is this something about a long-term sealed indictment?
Influencers desperate for content are recycling things.
It's not a crime.
Arizona indicates your citizenship on your driver's license.
So a license is proof of eligibility to vote https://www.yavapaivotes.gov/Voter-Registration/Proof-of-Citizenship
His Dad is a registered Libertarian, gun owner and Hunter.