This is routine in indictments.
The rule is not that you can't give any identifying information. It's that you can only name people charged in the indictment, so there's no ambiguity if someone's being charged with a crime or not.
When someone is named in an indictment, it means that a grand jury has formally charged them with a crime:
Another roll of an indictment is the accuse needs to have enough information to know the charges against them and some of the evidence to be able to prepare a defense.
This is what they are being charged with.
COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Violate the Foreign Agents Registration Act)
COUNT TWO (Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering)
I do think it's a strong possibility the Founders cooperated against the two Russians.
The indictment says the founders knew the investor were Russians even though they were telling Tim Pool and Benny Johnson that it was a french guy. There was absolutely no internet presence for this guy Even though he was supposed to be a high executive and a French bank.
When they got paid none of the money came from this supposedly French guys company
U.S. Company-I received its 30 inbound wire transfers from seven foreign entities - none of which were U. S. Company-l ' s contract counterpart.
And the two Russians who supposedly were just editing and production staff were dictating what content the company should put out.
So the two founders had to know what the deal was.
I see the two possibilities as the two founders were hit with a sealed indictment and then cooperated.
Or
The two founders were basically in on it but had enough plausible deniability that they might not get a conviction.
I hadn't thought about this
do you think there are other characters behind the scenes?
But looking up one of the founders she has a lot of other interesting connections.
There's an active military base in Brooklyn with 900 National Guard there
New York City has had National guard presence on and off since 9/11.
Yeah that guy's all walking red flag
The indictment has plenty of info on what company they're talking about
https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1366266/dl
......launching in or about November 2023, U.S. Company-I has posted nearly 2,000 videos that have garnered more than 16 million views on YouTube alone.........Founder-I , and Founder-2 also worked together to deceive two U.S. online commentators ("Commentator- I" and "Commentator-2" ), who respectively have over 2.4 million and 1.3 million YouTube subscribers. ...mmFounder-I and Founder-2 are foreign nationals who reside in .the United States......Founder-I and Founder-2 jointly control and operate U.S. Company-I,..... Before operating U.S. Company-I.......Founder-I and Founder-2 worked directly for RT and its affiliates......Company-I is a United States corporation established under the laws of Tennessee.
On its website, U.S. Company-I describes itself as a "network of heterodox commentators that focus on Western political and cultural issues" and identifies six commentators - including Commentator-I and Commentator-2 - as its "talent."
It was known a local cop who was on the ground took the ninth shot.
What was revealed recently? Was that shot actually hit crooks's gun. We now know that Crooks moved after that shot and did not shoot any further
We've known for weeks a local cop took the first shot.
BTW, the Willow Creek uranium mine that was owned by Uranium One has been owned by a Texas company since 2021.
The entire thing that this is about TENET / Rubin etc is speculation.
I don't think that's the case. There's enough identifying information in the indictment. They described TENET using the exact language TENET uses on their website And other details in the indictment line up. Tim Pool and Benny Johnson has issued statements that they basically are victims and were not aware of where the money was coming from. Pool, Johnson and Rubin are not implicated in crimes.
the cooperating part is not speculation but rather faulty logic.
Names in indictments are always omitted if they are not the person being charged with a crime.
The logic behind guessing they are cooperating is because there's a ton of information in the indictment about what they did and what they knew. They knew they were working with Russian money and hid that from the people they were hiring for TENET
So the question becomes why were they not indicted?
The government dropped 2 indictments and the sanctions today. It was a coordinated thing.
RT got sanctioned and two RT employees got indicted.
Which part sounds like speculation? The cooperating?
That's definitely a guess.
The founders of Tenet are not charged.
Cooperating?
The DOJ Indictment that involves TENET media thing is going to have a lot of people talking to their lawyers
Just saw this on Twitter The DOJ doesn't name tenet media and it's founders were not charged. Are they cooperating?
Harris 58% (+22) Trump 36%
This is underperforming Biden
So in reply to the other comment?
These are not the weapons Lavrov is talking about.
Also Lavrov has been talking about red lines since 2022.
What's this part have to do with the original post?
Trump held several events in this space. If you do a search for Trump South Court Auditorium
You'll find pictures
This is what the rest of the room looks like
Zidovudine is AZT.
AZT has been around for decades.
Even if you don't like the decor, why is that "a red flag."
a wall that doesn't even reach the ceiling
Um, So what? It's a temporary space they change all the time Here's how the event actually looked.
https://www.youtube.com/live/2-36_ojjWhk?si=jujHC6B8qa6nTWG1
And finally there is the comically small desk. Keep in mind that this is a type of event that President Trump would hold in the oval office.
Trump used this same space for several events some times with a small desk he tended towards just a blue curtain with flags
Or the name of the program he was promoting
Dow Jones is up 6% in the past month.
What's with the doom?
What's the red flag here?
17.45 just now.
Whoa. Back over 18.00
I bet every one of those people taking AZT died of AIDS
He should read the executive order
It builds up on a different executive order.
which depends on this law the Venezuela Defense of Human Rights and Civil Society Act of 2014
So you need to get Congress to pass a law first to get the authority in that EO.
I'm in no way qualified to give an investment advice on the internet. But if I was long-term holding I would do exactly what you're doing.
Cuz I think it's going to be a lot worse in the next month.
Trump's appeal for his NY fraud case is later this month. He's still on the hook for like $470 million.
Lets say he just wanted to cover it with Truth Social money. I think he would have to sell more than 470 million in stock. I think there's tax considerations if he wanted to clear 470 million, he might have to sell a lot more.
I'd be very surprised if he didn't sell something this month.
This did not happen.
Welcome to the new deepfake world.