3
huhWHAThuh 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you remember, about the same time that the fractional voting machines were put into use (early 2000s) the word "liberal" was associated with crazy, lunatic, anti American identity. It was avoided like the plague. Journalists (including leftists) would refer to it as, "the L word."

So what changed? Liberals started "winning," with the cheat machines.

The public didn't change. Voting "results," changed ON PAPER.

The VAST MAJORITY of the public still agrees, but the media and Govt. has convinced them they are minority. They are not. We are not. But they now steal elections at will. That's the only thing that changed. And I fear the upcoming election will be the same if the cheat machines are not removed. And so far I see no evidence that any have been or will be removed.

2
huhWHAThuh 2 points ago +2 / -0

I get good results on web crawler.

4
huhWHAThuh 4 points ago +4 / -0

And dispense with the opening and closing ceremonies. That used to mean the proud athletes marching into the stadium with their country's flag.

Around 1980 they started the pagan symbolism with satanic themes.

Yes, I noticed the change that far back, and talked about it with a friend who was also awake at that time.

I have ignored the Olympics faithfully since then.

2
huhWHAThuh 2 points ago +2 / -0

Reassign the 78,000 new IRS agents to the border. They could actually make a contribution to Government fiscal responsibility there.

2
huhWHAThuh 2 points ago +2 / -0

Look into everything. Scripture explains and verifies Scripture. I study every night, and have for many years. That's the only way you can avoid and overcome the "ravening wolves,"

What I would caution you about is judging an Apostle who sacrificed his life spreading the Gospel to be, "Antichrist:"

Matt.7 [2] For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.

I have seen no reason to assume Millennial Kingdom is anything other than literal, and established by Christ at his return on the last day at the last trump. I have listened to arguments that it is otherwise, but they haven't shown me anything convincing. But I am open to sound scriptural based arguments.

Now?

I don't see any wolves dwelling with lambs. Isa.11 [6]

2
huhWHAThuh 2 points ago +2 / -0

What changed from the old covenant to the new?

You have the nerve to call the Apostle Paul, Antichrist without knowing even the fundamentals of Christianity?

Jer.3131] Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: [32] Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD: [33] But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.

You didn't note what Scripture you were citing, but I assume you are referring to Matt 5: 17-18. Try reading that IN FULL:

Matt.5 [17] Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. [18] For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

For emphasis in Caps: "TILL ALL BE FULFILLED."

What were the Lord's last words on the cross?

John.19 [30] When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost.

For emphasis in Caps: IT IS FINISHED.

Before you accuse the Apostle Paul of "Antichrist," I recommend you read Matt 12[36]

Matt.12 [36] But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.

1
huhWHAThuh 1 point ago +1 / -0

If Paul did as you say, it was with the full approval of the Apostles at Jerusalem. See Acts 15 and Acts 21.

And the Apostle John states clearly who are antichrists and who are not:

1John.2[19] They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.

3
huhWHAThuh 3 points ago +3 / -0

Rom.12 [19] Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.

He's better at it than you or I could ever dream of.

3
huhWHAThuh 3 points ago +3 / -0

How or why would ANYBODY construct a building of any sort with a roof that was unsafe to walk on because of the "pitch," or for ANY other reason?

With that condition, how could they fix or repair a leak or any other problem that eventually presents itself in the life of every structure?

Total nonsense on the face of it.

Edit: The pitch is not severe, so I assume they are talking about its ability to support the weight of a man. Pennsylvania gets lots of snow. A foot of show on that much square footage would weigh tons. And a man could easily walk on a roof with that low pitch. Either way, that excuse falls flat. But the roof certainly wouldn't be engineered to fall flat in normal conditions.

4
huhWHAThuh 4 points ago +4 / -0

He probably would've tried to order a pizza if they handed the phone to him.

1
huhWHAThuh 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's why they have radio contact. 2 minutes to clear it up is about 1:55 more than it would take to verify.

1
huhWHAThuh 1 point ago +1 / -0

Amateurs wouldn't allow that obviously. People in the crowd could have and would have stopped it if not for knowing that they would likely be shot for climbing onto that roof. SS with a radio or uniformed police could have easily ended the threat.

5
huhWHAThuh 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's raci....uhh....homop.....uhh....mysogi....uhh....well it's goofy or something bad!

2
huhWHAThuh 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for the info. I'll have to dive deeper.

1
huhWHAThuh 1 point ago +1 / -0

A man named Crooks attempted to assassinate Trump for wanting to take "Crooked" Joe Biden's job?

1
huhWHAThuh 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have told people from the start that this was on the way.

Now the next step is to criminalize parents who violate their baby's, "right to choose."

Insane? Sick? Degenerate?

Of course. It was from the start.

2
huhWHAThuh 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can't expose Saudi involvement without co exposing American intelligence agencies involvement. Ain't gonna happen. Same with remaining JFK files. If they ever come out, they will be blank black sheets of paper.

6
huhWHAThuh 6 points ago +6 / -0

this one shows him smiling broadly, then the deep breaths to get into character, but there is at least one from another news outlet that catches several seconds before that where he is yuking it up with a couple of other crisis actors that is even more obvious. He looks surprised it's his turn so soon, and has to do a complete change of character to distraught father on the spot.

2
huhWHAThuh 2 points ago +2 / -0

The hoax is finally being revealed publicly. Dr. Jay at Pfander films on youtube is blowing the lid off all of the false claims in Islam. And he is showing the proof.

https://www.youtube.com/@pfanderfilms/videos

It is mind boggling how much of Islamic "history" is provable bunk.

Even the "prophet," himself.

2
huhWHAThuh 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, thanks, and I am well aware of that part of history. Volumes could be written about that segment of the story.

1
huhWHAThuh 1 point ago +1 / -0

However, I would say the Christian crusaders were probably guilty of similar.

Please note that the "Christian," crusaders first sacked and slaughtered Christian Constantinople before ever stepping foot inside the Holy Land, which set the stage for the Moslems to shortly conquer the citadel of Eastern Christianity.

But that's another story. It's a deep and tangled tale of political intrigue, and takes much effort to get to the crux of it all.

1
huhWHAThuh 1 point ago +2 / -1

Years ago i did research on the Armenian Genocide by the Turks. One man recounted his grandmother's experiences of it. She said when the Trumpets sounded at daybreak their communities were attacked by blood thirsty bands of Muslims with rape, plunder, pillage, and mass murder.

When the trumpets sounded again at sundown, the Muslims returned with bandages, food, and blankets to care for the injured which they had been slaughtering all that day.

The following morning was always a repeat performance of the previous day.

From that account i would suppose your experience was certainly half right.

Reportedly more than 2 million Armenian Christians lost their lives for their Christianity in the genocide.

5
huhWHAThuh 5 points ago +5 / -0

Nicotine renders a person 80% less likely to contract the Covid virus.

Is it coincidence that the massive worldwide campaign against tobacco follows essentially the same timeline?

I don't recommend that anyone smoke. But I have been advising people to keep some Nikorette nicotine gum in their medicine cabinets for decades.

I didn't know exactly what was coming. But I knew that there was a reason for an orchestrated world wide campaign like the one i saw happening, and whatever was coming would not be good.

I have been awake and watching for a long time.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›