If it were genetic, it would extinguish itself almost immediately.
They don't produce offspring.
Hungary has many Centuries of throwing out the Ottoman Empire Muslim "migrants" who invaded or attempted to invade their country.
They know first hand what the "religion of peace" does when they invade.
Orban's mother didn't raise a fool.
It is a threat, as it is designed to be a threat to everyone in Washington DCCP.
If Trump had been President at the time, there probably would have been another impeachment for dereliction of duty resulting in mass deaths, and the media vultures would have been sweeping in 24/7.
Big Bird followers "could" engage in real world violence.
Yeah, the Moslems controlled Spain over 700 years until the Christians reconquered it.
You're on target. When any person or group is allowed to create money out of thin air, they have just been allowed to OWN everything and every person on Planet Earth.
Why?
Because everything and every person on Earth is bought with money. Your time is purchased by money, and if you don't have enough of it you will have nowhere to live and no food on the table for your family.
"100 years ago at Jeckyl Island," the Fed handed itself ownership of everything and every person on Earth. And nobody seemed to notice a thing.
But at least a few of us do now.
I took it as an allusion to the Moslem leader Ṭāriq ibn Ziyād. The story goes that when his troops landed in Spain, he had the boats they crossed in burned and told his troops that they win there or die there.
That's the only "burned his boats," legend that I know.
It's no longer a "Mystery." I actually saw this on the TV set at my Doctor's office a few years ago.
It was, of course, on the medical channel, pushing all sorts of big pharma and the like. And this actually came on several times during my hour or so wait.
The medical establishment has finally found the cause of SIDS. It is "third hand cigarette smoke." There was no citing of science backing this conclusion, just the revelation that the culprit had been found.
Third hand cigarette smoke is not the smoker. It is not someone in the same room as the smoker. Third hand cigarette smoke is to be around someone who has been around someone who smoked a cigarette.
There was no mention of the science, because obviously there is no way to collect data and determine if someone has been around someone who has been around someone who smoked. or how many times a baby had been around someone who had been around someone who smoked. But nonetheless it had at that time become scientific "fact" that third hand cigarette smoke was the sole cause of SIDS.
It played in a regular loop along with the other junk propaganda.
As a side note the incident was right before the unveiling of the Covid 19 pandemic in which a person who uses nicotine products REALLY IS scientifically proven to be 80% less likely to develop the disease. It is probably impossible to calculate how much being around the smoke would reduce the infection rate. But it would likely play a role.
Everybody's boats are already burning. If Marxism is allowed to take over it will be what it has shown itself to be historically, incalculable suffering by way of concentration death camps and millions dead by way of political executions.
That sounds laughable and impossible to the Western mind, which is accustomed to freedom and individual liberty. But it was allowed to swallow Russia and Eastern Europe for most of the 20th Century, and that was the result there. And it took generations for them to break free. And countless millions of their friends, neighbors, and relatives murdered by the bloodiest political ideology in the history of Planet Earth.
And it is here and it owns our Politicians and our Mainstream media. And it is, inch by inch implementing itself now. And it is doing so against the will of the vast majority of citizens around the Globe.
They must've thought they landed in the UK.
Next time turn left at Moldova.
If you remember, about the same time that the fractional voting machines were put into use (early 2000s) the word "liberal" was associated with crazy, lunatic, anti American identity. It was avoided like the plague. Journalists (including leftists) would refer to it as, "the L word."
So what changed? Liberals started "winning," with the cheat machines.
The public didn't change. Voting "results," changed ON PAPER.
The VAST MAJORITY of the public still agrees, but the media and Govt. has convinced them they are minority. They are not. We are not. But they now steal elections at will. That's the only thing that changed. And I fear the upcoming election will be the same if the cheat machines are not removed. And so far I see no evidence that any have been or will be removed.
Do the State Armies have requirements that soldiers have men commanding them that wear skirts and lipstick too?
I get good results on web crawler.
And dispense with the opening and closing ceremonies. That used to mean the proud athletes marching into the stadium with their country's flag.
Around 1980 they started the pagan symbolism with satanic themes.
Yes, I noticed the change that far back, and talked about it with a friend who was also awake at that time.
I have ignored the Olympics faithfully since then.
Reassign the 78,000 new IRS agents to the border. They could actually make a contribution to Government fiscal responsibility there.
Look into everything. Scripture explains and verifies Scripture. I study every night, and have for many years. That's the only way you can avoid and overcome the "ravening wolves,"
What I would caution you about is judging an Apostle who sacrificed his life spreading the Gospel to be, "Antichrist:"
Matt.7 [2] For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
I have seen no reason to assume Millennial Kingdom is anything other than literal, and established by Christ at his return on the last day at the last trump. I have listened to arguments that it is otherwise, but they haven't shown me anything convincing. But I am open to sound scriptural based arguments.
Now?
I don't see any wolves dwelling with lambs. Isa.11 [6]
What changed from the old covenant to the new?
You have the nerve to call the Apostle Paul, Antichrist without knowing even the fundamentals of Christianity?
Jer.3131] Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: [32] Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD: [33] But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
You didn't note what Scripture you were citing, but I assume you are referring to Matt 5: 17-18. Try reading that IN FULL:
Matt.5 [17] Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. [18] For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
For emphasis in Caps: "TILL ALL BE FULFILLED."
What were the Lord's last words on the cross?
John.19 [30] When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost.
For emphasis in Caps: IT IS FINISHED.
Before you accuse the Apostle Paul of "Antichrist," I recommend you read Matt 12[36]
Matt.12 [36] But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
If Paul did as you say, it was with the full approval of the Apostles at Jerusalem. See Acts 15 and Acts 21.
And the Apostle John states clearly who are antichrists and who are not:
1John.2[19] They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.
Rom.12 [19] Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
He's better at it than you or I could ever dream of.
Tolerance is good or evil in direct proportion to the goodness or evil of that being tolerated.
But, yes, their childish word games normally fool the public.
How or why would ANYBODY construct a building of any sort with a roof that was unsafe to walk on because of the "pitch," or for ANY other reason?
With that condition, how could they fix or repair a leak or any other problem that eventually presents itself in the life of every structure?
Total nonsense on the face of it.
Edit: The pitch is not severe, so I assume they are talking about its ability to support the weight of a man. Pennsylvania gets lots of snow. A foot of show on that much square footage would weigh tons. And a man could easily walk on a roof with that low pitch. Either way, that excuse falls flat. But the roof certainly wouldn't be engineered to fall flat in normal conditions.
He probably would've tried to order a pizza if they handed the phone to him.
That's why they have radio contact. 2 minutes to clear it up is about 1:55 more than it would take to verify.
Cloning or surrogate pregnancies could have never allowed it to survive the millennia. It didn't exist.
People don't like plain facts. But that doesn't change them.