Implicit trust can only be given to our ideals - which are generally and eloquently expressed in the Declaration (We hold these truths to be self-evident . . .) and further elaborated in more specific, and therefore lesser, form in the Constitution.
A slow acting bioweapon.
But over five billion have now been vaxed so it's more than half the world's people.
It's apocalypse now.
b. A great catastrophe that results in widespread destruction or the collapse of civilization
Posted almost exactly this same thing about two weeks ago:
"Trustworthy elections are required to maintain the Republic. Without them the Republic ceases to exist - almost immediately."
And:
"Elections are more important than borders and abortion combined. (. . . )
What determines borders and abortion? What is the proximal predicate of our present state of affairs?
What is it NECESSARY to change before anything else can change?
It is the absolute integrity of our electoral process."
The SCOTUS interpretation of allowable speech would be a pretty good guide on this as they stick pretty close to the 1A.
If Elon is as good as his word about wanting Twit to be a free speech forum then he must eliminate censoring of opinions he doesn't agree with or doesn't want on his site.
Still some speech can't be construed as legal under the 1A. This line will always be challenged.
There was Abraham Lincoln and the Civil War, there was John Kennedy versus Nikita Krushchev.
There were the dough boys in the trenches . . .
Etc.
War is tiring on many men and women. Let's find a bigger reason than hard work and exhaustion to honor President Trump. Shouldn't be difficult.
Greatness is the calling for a very few to grow into through their extraordinary deeds.
The deeds are required.
Go into an intensive care ward or an ER and tell a code blue to chill and wait out the long game.
Likely he or she will take your advice.
And there are lots of people who are taking your advice to chill - just out on the street who will never make it to the ER. Millions.
So you won't have to spend a lot of precious time looking for people to advise. They're all over the place. They're all over the world.
This vaccine thing is just getting going. It's in its early phase when people all over the world are just beginning to sense what is happening.
In 1666, bubonic plague was bad. Mao's long march was bad. Stalin was a mass murderer. The world wars were bad. But we haven't seen the likes of the effect of a bioweapon on the five billion humans who have been injected.
To get 'biden' out of there (by ordinary means) the House has to impeach and the Senate has to convict. Conviction in the Senate takes 2/3.
That means about 16 democrat senators (+/-) would have to honor truth and rationality and find their own consciences in order to convict.
Sounds iffy to me.
So I'll recite my refrain one more time - Military is the only way . . .
And JW may be correct but I doubt "this administration" will end with impeachment and conviction.
I think "biden" was right when he made his remark about how we are going to have a cold, hard, dark winter. I think it's likely the cabal is planning to cut off diesel and idle the trucks and the trains. They'll take natural gas way down too. That's what I'd do in their position. The white hats will allow it all to happen in order to "wake the normies".
The national suffering will be used to drown out the laptop story. SADs will be attributed to "conditions" - to cold and hunger.
At some point something will happen and some people will do something. I don't know what it will be but I kind of think this is the plan. A trigger-crisis is required to initiate a period of martial law and bring in the Marines and the NG.
We then get martial law for about a year followed by the return of the Boss and MAGA.
For those who make it through, an age of enlightenment is waiting in the future.
And this is exactly why people across the country, like me, have lost confidence in The Wall Street Journal.
I should gather financial information from a source that prints an article like this one?
Where is their editorial judgement?
This is how even once-great news organizations fail.
Wonder if she got a booster from Prof. Affirmative Action.