James Woods with another Truth Bomb
(media.gab.com)
Comments (15)
sorted by:
…and when you don’t have a Constitution with a Bill of Rights you don’t have free will and determination.
Any Constitution AKA the formal statement of the powers of the government, if done without fraud, doesn't need a Bill of Rights.
Bill of rights is there to delineate rights we reserve to the people or the states. Limitations On government is what they are. Our rights come from God not that document.
Watch this:
Where by Signatories I mean We The People, and by Treaty I mean Constitution (because that is what both were purported to be).
Any treaty you are forced to sign (ours) is fraudulent. Any treaty you can't reasonably exit (ours) is fraudulent.
Regardless, the DoI made implicit statements of individual sovereignty. The Constitution did not. The Bill of Rights made explicit statements of not sovereign (5th amendment's eminent domain e.g.).
With the one sentence I added above, the Bill of Rights becomes redundant. In fact the Bill of Rights becomes fraudulent.
I know perfectly well the propaganda of what the Bill of Rights pretends to be. It was not that. In actuality (i.e. what actually happened) was that it was a fraudulent document that took away Sovereign Rights from We The People and gave back those which the PTB allowed. It created the illusion of respect for and acknowledgement of Rights, but really allowed for future fuckery.
As for the origin of our Rights, yes, they are dictated to us by That Which Is. It is That Which Is that bounds us, society can't except through fraud.
Thus, any formal declaration of governance that does not contain fraud would by necessity contain explicit and unequivocal statements of our intrinsic and inalienable Rights, not by listing them out, but by stating the obvious Truth; We The People are all individually Sovereign.
When you don't have a right to bear arms, you live at the mercy of those who do bear arms.
Night Vision 👉 Don't Cross Boarder 👉 News Travels Fast 👉 Get My Drift
eeeerrrrrr....dats 2 thangs james...
Posted almost exactly this same thing about two weeks ago:
"Trustworthy elections are required to maintain the Republic. Without them the Republic ceases to exist - almost immediately."
And:
"Elections are more important than borders and abortion combined. (. . . )
What determines borders and abortion? What is the proximal predicate of our present state of affairs?
What is it NECESSARY to change before anything else can change?
It is the absolute integrity of our electoral process."
What about when people don't care enough to even stage a protest about it ?
My question re: James Woods, Kevin Sarbo and others is...
How did they work in the Hollyweird and keep their souls in tact?
They must be incredibly strong individuals.
I thought nation and country were the same thing.
We are here
Agree with the country bit.
Election and nation are not related. Nation is based on to whom you are born. Elections have to do with a republican form of Government based on protection of human rights: see D.o.I, B.o.R, Constitution.
Well the DS does want to run all countries, so maybe that's why they are opening up all the borders, so the whole world would be controlled by a select few or maybe one King or President for the whole world.
An antichrist perchance?