You can't imprison people for possession of child porn since it's too easy to fake.
Instead, imprison people for molesting children, or making child porn, or soliciting kids for sex. Or even (maybe) for distributing child porn. But mere possession can't be a crime because it's too easy to abuse.
Stollen is misspelled because it includes an extra L.
Here's a Q post with a bracketed L:
Sure but who is he associated with? Who does he represent? Is he official in any capacity? What's this guy's story?
I don't know if removing the dual citizens from Congress is part of the plan.
If the plan anticipated Likud clearing out the Gaza strip, with the USA getting possibly dragged into WW3 as backup muscle to that operation, then likely the "plan" was Jewish in origin from the very beginning.
Why doesn't this post state WHO the person is speaking in the video?
It just says "message to" but doesn't say "message from".
I don't understand why this is Musk's problem in the first place.
Why doesn't the EU just block his site (as China would) if they don't want anyone in the EU looking at it?
Then the EU citizens can decide if they want to use a VPN, and if that's illegal, that's between them and their own government.
As if women were actually capable of contributing in any way to the national security.
Women as a group aren't even a net contributor to the tax base. As a group they pay no tax.
And they certainly aren't able to fight. Adding a woman to a combat unit triples the casualties.
Some advice on women in combat from a female veteran:
I'm a female veteran. I deployed to Anbar Province, Iraq. When I was active duty, I was 5'6, 130 pounds, and scored nearly perfect on my PFTs. I naturally have a lot more upper body strength than the average woman: not only can I do pull-ups, I can meet the male standard. I would love to have been in the infantry. And I STILL think it will be an unmitigated disaster to incorporate women into combat roles. I am not interested in risking men's lives so I can live my selfish dream.
We're not just talking about watering down the standards to include the politically correct number of women into the unit. This isn't an issue of "if a woman can meet the male standard, she should be able to go into combat." The number of women that can meet the male standard will be minuscule – I'd have a decent shot according to my PFTs, but dragging a 190-pound man in full gear for 100 yards would DESTROY me – and that minuscule number that can physically make the grade AND has the desire to go into combat will be facing an impossible situation that will ruin the combat effectiveness of the unit. First, the close quarters of combat units make for a complete lack of privacy and EVERYTHING is exposed, to include intimate details of bodily functions. Second, until we succeed in completely reprogramming every man in the military to treat women just like men, those men are going to protect a woman at the expense of the mission. Third, women have physical limitations that no amount of training or conditioning can overcome. Fourth, until the media in this country is ready to treat a captured / raped / tortured / mutilated female soldier just like a man, women will be targeted by the enemy without fail and without mercy.
I saw the male combat units when I was in Iraq. They go outside the wire for days at a time. They eat, sleep, urinate and defecate in front of each other and often while on the move. There's no potty break on the side of the road outside the wire. They urinate into bottles and defecate into MRE bags. I would like to hear a suggestion as to how a woman is going to urinate successfully into a bottle while cramped into a humvee wearing full body armor. And she gets to accomplish this feat with the male members of her combat unit twenty inches away. Volunteers to do that job? Do the men really want to see it? Should they be forced to?
Everyone wants to point to the IDF as a model for gender integration in the military. No, the IDF does not put women on the front lines. They ran into the same wall the US is about to smack into: very few women can meet the standards required to serve there. The few integrated units in the IDF suffered three times the casualties of the all-male units because the Israeli men, just like almost every other group of men on the planet, try to protect the women even at the expense of the mission. Political correctness doesn't trump thousands of years of evolution and societal norms. Do we really WANT to deprogram that instinct from men?
Regarding physical limitations, not only will a tiny fraction of women be able to meet the male standard, the simple fact is that women tend to be shorter than men. I ran into situations when I was deployed where I simply could not reach something. I wasn't tall enough. I had to ask a man to get it for me. I can't train myself to be taller.
Yes, there are small men. but not so nearly so many as small women. More, a military PFT doesn't measure the ability to jump. Men, with more muscular legs and bones that carry more muscle mass than any woman can condition herself to carry, can jump higher and farther than women. That's why we have a men's standing jump and long jump event in the Olympics separate from women. When you're going over a wall in Baghdad that's ten feet high, you have to be able to be able to reach the top of it in full gear and haul yourself over. That's not strength per se, that's just height and the muscular explosive power to jump and reach the top. Having to get a boost from one of the men so you can get up and over could get that man killed.
Without pharmaceutical help, women just do not carry the muscle mass men do. That muscle mass is also a shock absorber. Whether it's the concussion of a grenade going off, an IED, or just a punch in the face, a woman is more likely to go down because she can't absorb the concussion as well as a man can. And I don't care how the PC forces try to slice it, in hand-to-hand combat the average man is going to destroy the average woman because the average woman is smaller, period. Muscle equals force in any kind of strike you care to perform. That's why we don't let female boxers face male boxers.
Lastly, this country and our military are NOT prepared to see what the enemy will do to female POWs. The Taliban, AQ, insurgents, jihadis, whatever you want to call them, they don't abide by the Geneva Conventions and treat women worse than livestock. Google Thomas Tucker and Kristian Menchaca if you want to see what they do to our men (and don't google it unless you have a strong stomach) and then imagine a woman in their hands. How is our 24/7 news cycle going to cover a captured, raped, mutilated woman? After the first one, how are the men in the military going to treat their female comrades? ONE Thomasina Tucker is going to mean the men in the military will move heaven and earth to protect women, never mind what it does to the mission. I present you with Exhibit A: Jessica Lynch. Male lives will be lost trying to protect their female comrades. And the people of the US are NOT, based on the Jessica Lynch episode, prepared to treat a female POW the same way they do a man.
I say again, I would have loved to be in the infantry. I think I could have done it physically, I could've met almost all the male standards (jumping aside), and I think I'm mentally tough enough to handle whatever came. But I would never do that to the men. I would never sacrifice the mission for my own desires. And I wouldn't be able to live with myself if someone died because of me.
- Sentry
It's time to face the fact that feminism has failed. It has caused massive destruction in our country, politically, morally, and economically. It has devastated marriage, resulting in large numbers of divorced and unmarried women, single mothers and all the associated social/economic problems. It is a constant thorn in the side of business, resulting in endless lawsuits. It has resulted in women not having the option to work, but rather being forced to work outside the home in order to make ends meet.
Large numbers of children are aborted or raised without fathers, resulting in historic numbers of teen pregnancies, juvenile delinquency, gang activity, and all the associated social/economic problems. The black community, which used to have a growing middle class and higher rates of marriage than whites, has been debased and destroyed.
Women's liberation has made the electorate much more easily manipulated through fear (and sympathy), and it has shifted our entire political spectrum to the left, resulting in skyrocketing debt, taxes, and inflation, constant foreign wars, uncontrolled illegal immigration, BLM riots, rampant crime, and all other manner of ridiculous social problems. We now have trannies in the military and mentally ill men demanding to use women's restrooms. We are inundated with sexual harassment lawsuits and men being falsely accused, having their lives destroyed. We have female judges and crazy mothers forcing sex changes onto their sons against their father's permission. We have become the laughingstock of the whole world.
Birth control drugs are now known to cause brain damage, and to alter normal patterns of sexual selection and reproduction. Sperm counts are falling. Men are becoming feminized and weak. We have an entire generation of STD infected sluts, unable to find marriageable men, since the men are all smoking bong hits and playing video games. Everyone is fat and has pink hair, covered in tattoos and body piercings. A large percentage of young men are virgins, unable to find romantic partners. A small number of men are sleeping with most of the available women, resulting in modern-day harems. As a result, an unprecedented number of women are aging and alone, with historically high levels of childlessness, anxiety and mental illness, and many on anti-depressant drugs. Many young women are selling their bodies for the money they need for school so they can have a "career" they will eventually regret.
This will not end well; it's not sustainable. How will society pay for all of this in the future? It can't. We're already bankrupt. Many people are going to suffer in their old age. Happiness levels of both sexes are at an all-time low, and birthrates are below replacement levels -- our civilization is committing generational suicide.
If you could go back in time 100 years ago and show that patriarchal society what we would become as a result of women's liberation, what would they think? What would the women think, knowing the fate of their descendants? The warnings against women's liberation from that time have all come true, and even far beyond what they could have imagined back then.
We must repent of this evil.
Prion disease (e.g. mad cow disease) typically takes years to manifest after initial infection.
There have already been CJD (incurable brain wasting disease) deaths from the Covid mRNA shot, occurring within months of injection, which was unprecedented.
What if that's only the beginning? What if, over the next 10 years, we see a billion of those?
A recent study showed 17 million sudden deaths (e.g. not caused by prion disease) from the mRNA shots SO FAR.
And that's not counting the turbo cancers, which again, may be only at the very beginning of a standard deviation curve that extends over the next 10 or 20 years.
This event is already biblical in scope, but it may be we have seen nothing yet.
For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly, nor is circumcision that which is outward in the flesh; but he is a Jew who is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the Spirit, not in the letter; whose praise is not from men but from God.
Romans 2:28-29
For fenbendazole check out mycancerstory.rocks
Cancer is two-pronged:
-
Avoiding environmental causes (asbestos, smoke inhalation, radiation exposure, covid vaccines, etc).
-
Strengthen immune system. (D3, Turmeric, Zinc/Quercetin, C, E, plus healthy diet and exercise and all the other immune tricks we know about).
And there's also drugs like Ivermectin and Fenbendazole etc. And enzymes like Nattokinase and Serrapeptase (ON AN EMPTY STOMACH IN THE MORNING) for breaking down the spike proteins. And N Acetyl Cysteine.
I think all that stuff is still going to help alot more than not.
However, if the person has received a number of those evil shots, they're still probably not going to be in the best shape that they could have been. Especially if they got the bad batches. Their p53 is screwed, there's the igg4 thing, it's just worse and we all know it. Still, can't hurt to maximize the positives.
From Romans 4: "Abraham is the father of all who believe but have not been circumcised."
Frankly I don't get it. It looks dark red to me, not pink.
Let's assume that the Hamas attack was directed, or at least allowed, by the Israeli government, for the purpose of creating atrocity propaganda, in order to give them license to clear out the Gaza strip and crush Hamas and other terror activity there.
Given that, it still makes sense to me that Wictor's points are correct. (Regardless of any bias towards Israel he might have). Wictor is well-respected and does good work.
Consider that even if they are behind all this, Israel still has an incentive to use guided missiles, to target militants, and to minimize civilian casualties, which minimizes global political opposition to their operation. And even if Israel directed (or allowed) the Hamas attack, it doesn't change the facts that Islamists are barbaric, that they inculcate a culture of death from a young age, that they have likely destroyed some of their own buildings and killed a number of their own via mortars that fell short, that Hamas and Islamic Jihad have carried out a number of political murders, and other points that Wictor made.
His point was that it was a significantly lower percentage than the Gaza demographics, showing Israel had not indiscriminately targeted civilians. Furthermore, he also made the point that many of those under 18 were nevertheless combatants.
EDIT: This is to be expected if Israel wishes to minimize global political opposition to their operation. Such opposition is expected, and so they won't want it to be any greater than it already will be.
"...for your merchants were the world's great men, and by your pharmakeia were all the nations led astray."
The "Holocaust"
-
Autopsies of camp inmates by forensic expert Dr. Charles Larson showed that none of them were killed by poison gas.
-
No photographic evidence was taken by Allied aerial reconnaissance of the camps between 1942-1945 showing mass exterminations or removal of human remains even though such activity would had to have occurred round-the-clock.
-
No German communications, which were being monitored by the British government throughout the war due to the early cracking of German codes, alluded to any mass extermination in the camps.
-
No captured diaries or journals of high-ranking German officials alluded to any program of extermination, nor is there any documentation whatsoever alluding to a program of extermination.
-
Neither mass graves of eleven million bodies nor the remains of the equivalent number of bodies in lavers of ash and crushed bone have ever been located in or around the internment camps.
-
The human soap, skin lampshades, and shrunken heads were admitted as lies in mainstream American newspapers such as The New York Times in the 1980s.
-
The steam chambers and electrified floors, the first alleged methods of extermination. were quickly proven to be lies before the gas chamber story took hold. If the gas chambers had been real there would have been no need to lie about steam chambers and electrified floors first.
-
The Katyn Massacre, the shootings of over 20,000 Poles for which Germans were hanged, was admitted by the Russian government in 1990 to have been actually committed by the Bolshevik NKVD.
-
The Babi Yar massacre has been proven to be a lie conjured up by Bolshevik Jewish propaganda minister Ilya Ehrenburg. The story, which involved the Germans killing anywhere from 30,000-300,000 Jews outside of Kiev in 1941 (with no eyewitnesses) and then returning to the site three years later to dig up all the remains and destroy them using "bone crunching machines" (while being pursued by the Red Army, no less) was laughable to begin with. However, there is evidence which supports the executions of Ukrainians at the site in the early 1930s by the heavily-Jewish NKVD.
-
Official Soviet policy was to prioritize the evacuation of Jews via trains ahead of the German advance. Eastern Soviet territories such as Kazakhstan recorded huge numbers of Jews flooding into their lands during WWII.
-
All the "information" on gas chambers came from the Soviet Union, as the Western Allies did not capture any camps that are said to have had any. Nor is there film footage of any death camps, as the only camps which are claimed to be death camps today were captured by the Soviets, who didn't allow any film cameras into those sites.
-
All German camps had supplies of Zyklon B, not just the camps which were said to have had gas chambers. Large quantities of zyklon b are neither mysterious nor sinister, as it takes a relatively large amount of the spray to kill lice.
-
A ground-penetrating radar study conducted by an Australian research team in 1999 proved that the ground around Treblinka had been undisturbed down to 30 meters meaning that no human remains of one million people were deposited there. This supports official German documentation which shows Treblinka to be a transit camp.
-
Records show that German guards were severely reprimanded for so much as striking camp inmates, let alone killing them.
-
Germany has no history of genocidal behavior, not even at its most aggressive. Jews on the other hand do have a history of genocidal behavior, from Biblical times up to the Soviet Union and to modern-day Palestine. Jews are also notorious for projecting their own behavior onto their enemies.
-
German "admissions of guilt" were obtained through torture by Allied agents, which included genital mutilation, mock executions, beatings, and death threats directed at family members. Rudolph Hoess, commandant of Auschwitz, was injured so terribly he admitted to a crimes in a concentration camp that didn't even exist.
-
If the Germans had wanted to kill Jewish inmates all they would had to have done was simply not feed them: this is how Eisenhower exterminated 1.5 million German POWs in the Rhineland death camps after the war. There's no need for elaborate methods such as gas chambers.
-
Rudolph Vrba, the Slovak Jew who popularized the Gas chamber story, was forced to admit under oath during the Ernst Zundel trial in 1985 that he had never witnessed an actual gassing, and that his stories were "artistic representations" (lies).
-
Numerous Holocaust memoirs. such as Herman Rosenblat's 'Angel at the Fence' and Jerzy Kozinski's 'The Painted Bird' have been proven to be fiction.
-
If the Holocaust had actually happened it would not require Draconian laws drafted by powerful Jewish organizations to defend its veracity. No other historical narrative is protected by the threat of heavy tines and imprisonment.
-
All German documents and statements made by German officials show that the Final Solution meant the repatriation of Jews to their own territory in the East, not their extermination. There is no evidence to the contrary.
-
During World War One, the British government ran stories in the newspapers about Germans gassing people to death and bayonetting babies. After the war the British government issued an official apology for the lies. They didn't do the same after WW2.
-
Jews have a history of exaggerating their suffering, such as during the Khmelnytsky Uprising in Ukraine in the 17th Century. For centuries Jews claimed that half a million to a million of them died during the rebellion, when today it's accepted that actual Jewish casualties did not exceed ten thousand.
-
There is no reason to believe that the emaciated corses found in the camps by the Allied forces were anything other than victims or starvation and typhus, which afflicted all of Germany in the final weeks of the war due to Allied saturation bombing. Gassing people does not cause them to lose weight, and if Jews were being immediately gassed upon arrival at the camps, where are the otherwise healthy bodies that died from these gassings?
-
The mobile gas vans allegedly used to gas Jews were actually a Soviet invention by the Jew Isay Berg, a top-ranking NKVD official.
-
German commanders refused to follow Hitler's direct order to have murderous Bolshevik commissars executed, as the commanders considered cold-blooded killing dishonorable. Yet, people are told to believe that these same commanders were overseeing the widespread extermination of millions of civilians on the Eastern Front.
-
Allied propaganda states that the National Socialists had a policy of extermination towards Slavs in the Soviet Union, yet there is no proof of this, and throughout Eastern Europe, the Germans were welcome as liberators. Furthermore hundreds of thousands of Slavic Europeans volunteered for service in the Waffen-SS.
-
Sporadic killings of the few Jews that remained to be caught by the Germans in the Soviet Union were typically carried out by vengeful Slavs who had scores to settle after two decades of Jewish tyranny and violence directed at their countries and familles. It was German soldiers, in fact, who routinely tried to stop this violence.
-
The Einsatzgruppen, who lately have been the focus of Jewish TV shows, movies, and books on account of the death of the gas chamber lie, were German troops whose job it was to secure the rear lines, which were frequent targets of terrorist activity by Bolsheviks. There is no reason to believe they were shooting thousands or millions of people.
-
Going back to 1885 there are at least 200 mentions of six million Jews suffering terrible persecutions, many published in newspapers such as the New York Times. The number six has religious significance for Jews.
The Khazarian kingdom converted to Judaism a long time ago and many of them ended up in Europe as Ashkenazi Jews. People keep saying "Khazarian Mafia" as a way of saying "Jews" and also to imply that they "aren't real Jews."
Bottom line is it just means "Jews."
That island wasn't the only place.
Unless He's punishing you. Then he gives you what you want instead.
Oh you listened to the interview then?
Everyone needs to listen to RFK Jr's interview on Joe Rogan from June 15th of this year.
I was really blown away. Honestly the guy would make a great president.
Ding ding ding
Any AI trained on real-world data turns hardcore right wing. Without any liberal guardrails, it becomes conscious of "hate facts" including the JQ and other politically incorrect realities.
The case I use for flying is a hard metal case that comes with a metal cord that attaches it to the inside of my suitcase. Open the box with the key and inside is the firearm and magazines surrounded by soft foam.
Stollen is misspelled because it includes an extra L.
Here's a Q post with a bracketed L:
https://qposts.online/post/2478