1
magachudd 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's just blind vengeful feelings. She's done-zo and deep down inside they all know it.

2
magachudd 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow. The gall. So by "democrats working together when the opportunity arises" what he really means is attacking, stabbing, intimidating, blackmailing, conspiring, and cajoling anyone who doesn't jump in line for their initiatives.

Fuck. You. Scum.

Suck my MAGA.

2
magachudd 2 points ago +2 / -0

Damn. Well, I'm sure Trump has good reasons for this. Staying positive.

2
magachudd 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interesting. Guess we will find out soon...

2
magachudd 2 points ago +2 / -0

In any case you are right to call it out. We shouldn't have to whack a mole here is well.

2
magachudd 2 points ago +2 / -0

Edited the text of my post.

1
magachudd 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, I never said he did, but can see how the headline would convey that. I see it currently as only a rumor. Wanted to see yall's perspective on it including how or why the rumor would be circulating.

7
magachudd 7 points ago +7 / -0

Imagine that communication haha.

"To whom it may concern,

Please remove the national debt from your ongoing concerns. We understand that this may not be the news your organization would want to hear, but please understand that we do not care.

Signed, The American People

5
magachudd 5 points ago +5 / -0

Exactly. What debt? This would solve so many problems.

by raxlore
6
magachudd 6 points ago +6 / -0

I see what you did there 😉

8
magachudd 8 points ago +8 / -0

What is wrong with these people? Honest question.

1
magachudd 1 point ago +2 / -1

I don't think that's true necessarily. If CNN and those outlets want to crate those polls, then they can. WHs can just let them do so and drive it towards what they want. Similar to surfing, I guess. The wave generates its own and the surfer just uses it to perform tricks.

1
magachudd 1 point ago +1 / -0

Im hesitant of the whole Jordan Peterson, Pro-Israel crowd.

1
magachudd 1 point ago +1 / -0

Very succinct. Even worse and likely realistic, is that they start with the wrong decision that the public doesn't know about and then proceed to discuss endlessly to substantiate the wrong decision they made prior.

view more: Next ›